Travel & Places

A morphophonological parameter hierarchy for Amuzgo glottalization classes

A morphophonological parameter hierarchy for Amuzgo glottalization classes
of 23
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  A morphophonological parameter hierarchy for Amuzgo glottalization classes *** Draft version April 19, 2015 – please contact before citing ***Yuni KimUniversit of !anc"ester uni#$im%manc"ester#ac#u$  §1Introduction &nflectional mar$ing of person an' number in Amu(go, an )astern to+!anguean language of t"e aaca+-uerrero coastal bor'er region in sout"ern !eico, involves various stem+internal morp"op"onological alternations, most notabl in glottali(ation patterns an' in tone# .ot" can  be seen in t"e completive para'igm of t"e verb + t   j iʔ-  /put insi'e in 1#13ompletive forms of + t   j iʔ-  /put insi'e 4apia -arca n#'#6 7201sg#t  8 i 5: 1ecl#t  8 i 12 1incl#t  8 i 51 2sg#t  8 i 51 2pl#t  8 i 1 :sg#t  8 i :; :pl#t  8 i 1 &n 1, t"e se<uencing of t"e glottali(ation gesture varies b person categor# All of t"e first+person forms "ave rimes t"at consist of larngeali(e' vo=els, transcribe' as >i?, ="ile secon'+ an' t"ir'+person forms en' in >i?, t"at is, mo'al vo=els follo=e' b a glottal stop# 4ones, mar$e' =it" superscript numbers 1@lo=, 5@"ig", also c"ange accor'ing to person an' number Kim, to appear#4"is eample illustrates t"e fact t"at leical entries of Amu(go verbs contain t=o 'istinct sets of inflection+class information, one for glottali(ation an' anot"er for tone# 4"e forms in 1 s"o= 8ust one of several possible patterns of para'igmatic alternations in glottali(ation# i$e=ise, t"e tones represent 8ust one of at least 15 possible tonal inflectional classes, ="ose members"ip cannot be pre'icte' from ot"er factors# As s"o=n b Kim to appear, t"e glottali(ation an' tone classes furt"ermore 'o not correlate =it" eac" ot"erB t"e are cross+classifing#ur aim "ere =ill be to ma$e some sense of t"e Amu(go inventor of glottali(ation classes, ="ic" at first glance ma loo$ rat"er ran'om# Ce focus on t"e variet of an Ee'ro Amu(gos, aaca & F:9+:6 a(g# 4"e onl previous c"aracteri(ation of t"e glottali(ation classes is foun' in .uc$ 2000B a lig"tl revise' version of t"is is also use' in Kim to appear# 4"e analsis presente' "ere is base' primaril on an etensive manuscript b Germn 4apia -arca, ="ic" lists t"e con8ugations of over 1000 verbs an' ot"er inflectable roots across person, number, an' 4A! categories 4apia -arca n#'## Hoint revie= of parts of t"is manuscript b 4apia -arca an' mself, inclu'ing proofrea'ing an' au'io recor'ing, too$  place in an Ee'ro Amu(gos in 2012 an' 201:# Giel'=or$ =it" ot"er native spea$ers =as con'ucte' in 2010, 2012, an' 201:, an' confirms a "ig" 'egree of consistenc bot" =it" 4apia -arca n#'# an' =it" t"e & materials te=art I te=art 2000, .uc$ 2000#4"e table in 2 summari(es t"e full set of pro'uctive glottali(ation patterns foun' in t"e 'ata# &n t"e top ro=, it inclu'es t"e ne= class labels t"at =ill be propose' in t"is paper# 4"e table sc"emati(es sllable rimes, ="ic" are t"e locus of t"e alternations# ince first+ person eclusive an' inclusive forms never 'iffer in glottali(ation =it"in a para'igm, for our 1   purposes t"e =ill be conflate' into a first+person plural 1pl# cell#2Amu(go glottali(ation classes3lassa 1b 2c :' ;e 51sg#JJJJJJ2sg#JJJJJ:sg#JJJJJ1pl#JJJJJJ2pl#JJJJJ:pl#JJJJJ4"e JL in 3lasses 1, 2, an' 5 s"oul' be rea' as J or JL6 specificall, t"ese t"ree  patterns are foun' bot" on verbs t"at "ave a consistentl non+larngeali(e' vo=el J t"roug"out t"e para'igm, an' on verbs t"at "ave a consistentl larngeali(e' vo=el J# 4"e essence of 3lasses 1, 2, an' 5 lies in t"e alternating presence an' absence of subse<uent segments# &n contrast, t"e 3lass : an' ; patterns in 2c' are 'efine' b para'igmatic alternations bet=een non+larngeali(e' an' larngeali(e' vo=els#4"e main i'ea of t"is paper is t"at t"e Amu(go glottali(ation+class sstem can be un'erstoo' in terms of a "ierarc" of morp"op"onological parameters, ="ic" 'efine all an' onl t"e five pro'uctive classes# 4"e approac" follo=s feature+base' analses of inflectional class structure suc" as 4rommer 200M an' Aleia'ou I !Nller 200M# & argue t"at it is  possible to posit un'erling forms plus a limite' set of operations t"at 'erive t"e stem alternations, in a =a t"at 'evelops a t"eor of internal relations"ips among t"e glottali(ation classes# 4=o $e claims are ma'e# Girst, =e recogni(e a 'istinction bet=een leical an' inflectional glottal stops6 in ot"er =or's, glottal stops t"at are present in un'erling representations, as oppose' to glottal stops t"at ma be concatenate' as part of morp"ological operations t"at are specific to certain inflectional classes# 4"is 'istinction solves some  problems in t"e eisting analsis b .uc$ 2000, ="ere glottali(ation+class 'istinctions are 'efine' as sets of operations – inclu'ing subtractive operations – on t"ir'+person stems, ="ic" are assume' erroneousl, as =ill be argue' to represent un'erling forms#Jaring patterns of glottal+stop concatenation 'o not suffice to 'efine all of t"e glottali(ation+class 'istinctions# 4"e secon' ma8or claim is t"at glottali(ation classes are also c"aracteri(e' b 'iffering sets of p"onological processes# 4"is results in a sort of 'ual morp"ologicall con'itione' p"onolog6 a p"onological process can be triggere' not 8ust =it"in a certain morp"ological construction, but also b a morp"oleical inflection+class specification# Gor eample, t"e 'istinction bet=een 3lasses 2 an' : can be un'erstoo' as non+application versus application of a glottal 'issimilation process# C"ile a greater 'egree of abstraction ma eventuall permit analses of t"e putative p"onological operations as morp"ologicall concatenative follo=ing e#g# 4rommer 2011, t"e analsis presente' "ere in'ees 'ifferent cop"onologies &n$elas I Ooll 2007 to 'ifferent inflectional classes# &n a sense =e preserve t"e insig"t of .uc$ 2000 t"at glottali(ation classes are c"aracteri(e' b morp"op"onological operations, but =e present a novel vie= of ="at t"e operations are#4"e structure of t"e paper is as follo=s# .rief bac$groun' information on t"e language is provi'e' in P2# &n P:, =e give an overvie= of t"e propose' parameter "ierarc", setting out 2  t"e 'ivision of labor bet=een un'erling forms an' morp"op"onological operations in t"e  pro'uction of t"e observe' para'igms# &n particular, =e set up t"e concept of leical versus inflectional glottal stops# 4"e follo=ing sections provi'e concrete illustrations of eac" glottali(ation class, 8ustifing an' formali(ing t"e analsis of morp"op"onological processes in more 'etail6 P; focuses on t"e 'istinctions among 3lasses 1, 2, an' :, ="ic" cover t"e un'erlingl vo=el+final roots, ="ile P5 turns to 3lasses ; an' 5, ="ic" are argue' to be t"e t=o possible inflectional patterns on un'erlingl glottal+final roots# &n PF, =e conclu'e b  pointing out some successful pre'ictions of t"e propose' analsis in comparison =it" .uc$ 2000 an' some ot"er conceivable alternatives# §2Background on Amuzgo Amu(go is spo$en b t"e ma8orit of resi'ents in t"e municipalit of an Ee'ro Amu(gos, ="o numbere' about F500 in t"e 2010 census, alt"oug" t"ere are signs t"at it is not being activel ac<uire' b all c"il'ren# Erevious =or$ on Amu(go of an Ee'ro Amu(gos inclu'es an & 'ictionar te=art I te=art 2000 an' accompaning s$etc" grammar .uc$ 2000, as =ell as =or$ b t"e native spea$er linguist Germn 4apia -arca =it" 4"omas mit"+tar$, inclu'ing a 'ictionar 4apia -arca 1999 an' analses of tone mit"+tar$ I 4apia -arca 19M; an' morp"osnta mit"+tar$ I 4apia -arca 2002# 4"roug"out t"e paper, tones =ill be mar$e' =it" superscript numbers# 4"e an Ee'ro Amu(gos variet of Amu(go "as t"e eig"t contrastive tones liste' an' 'escribe' in :, of ="ic" onl t"e five asteris$e' ones are eploite' for inflectional purposes# 4"e numbers matc" mit"+tar$ I 4apia -arcas 19M; labelling sc"eme, =it" t"e eception of t"eir Q:1R tone, ="ic" & ren'er as Q51R follo=ing .uc$s 2000 alto-bajo  /"ig"+lo= 'esignation, an' on t"e basis of evi'ence for t"is representation as argue' for b Kim, to appear#:4ones of an Ee'ro Amu(gos Amu(go5"ig" level:5mi'+"ig" rising5:*"ig"+mi' falling:;mi' rising51*"ig"+lo= falling:*mi'12*lo= rising1*lo=* @ use' in tonal inflection&n terms of larngeal p"onotactics, Amu(go allo=s si tpes of sllable rimes, s"o=n in ;# A vo=el can be mo'al, breat", or larngeali(e', an' t"e onl possible co'a consonant is a glottal stop# 1 ;Son+larngeali(e' Jarngeali(e' J So co'aJ"JJGinal J"JJ.reat" an' larngeali(e' vo=els are ren'ere' as "J an' J, respectivel, in approimate accor'ance =it" t"eir p"onetics# i$e in ot"er to+!anguean languages, it is necessar to implement p"onation an' tone contrasts on a single vo=el, but t"eir p"onetic 1Sasali(e' vo=els are usuall pronounce' =it" an ecrescent nasal consonant, e#g# >Tm? for T, but t"ese  postvocalic nasals are not p"onologicall contrastive# :  incompatibilit causes t"em to be reali(e' in se<uence rat"er t"an simultaneousl6 non+mo'al  p"onation in t"e first part of t"e vo=el, t"en tone in t"e secon' ilverman 1997# !ost of our 'iscussion =ill abstract a=a from breat"iness, ="ic" 'oes not pla an active role in t"e glottali(ation class sstem, an' use JL as a sc"emati(ation referring to all non+larngeali(e' vo=els#4=o furt"er bac$groun' notes s"oul' be ma'e# Alt"oug" =e concentrate on stem alternations in glottali(ation, t"e eponents of person mar$ing a''itionall inclu'e tone, affiation, an' vo=el+<ualit alternations, ="ic" =ill be mentione' ="ere relevant but =ill not receive eten'e' analsis# Also, t"e person+mar$ing sstem 'escribe' in t"is paper is use' =it" transitive verbs, intransitive verbs =it" agentive sub8ects see .uc$ 20006;15ff#, mit"+tar$ I 4apia -arca 2002, an' in possessive mar$ing in a close' class of closel possesse' nouns# &n non+agentive intransitive verbs, person inflection uses a 'ifferent sstem of mar$ing ="ere no stem alternations are involve'# §3Underlying forms and lexical versus inflectional glottal stops 4"e goal of t"is section is to posit un'erling root s"apes for eac" glottali(ation class# 4"e UVs serve as a starting point for un'erstan'ing structural commonalities an' 'ifferences  bet=een t"e glottali(ation patterns# 4"e tas$ is nontrivial, since for most classes, t"ere is no imme'iatel obvious null "pot"esis as to ="ic" s"ape – if in'ee' an – is un'erling, an' ="ic" ot"er s"apes "ave been 'erive' from it b morp"op"onological operations# Eer"aps t"e best place to start is 3lass 1, ="ere onl t"e 2sg# form 'iffers from t"e ot"ers# 4"e 3lass 1 column, along =it" t"e ro= s"o=ing 2sg# forms across classes, is  bol'face' in 5#53lass 1 an' 2sg# forms3lass1 + !"