Documents

bbuget

Description
Budget 2011 is an item number. By Sheila, for Munni! B udget 2011 merely reflects the drift in the central government. Perhaps never in the history of independent India, with the sole exception of the period during Emergency, has the central government suffered from such a credibility crisis. Naturally, what matters is not the deficits -- fiscal, revenue, current account, and trade -- or for that matter power, infrastructure or even manpower deficits, but the trust deficit of India. When ques
Categories
Published
of 6
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  Budget 2011 is an item number. By Sheila, for Munni! B udget 2011 merely reflects the drift in the central government. Perhaps never in the history of independent India,with the sole exception of the period during Emergency, has the central government suffered from such a credibilitycrisis.Naturally, what matters is not the deficits -- fiscal, revenue, current account, and trade -- or for that matter power,infrastructure or even manpower deficits, but the trust deficit of India.When questioned on the state of drift by the electronic media a couple of weeks earlier, Prime Minister ManmohanSingh had blamed it on coalition compulsions.If it is corruption, it is the ally from South India. Blame the ally from the West for inflation. Blame it on the ally from theEast for Maoism, and the ally from Kashmir for the problems there.  Y et the prime minister asserts that this is not a 'lame duck' government and 'assures us' that he will complete theterm little realising some analysts in the interregnum have hyphenated India with Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.Given the state of affairs, Budget 2011 was indeed an opportunity for the central government to address this trustdeficit.Instead, the Budget turned out to be entirely vacuous, an accountant's delight interlaced with all the 'grand vision' of agram panchayat leader.On corruption, inflation and unemployment, the three major challenges facing the central government, the Budget hasremained inexplicably and eloquently silent. The disconnect between the central government and the mood of thenation seems to be complete. Short shrift to manufacturing   B udget 2011 seeks to enhance the share of the manufacturing sector in the national GDP from the present 16 per cent to about 25 per cent in the next 10 years.While the intention is indeed welcome, Budget 2011 has nothing specific to help fructify that. It may be noted thatseveral developing countries, particularly China, have realised that the road to economic nirvana is only bydeveloping their manufacturing sector.India, on the contrary, has attempted to adopt a unique grammar of development -- where services and notmanufacturing remains the engine of growth.While this is acceptable in the short run, the fact is that India's road to economic prosperity from now on shall impingeon our manufacturing sector. T his is simply because empirical evidence worldwide demonstrates that the growth of manufacturing sector ensuresbroad-based social development than the services sector.Successive central governments have realised that this is easier said than done as the manufacturing sector, incontrast to the services sector, shall be reforms sensitive.For manufacturing to contribute one-fourth to the national GDP, governments need to carry out intensive reforms.These include labour law reforms, tax reforms, administrative reforms, improvement in infrastructure, etc -- all of which combine to wreak havoc on India's manufacturing competitiveness.  T here is more to this. In March 2009, the rupee was traded approximately at Rs 52 to a US dollar. Since then it hasappreciated 15 per cent.It may be noted that this appreciation comes on top of the significant levels of inflation experienced by India in thesetwo years. That roughly translates into an implicit appreciation of the rupee by more than 35 per cent in the past twoyears.This explicit and implicit appreciation of the rupee is having a debilitating impact on the national manufacturing sector while simultaneously eroding our competitiveness.Some of India's peers have neither experienced such significant bouts of inflation in this period nor have they allowedtheir currency to appreciate T he net result is that we are running gargantuan trade deficits (caused to some extent by higher oil prices) -- closeto $10 billion per month.That in effect means that we are importing jobs into a country that is having huge unemployment in the first place!Naturally the obvious question follows: Why is that the government is preventing the depreciation of the rupee toreflect our economic fundamentals?The answer to that is not far to seek. Economic textbooks suggest that a stronger currency is an antidote to inflation. B y keeping the rupee stronger, economic managers are hoping to address the issue of inflation, little realising that itis hurting the manufacturing sector, which incidentally is barely on the radar of the national policy framers.It may also be noted that several Asian countries have modelled their growth pattern on the back of a weak currencywhile maintaining lower import tariffs.In short, given the extent of undervaluation of these currencies, import tariffs are irrelevant. But in our anxiety tomatch Asian rates, we seem to have forgotten the whole matrix. And that is the crux of the issue. India is caught in a Catch-22 situation -- if it allows the rupee to depreciate, therecould probably be higher inflation and should it not allow the rupee to depreciate, it could hurt Indian manufacturing,employment and our ability eradicate poverty. B ut do we realise this? Forget providing a course correction, Budget 2011 does not even seem to acknowledge thisdifficult situation. The net result: increasingly the government is seen as being irrelevant.  But who is the beneficiary of all this? With mounting trade deficits, India is compelled to look at capital flows to bridgethe current account deficits. Else we could have a repeat of 1991. That, in turn, compels the Reserve Bank of India tokeep the rupee stable and, if possible, strong. A stable rupee, it may be noted, virtually mitigates all currency risks as these are absorbed by the central bank.Naturally, a stronger and a stable rupee favours the financial sector, especially the FIIs, and positively discriminatesagainst our domestic manufacturing sector.In a country obsessed with Sensex and the stock markets, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) wield disproportionateinfluence on the national psyche and policy. T he reason for the same is not far to seek. It is generally believed that the FII route, thanks to the large regulatorygap in our capital markets that could allow a herd of elephants to walk through, allows enormous amounts of moneyto be first laundered away from India and then brought back through the FII route, more specifically through theMauritius route.The reason for using the Mauritius route is compelling -- according to the Indo-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement capital gains arising out of investment from Mauritius are not taxed in India and shall be taxed only inMauritius where the tax rate is zero.No wonder, in the past decade or so, 50 per cent of the foreign investments into India have srcinated from Mauritius.FII, in the Indian context, represents Foreign Indirect Investment!Naturally, vested interests in the establishment are rooting for this arrangement to continue. And successive budgetshave ensured that this arrangement not only continues but also is continuously 'liberalised'. B udget 2011 is no different. Accordingly, it states, 'to liberalise the portfolio investment route, it has been decided topermit the Securities and Exchange Board of India-registered mutual funds to accept subscriptions from foreigninvestors who meet the K Y C requirements for equity schemes. This would enable Indian mutual funds to have directaccess to foreign investors and widen the class of foreign investors in Indian equity market.'But there is a serious catch here -- Sebi has not prescribed the K Y C norms or the Know Y our Customer norms for FIIinvestment. And in case it inadvertently prescribes these norms, just route it through Participatory Notes (PNs). PNs, as readersmay know, are peculiar instruments in the Indian markets that allow multi-layering leading to anonymity for the'foreign' investors.
Search
Similar documents
Tags
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x