Leadership & Management

Bipartisanship and Idea Brokerage in Education Policy Networks

Description
We show how Democrats and Republicans converged to support similar policies on a major educational issue: teacher effectiveness. Our study demonstrates the importance of idea brokers —actors that bridge structural gaps between members of different
Published
of 30
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  Bipartisanship and Idea Brokerage in Education Policy Networks 1 Sarah Reckhow, Sarah Galey, and Joseph J. FerrarePaper prepared for the 9 th  Annual Political Networks Conference ashin!ton "ni#ersity St. $ouis, %&June '(, )*'+ Abstract: e show how e-ocrats and Repulicans con#er!ed to support si-ilar policies on a -a/or educational issue0 teacher effecti#eness. &ur study de-onstrates the i-portance of idea rokers 1actors that rid!e structural !aps etween -e-ers of different parties and pro-ote shared  policy ideas. &ur study is ased on analysis of testi-ony fro- '9( con!ressional hearin!s fro- )*** to )*'2. e use iscourse Network Analysis to e3a-ine network ties ased on shared  policy preferences e3pressed in hearin!s, which can e used to create networks linkin! policy actors and stated policy preferences. e use this network data to e3a-ine chan!es in the education policy susyste- durin! a policy window etween the 4ush ad-inistration and the &a-a ad-inistration. e identify idea rokers ased on network attriutes, includin!0 '5 actorsthat contriuted to the policy deate, and )5 actors that rid!ed structural !aps etween e-ocrats and Repulicans. e then esti-ate 6AP re!ression -odels to e3a-ine whether ties to idea rokers are associated with future policy preferences a-on! political actors. 1  Please direct correspondence to Sarah Reckhow, reckhow7-su.edu. Sarah Reckhow is assistant  professor in the epart-ent of Political Science at %ichi!an State "ni#ersity. Sarah Galey is Ph.. candidate in the Colle!e of 8ducation at %ichi!an State "ni#ersity. Joseph Ferrare is assistant professor in the epart-ent of 8ducational Policy Studies and the epart-ent of Sociolo!y at the "ni#ersity of entucky. e would like to thank the .:. Grant Foundation for supportin! this research. 1  Partisan affiliation is an endurin! and si!nificant factor for e3plainin! the structure of  political networks, includin! ca-pai!n contriutions, endorse-ents of le!islation, le!islati#e caucuses, interest !roup coalitions, and candidate endorse-ents ;Gross-ann and o-in!ue< )**9= >ictor and Rin!e )**9= Gi-pel, $ee, and Pearson?%erkowit< )**@5. Althou!h  ipartisanship see-s increasin!ly rare in the current conte3t of A-erican politics, a few policy areas ha#e e3perienced recent periods of relati#e ipartisan a!ree-ent, includin! educational  policy and prison refor- ;olrecht and artney )*'2= a!an and :eles )*'+5. Gi#en the nu-erous institutional and social di#isions fostered y partisan polari<ation, how do ideas tra#el  etween -e-ers of different parties to pro-ote new policy proposals with ipartisan supportB e e3plore the e-er!ence of new policy proposals concernin! teacher accountaility in education policy in order to understand how ideas are pro-oted that connect -e-ers of different parties. :eacher accountaility policies are desi!ned to hold indi#idual teachers accountale for student achie#e-ent, often y linkin! student test scores to teacher e#aluations. :his study uses discourse network analysis ;$eifeld )*'5 of testi-ony fro- '9( con!ressional hearin!s on teacher Duality fro- )*** to )*'2 as well as -ore than ** articles fro- the Wall Street Journal and the  New York Times  co#erin! the sa-e ti-e period. e analy<e how policy  preferences shifted fro- school?ased accountaility under the 4ush ad-inistration to teacher accountaility durin! the &a-a ad-inistration. &ur pro/ect ad#ances and tests the concept of anidea roker, uildin! on the concept of liaison rokera!e ;Gould and Fernande< '9@95. An idea  roker can en!a!e in the rokerin! process y connectin! -e-ers of different parties and introducin! new ideas into the policy deate. e show how connections to idea rokers in the education policy deate are associated with con#er!ent policy preferences a-on! political actors. Further, our analysis su!!ests that idea rokers -ay e -ost effecti#e durin! a ti-e 2   period when a policy window is open ;in!don '9@251in this case, durin! an election and shift to a new presidential ad-inistration, fro- )**@ to )**9. Althou!h our findin!s are preli-inary 1we are only e!innin! to fully e3a-ine the lon!itudinal and two?-ode aspects of our network data1these results su!!est a pro-isin! concept for future research. Policy Context: Fro !chool"based Accountability to #eacher"based Accountability For decades, the e-ocratic Party played a do-inant role in national education policy. Repulicans typically ar!ued that education should e left to the states, while e-ocrats supported -a/or federal pro!ra-s to ad#ance eDuity and increase fundin!, includin! :itle E of the8le-entary and Secondary 8ducation Act. urin! the '9@*s, -any states e!an to de#elop tests to track educational perfor-ance. 4y the '99*s, standards?ased tests eca-e the point of co-parison for ratin! and rankin! state educational syste-s ;Shipps )*''5. 4uildin! fro- these trends, the adoption No Child $eft 4ehind ;NC$45 under President 4ush codified test?ased accountaility y for-ally linkin! federal funds to educational outputs ;%connell )*'5.  NC$4 was adopted with road ipartisan support1rin!in! to!ether a Repulican ad-inistration and e-ocratic stalwarts, like Senator :ed ennedy. "nder NC$4, schools would e held accountale for student achie#e-ent outco-es. :his le!islation uilt upon a redefinition of educational issues ad#anced y oth -a/or political parties, which hi!hli!hted e3cellence and accountaility as the -echanis-s to address education issues, rather than e-phasi<in! fundin! ;olrecht and artney )*'25. A-on! other thin!s, NC$4 created sanctions for schools and districts that failed to achie#e adeDuate yearly pro!ress ased on student test perfor-ance ;%connell )*'5. Het it eca-e apparent early on that states and districts had li-ited resources to -eet the a-itious !oal of NC$4 to reach '** percent acade-ic proficiency y )*'?'2, forcin! the epart-ent of 8ducation to !rant wai#ers to 2 3  states that si!nificantly rela3ed -any of NC$4Is pro#isions ;".S. epart-ent of 8ducation )*'25.:he &a-a ad-inistration also positioned itself to ad#ance accountaility?ased policies.President &a-aIs Race to the :op ;R:::5 pro!ra- -aintained the !eneral course set y  NC$4, ut focused -ore on incenti#es and capacity?uildin!  usin! the carrot rather than the stick to -oti#ate refor- efforts ;%cGuinn )*')5. R::: authori<ed a K2.L4 co-petiti#e !rant pro!ra- that encoura!es states and districts to de#elop a-itious educational refor- a!endas, includin! co-prehensi#e lon!itudinal educational data syste-s to attach student achie#e-ent data to indi#idual teachers, the adoption of hi!h?Duality standards and assess-ents, the trainin! and retention of effecti#e educators, and turnin! around the lowest?perfor-in! schools and districts ;A-erican Reco#ery and Rein#est-ent Act of )**95. hile NC$4 focused on school?le#el accountaility, R::: e3pands federal and state attention towards teacher accountaility. :he focus on outco-es, specifically student achie#e-ent as a pri-ary indicator of teacher effecti#eness, in assessin! teacher Duality was a key co-ponent of R:::. &#er the past decade, and lar!ely in response to R:::, three?fourths of the states ha#e adopted teacher e#aluation syste-s that incorporate student !rowth -easures, as well as statewide data syste-s to keep track of student? and teacher?le#el data. %any states and districts now link teacher e#aluations to hi!h stakes personnel decisions, includin! tenure, perfor-ance pay, and firin!. :hese new teacher e#aluation syste-s ha#e ripple effects in districts and schools, which -ust rethink and reor!ani<e state and local teacher preparation and instructional policies. :he rise of accountaility as a do-inant approach to education policy helped lay the !roundwork for the teacher accountaility refor-s in R:::. Het in so-e respects, the shift to teacher?ased accountaility is surprisin!. First, concerns aout the unintended ne!ati#e 4  conseDuences of test?ased accountaility resultin! fro- NC$4 ;such as an o#ere-phasis on tested su/ects5 were already circulatin! durin! the latter years of the 4ush ad-inistration. Second, the e-phasis on holdin! teachers accountale is a #ery direct concern to a -a/or e-ocratic Party constituency0 teachers unions. Pre?') teachers are the lar!est occupational !roup in the country and well known for their hi!h le#els of en!a!e-ent in politics1policies that directly alter occupational practices and protections for teachers are unlikely to ad#ance without a -oili<ed response fro- teachers. e e3plore e3actly how and when these ideas in#ol#in! teacher accountaility e-er!ed in the national policy deate. %oreo#er, our analysis e3plicitly links specific policy ideas to specific actors, pro#idin! a fine !rained lon!itudinal analysis of the adoption of new preferences y elites in oth parties and the role of idea rokers. Networks o$ Actors and Ideas Political scientists ha#e used a #ariety of fra-eworks, such as paradi!-s ;all '99= %ehta )*'*5, road-aps or world#iews ;Goldstein and eohane '995, ideational politics ;Schul-an '9@@5, and policy i-a!es ;4au-!artner and Jones '995 to illu-inate actorsI idea?dri#en political acti#ities. En his influential study, eclo ;'9(@, '*)5 oser#es that participantsI  political and econo-ic interests were often secondary to intellectual or e-otional co--it-ents when for-in! political alliances  leadin! to the e-er!ence of issue networks.  Network theory also contriutes to this discussion, su!!estin! that   -odern political or!ani<ationse-phasi<e the sy-olic di-ensions of pulic policy. Policy actors tend to focus on shapin! and -anipulatin! policy sy-ols and ideas y, for e3a-ple, creatin! new knowled!e, influencin!  pulic opinion, and utili<in! opportunistic political strate!ies ;adushin )*')5.Essue networks can au!er sudden policy chan!e when they introduce new idea sets, or policy paradi!-s to policy susyste-s and refra-e policy deates ;%ehta )*'*5. Ef they 5
Search
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x