# 2:;51sg# !"# JJJJJ2sg# !"#!!"#!#!#!!"#! :sg# !"# JJJJ1pl# !"# JJJJJ2pl# !"# JJJJ:pl# !"# JJJJGor 3lass 1, a simple ma8orit rulesL metric points to an un'erling J or J root# 4"is root surfaces unc"ange' ecept in t"e 2sg# form, ="ic" a''s a glottal stop + ʔ  # 4"us, t"e onl glottali(ation operation t"at applies in 3lass 1 is concatenation of a 2sg# suffi + ʔ  # C"en =e loo$ at t"e full set of glottali(ation classes, =e a''itionall observe t"at t"e 2sg# forms en' in a glottal stop across t"e boar'# 4"is fact suggests t"at a 2sg# suffi + ʔ ma be foun' in all classes, strengt"ening t"e case for its eistence as an inflectional ob8ect# Ce =ill a'opt t"e  position t"at t"e 2sg# + ʔ is in'ee' present in all para'igms, even t"oug" t"is turns out not to be a straig"tfor=ar' claim, as 'iscusse' s"ortl#4"e remain'er of t"is section =ill establis" a basic 'istinction bet=een classes ="ere un'erling roots are leicall vo=el+final 3lasses 1, 2, an' : versus glottal+stop final 3lasses ; an' 5# 4"is 'ivision, 'espite being base' on p"onological rat"er t"an ;  morp"ological criteria, can be t"oug"t of as t"e first parameter t"at gives structure to t"e glottali(ation+class sstem#FGirst parameter cut6 leical stem s"apeJ+final+final W W3l# 1, 2, :3l# ;, 5Assuming t"e un'erling root s"apes in 7 – ="ere 3lasses 1, 2, an' : "ave vo=el+final roots, ="ile 3lasses ; an' 5 "ave glottal stop+final ones – t"e bol'face' cells in eac" column in'icate t"e forms in ="ic" morp"ological operations must be responsible for t"e appearance of an alternation in glottali(ation pattern#7Un'erling root s"apes for eac" class3lass 1 $ !"#2 $ !"#3 $ !#% $ #!& $ !"#! 1sg#JJJ !#!"#!# 2sg# !"#!!"#!#! JJ:sg#J !"#!#! JJ1pl#JJJ !#!"#!# 2pl#JJJJJ:pl#JJJJJGor t"e J+final roots in 3lasses 1, 2, an' :, t"e onl possible operations involve insertion of final glottal stops in t"e 2sg# an'or :sg forms# Gor t"e +final roots in 3lasses ; an' 5, all an' onl t"e first+person forms in bot" singular an' plural are 'erive'# 4"us, a generali(ation enable' b t"is analsis of un'erling forms is t"at t"e un'erling root s"ape i#e# ="et"er J+final or +final alrea' constrains t"e possible patterns of stem allomorp"# An issue t"at arises at t"is point is ambiguit about t"e true stem s"ape of t"e 2sg# forms in 3lasses 2+5# 4o t"e etent t"at a 2sg# suffi -ʔ is "pot"esi(e', it is not clear ="et"er t"e final >? in t"ese forms is 'ue to a +final stem, or to t"e 2sg# suffi# )vi'ence t"at t"e 2sg# stems can still be anal(e' as +final, in'epen'entl of t"e 2sg# suffi, comes from tonal inflection# 4"e 'ata in M s"o= t"e t=o most common patterns of tonal inflection in singular  para'igms# 4oget"er, t"ese surface patterns account for over "alf of all sample' para'igms in Kim to appear, but t"e are in complementar 'istribution6 Ma is foun' onl on verbs ="ose :sg# forms are vo=el+final i#e# glottali(ation class 1, ="ile Mb is foun' onl on verbs ="ose :sg# forms are +final i#e# glottali(ation classes 2+5#M4onal evi'ence for stem+final glottal stops in 2sg# formsa# Default tones, 3lass 1b# Default tones, 3lasses 2+51sg#tX 5: Q5:RtX 5: Q5:R2sg#tX 5: Q5:RtX 51 Q51R:sg#tX :; tX 51 /smell, in"ale completive/brea$, split completiveKim to appear anal(es bot" patterns in M as reflees of t"e same un'erling 5
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks