Documents

Mobile radiation scare in Jaipur.pdf

Description
Description:
Categories
Published
of 3
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  6/10/2018 Down To Earthhttp://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/mobile-radiation-scare-in-jaipur-38427 1/3  | undefined Mobile radiation scare in Jaipur Ank ur Paliwal @Ankur_paliSaturday 30 June 2012XRajasthan says levels within permissible limit. Critics claim even ‘safe’ levels are harmfulPhoto: Ankur PaliwalSUDHIR KASLIWAL has been living in a Jaipur colony with his family since the 1970s. A jeweller by profession, his life was going smooth until last year when one of his two brothers was diagnosed with braintumour. He was rushed to Mumbai for treatment. Then his other brother was also detected with brain tumour.“His doctor enquired about our surroundings. When we told him there are three cell phone towers within 20metres of our house, he cautioned us,” says Kasliwal. Around the same time, his dog fell victim to cancer. In another colony of Jaipur was Hameeda Patel who succumbed to cervical cancer last month. The 53-year-old used to live with her family in a one-room flat on the first floor. The room is 50 metres away from a building that has a cell phone tower and four antennas. “She was the first cancer patient in our family,” saysher son. Since 2010, five persons have died of cancer and five are battling the disease in Patel’s colony thathas about 15 cell phone towers. These are some instances of the health scare that has engulfed Rajasthan’s capital. Although there is noconclusive evidence to prove that electromagnetic radiations (EMR) emitted by antennas on cell phonetowers are causing cancer, there could be a link. All the cancer patients in the areas Down To Earth visitedwere the first in their generation to suffer from the disease and were diagnosed after towers were erected intheir vicinity. The increasing number of cancer cases has people worried. On February 24, two people filed a petition in theRajasthan High Court. They urged the court to take action against cell phone service providers and theregulatory authorities. On May 31, the court formed a committee to monitor EMR in the city for a month andsubmit report with suggestions (for more, see Mobile tower risks: Rajasthan High Court issues notice totelecom operators ). To further address public concerns, the state government organised a workshop on June 2, which wasattended by technical and medical experts. “The cancer cases are a mere coincidence. There are multiplecauses of cancer like pollution and lifestyle changes,” says Rajesh Pasricha, senior consultant, department of radiotherapy, Bhagwan Mahaveer Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Jaipur. There is no conclusiveevidence to show that EMR is responsible for cancer, he adds. Officials from the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) say the radiation levels in Jaipur are below the permissible limit. Mahidhar Pant, deputy director general, Telecom Enforcement Resource and Monitoring(TERM) cell, Jaipur, says, “We are required to randomly monitor EMR of 10 per cent of the 5,678 towers inthe city annually. We have never found EMR beyond the permissible limit.” But there is no independentverification of the TERM readings, points out Prakash Munshi, an anti-radiation activist in Mumbai.  6/10/2018 Down To Earthhttp://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/mobile-radiation-scare-in-jaipur-38427 2/3 Precautions taken  Although there is no conclusiveproof that electromagneticradiations (EMR) from cellphone towers affect health,many countries have takenprecautionary steps. In Italy thepermissible EMR is 1 Watt perm2, but in sensitive areas likeresidential areas, schools andhospitals it is 0.1 Watt per m2.Similar is the case inSwitzerland where thecountrywide limit is 4.5 Wattper m2 while in sensitive areasit is 0.042 Watt per m2. Nationslike Russia, Bulgaria and Polandare playing it safer. They haverestricted the limit to 0.1 Wattper m2   When less is bad Even at permissible level, EMR could hurt people. After doctor’s caution, Kasliwal had his house tested for EMR. “The levels were high in the rooms occupied by his brothers, but were within permissible limits,” saysGirish Kumar, professor in the electrical engineering department at IIT-Bombay, who measured the radiation.How can radiation level within the permissible limit be harmful? Indiafollows the norms of International Commission on Non IonizingRadiation Protection (ICNIRP), Kumar says. It is an independentscientific body that provides guidance on the health hazards of non-ionising radiation exposure. V K Vijay, director of the Centre for Development of Physics andEducation in the University of Rajasthan, sheds more light. “EMR arenon-ionising radiations. They have electrical and magnetic field, but nocharge. On contact, the field affects the normal dynamics of the human body. But the exact effect is not known,” he says. According to ICNIRP, the permissible limit for exposure is 4.5 Watt per m2. The reading in Kasliwal’s house was about 0.005 Watt per m2.“Consistent exposure of even 0.001 Watt per m2 is harmful,” saysKumar. Besides cancer, such exposure can damage DNA. “Peoplecomplain of problems like sleep disorders and hypertension,” he adds.He cites a study conducted in Germany from 1994 to 2004 which founda threefold increase in cancer risk after five years’ exposure toradiations from a cell phone tower at a distance of 400 metres. “At thisrange, the radiation would be 0.00008 Watt per m2,” says Kumar. In countries which follow ICNIRP like Russia, Italy and Poland, the permissible limits are 0.1, 1 and 0.1Watt per m2, respectively (see ‘Precautions taken’). Kumar says the ICNIRP guidelines are intended to protect people from the short-term heating effects and not from biological effects of long-term low-levelexposure from towers. Jaipur has 5,678 cell phone towers An expert group commissioned by the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests last year to study thecountrywide impact of EMR on birds found the exposure was reducing the number of birds and hurting bees’egg production. “If birds are getting affected by the radiations, then humans can also be at risk,” says Kumar.Many international studies also show harmful effects of EMR on health. For example, a study conducted between 1996 and 2006 in a Brazil municipality showed that mortality rate due to neoplasia (abnormal cellgrowth) was higher for people within an area of 500-metre from cell phone base stations. However WHO, which reviewed 1,000 studies on the health effects of EMR, says there is no convincingscientific evidence to confirm that low radiation from cell phone towers affects health. The InternationalAgency for Research on Cancer classifies EMR as a possible carcinogen because of limited proof. Noconvincing evidence does not mean no evidence, says Kumar. “We agree that it is a matter of research. Buttill then should we keep getting ourselves exposed to harmful EMR?” asks Kasliwal. Last year, an inter-ministerial committee formed by DoT on EMR had recommended reducing the permissible limit by one tenth (0.45 Watt per m2). It is supposed to be implemented by September. But  6/10/2018 Down To Earthhttp://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/mobile-radiation-scare-in-jaipur-38427 3/3 Cellular Operators Association of India says the recommendation has no scientific basis. Lack of regulation  An official of the state Urban Development and Housing (UDH) department says initially there was norestriction on the number of cell phone towers to ensure best connectivity to people. As a result, discoms setup towers indiscriminately. “Even we do not know of their possible harmful effects,” he says. But for thesake of regulation, the government made model cell phone tower bylaws in 2010. These bylaws with a fewmodifications were made mandatory in September last year. Besides TERM, Jaipur Municipal Corporation is also supposed to monitor towers every month, but it hardlydoes. The country has no official guidelines on the height of tower, distance between towers and distancefrom houses. “The towers are put based on radio-planning where we take care of all these issues,” says Pantof TERM. G S Sandhu, principal secretary, UDH, says, “We are looking into the matter and would soonrelease guidelines.” Move from news to views and get in-depth reports on issues that matter to you, every fortnight.   Subscribe now » We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent,credible and fearless.   You can further help us by making a donation.  This will mean a lot for our abilityto bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Search
Tags
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x