Documents

Bizantska mornarica

Description
Tekst o mornarici Bizanta.
Categories
Published
of 31
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  Byzantine navy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search   Byzantine Navy Participant in the Justinianic Wars, theByzantine–Arab Wars, the Byzantine–Bulgarian Wars, the Rus'–Byzantine Wars, the Crusaes an the Byzantine–!ttoman ars Active ##$–%&# Leaders Byzantine (mperor  )Commaner*in*chie+  Megas droungarios ,  Megas doux  )a+ter %%th century Headquarters Constantinople Area of operations -eiterranean .ea, /anube,  Blac0 .ea Strenth ca1 &2,$$$ men in 3441 5%6 ca1 #$$ arships in 4th–%$th centuries1 526 !art of  Byzantine (mpire riinated as Roman 7avy Allies 8enice, 9enoa, Pisa, Crusaer states, (mirate o+ Ayn pponents 8anals, !strogoths, the Caliphate an .aracen   pirates, .lavs, Bulgarians, Rus',  7ormans, 9enoa, 8enice, Pisa, Crusaer states, .el;u0s, Anatolian <ur0ish Beyli0s, !ttomans <he Byzantine navy  comprise the naval +orces o+ the Byzantine (mpire1 =i0e the empire it serve, it evelope irectly +rom its earlier imperial Roman counterpart, but in comparison ith its precursor playe a +ar greater role in the e+ense an survival o+ the state1 While the +leets o+ the Roman (mpire +ace +e great naval threats, operating as a policing +orce an vastly in+erior in po er an prestige to the legions, the sea as vital to the very e>istence o+ Byzantium, hich several historians have calle a ?maritime empire?1 5#6  <hroughout its history, the (mpire ha to e+en a long coastline, o+ten ith little hinterlan1 @n aition, shipping by sea as al ays the uic0est an cheapest ay o+ transport, an the (mpire's ma;or urban an commercial centers, as ell as its most +ertile areas, lay close to the sea1 5&6   7evertheless, the nature an limitations o+ the maritime technology o+ the age meant that the Byzantines coul not evelop a true thalassocracy1 Combine ith the traitional  preominance o+ the great Anatolian lan*holers in the higher military an civil o++ices, this meant that the navy, even at its height, as still regare largely as an a;unct to the lan +orces, a +act clearly illustrate by the relatively lo ly positions its amirals hel in the imperial hierarchy1 56  With the -uslim conuests +rom the th century on ars, the -eiterranean .ea cease  being a ?Roman la0e? an became a battlegroun bet een Byzantines an Arabs1 7ot only ere the Byzantine +leets critical in the e+ense o+ the (mpire's +ar*+lung possessions aroun the -eiterranean basin, but they also playe a ma;or role in the e+ense o+ the imperial capital o+ Constantinople +rom seaborne attac0s1 <hrough the use o+ ?9ree0 +ire?, the Byzantine navy's best*0no n an +eare secret eapon, Constantinople as save +rom several sieges an numerous naval engagements ere on +or the Byzantines1 <hus, by the early 4th century, the Byzantine navy, a ell*organize an maintaine +orce, as again the ominant maritime po er in the -eiterranean1 <he antagonism ith the -uslim navies continue until the %%th century, uring hich the navy, li0e the (mpire itsel+, began to ecline1rom that point on, the Byzantines ere +orce more an more to rely on the navies o+ allie @talian city*states li0e 8enice an 9enoa, ith isastrous e++ects on their economy an sovereignty1 Recovery uner the Domnenians  as +ollo e by another perio o+ ecline, hich culminate in the isastrous issolution o+ the (mpire by the ourth Crusae in %2$&1 A+ter the (mpire as restore in %2E%, several emperors o+ the Palaiologan ynasty trie to revive the navy, but their e++orts ha only a temporary e++ect1 By the mi*%&th century, the Byzantine +leet, hich once coul +iel hunres o+ arships, as limite to a +e ozen at  best1 5E6  <he iminishe navy ho ever continue to be active until the +all o+ the Byzantine (mpire to the !ttomans in %&#1 #ontents 5hie6  % Fistory  o %1% (arly perio   %1%1% Civil ars an barbarian invasions: the &th an th centuries  %1%12 <he Eth century – Justinian restores Roman control over the -eiterranean o %12 <he struggle against the Arabs   %121% <he emergence o+ the Arab naval threat  %1212 <he Byzantine counter*o++ensive  %121# Rene e -uslim ascenancy o %1# <he ?Byzantine Reconuest?   %1#1% <he reign o+ Basil @  %1#12 Arab rais uring the reign o+ =eo 8@  %1#1# <he recovery o+ Crete an the =evant o %1& Domnenian perio   %1&1% /ecline uring the %%th century  %1&12 Attempts at recovery uner Ale>ios @ an John @@  %1&1# <he naval e>peitions o+ -anuel @ o %1 /ecline   %11% <he Angeloi ynasty  %112 7icaea an the Palaiologan perio  2 !rganization  o 21% (arly perio )&th – mi*th centuries o 212 -ile perio )late th century – %$$s   2121% <he naval themes   21212 -anpo er an size  2121# Ran0 structure o 21# =ate perio )%$3$s – %&#   21#1% <he re+orms o+ the Domnenoi  21#12 <he navy o+ -ichael 8@@@ Palaiologos  # .hips  & <actics an eapons  o &1% 7aval tactics o &12 Armament o &1# 9ree0 +ire   Citations  E .ources an bibliography $edit% History $edit% &arly period $edit% #ivil 'ars and (ar(arian invasions) the *th and +th centuries By the late th century, the Western -eiterranean ha +allen in the hans o+ barbarian 0ingoms1 <he conuests o+ Justinian @ restore Roman control over the entire sea, hich oul last until the -uslim conuests in the latter hal+ o+ the th century1<he Byzantine navy, li0e the (ast Roman or Byzantine (mpire itsel+, as a continuation o+ the Roman (mpire an its institutions1 A+ter the Battle o+ Actium in #% BC, an in the absence  o+ any e>ternal threat, the Roman navy in the -eiterranean per+orme mostly policing an escort uties1 <he Roman +leets ere there+ore compose o+ relatively small vessels, best suite to these tas0s1 -assive sea battles, li0e those +ought in the Punic Wars, no longer occurre1 By the early &th century, the permanent Roman +leets ha  inle, so that hen the +leets o+ the rival emperors Constantine the 9reat an =icinius clashe in #2& A/, 56  they ere compose to a great e>tent o+ ne ly*built or commaneere ships +rom the port cities o+ the (astern -eiterranean1 536  <he civil ars o+ the &th an early th centuries i ho ever seea revival o+ naval activity, ith +leets mostly employe to transport armies, such as in #$, hen Constantius @@ saile against the usurper -agnentius, or in .tilicho's ars1 546  Consierable naval +orces continue to be employe in the Western -eiterranean throughoutthe +irst uarter o+ the +i+th century, especially +rom 7orth A+rica, but Rome's mastery o+ the -eiterranean as soon challenge, hen A+rica as overrun by the 8anals over a perio o+ +i+teen years1 5%$6 <he ne  8analic Dingom o+ Carthage, uner the capable 0ing 9eiseric, immeiately launche rais against the coasts o+ @taly an 9reece, even sac0ing an plunering Rome in &1 5%%6  <he 8anal rais continue over the ne>t t o ecaes, espite repeate Roman attempts to e+eat them1 5%%6  <he Western (mpire as impotent, its navy having  inle to almost nothing, 5%26  but the eastern emperors coul still call upon the resources an naval e>pertise o+ the (astern -eiterranean1 A +irst (astern e>peition in &&3 ho ever ent no +urther than .icily, an in &E$, the 8anals attac0e an estroye a Western Roman invasion +leet at Cartagena in .pain1 5%%6  inally, in &E3, a huge e>peition as assemble uner Basiliscus, reputely numbering %,%%# ships an %$$,$$$ men, but it +aile isastrously1 About E$$ ships ere lost, an the +inancial cost o+ %#$,$$$ pouns o+ gol an $$ pouns o+ silver nearly ban0rupte the (mpire1 5%#6  <his +orce the (mpire to come to terms ith 9eiseric, signing a peace treaty1 A+ter 9eiseric's eath in & ho ever, the 8anal threat recee1 5%&6 $edit% he -th century . /ustinian restores 0oman control over the 1editerranean @n $3, as antagonism ith the !strogothic Dingom o+ <heooric +lare up, the (mperor Anastasius @ )&4%–%3 sent a +leet o+ %$$ arships against the coasts o+ @taly1 5%6  @n %#, the magister militum per  Thracias , 8italian, revolte against (mperor Anastasius @1 <he rebels assemble a +leet o+ some 2$$ ships, but a+ter a +e successes, they ere estroye by amiral -arinus, ho employe an inceniary substance )possibly an early +orm o+ 9ree0 +ire to e+eat them1 5%E6 @n ##, ta0ing avantage o+ the absence o+ the 8anal +leet in .arinia, an army o+ %,$$$ uner Belisarius  as transporte to A+rica by an invasion +leet o+ 42 romons an $$ transports )the entire +leet as manne by #$,$$$ men, 5%6  beginning the 8analic War , the +irst o+ the Wars o+ Reconuest o+ (mperor Justinian @ )2–E1 <hese ere largely amphibious operations, mae possible by the control o+ the -eiterranean ater ays, an the+leet playe a vital role in carrying supplies an rein+orcements to the iely isperse Byzantine e>peitionary +orces an garrisons1 5%E6  <his +act as not lost on the Byzantines' enemies1 Alreay in the 2$s, <heooric ha planne +or a massive +leet builup irecte against the Romans an the 8anals, but his eath in 2E limite the e>tent o+ these plans1 5%36  @n #, the 9othic War  began by a ouble*pronge o++ensive, ith a +leet again carrying Belisarius' army to .icily an then @taly1 Roman control o+ the sea as o+ great strategic importance, an allo e the smaller Roman army to success+ully occupy the peninsula by &$1 5%46
Search
Similar documents
Tags
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks