Documents

A Petition for Restitution of Conjugal Rights Us 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955-1111

Description
Original petition for restitution of conjugal rights
Categories
Published
of 4
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  A PETITION FOR RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS U/S 9 OF THEHINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DELHIAT DELHI Marriage Petition No. __./ 200_ Mr. Anand Kapoor, age- 30 yrs, occupation- Service, r/o- De!i . Petitioner#ersusMrs. Ne!a Kapoor, age- 2$ yrs, occupation- Service, r/o- %angaore . &espondent U/S 9 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955  '!e petitioner respect(uy su)*its as under+.  '!at t!e petitioner is t!e !us)and o( t!e respondent,t!eir *arriage !aving )een soe*nied at De!i on2-0-20according to t!e indu reigion, vaidic rites and cere*onies. 1tas a ove *arriage and )ot! o( t!eir parents ere agreed. 2.'!at Ne!a as oring in %angaore, !ie Mr. Anand asoring in De!i ti *arriage.3.A(ter *arriage t!ey continued t!e ong distance reations!ip (or year, !osoever t!ey !ad sudden disputes t!at )ot! o( t!e* ereoring in di4erent paces. 5ne ased anot!er to *ove.6.'!at 7nay a(ter ong dispute, Ne!a !ad to ive t!e 8o) and s!e*oved to De!i, a(ter t!at s!e coudn9t 7nd t!e 8o) o( !er (ocus area inDe!i, !ic! is pu)ic !eat!, )ut s!e coudn9t 7nd t!e 8o) in De!i!ic! sustain !er.$.'!at in %angaore s!e as earning a saary o( &s 0,000 per  *ont!, and, *a: s!e as o4ered in De!i as $0000 and t!e 8o) asnot speci7c to !er area, so s!e !ad to su4er *a8or pay cut. %ecause o( !ic! !er saary e:pectation !as to )e reduced )ecause a(ter !ic! i( s!e *ove to anot!er 8o) s!e need to eep.'!at (or t!ose  *ont! s!e as econo*icay and 7nanciaydependent on !er !us)and, a(ter t!at s!e got 8o) o( $0,000.S!e eaveda avis! i(e in %angaore, s!e ant to dine a ot, !ie s!e aeges t!at,!en !e *arried !er, anand nos t!at s!e goes out a ot, so it asnot ne to !i*,no s!e is dependent on !us)and so s!e need *oney (ro* !us)and todine a ot..'!at during t!ese  *ont!s Anand *aintained !er and a(ter t!ats!e got t!e 8o) in !ic! s!e !ad to su4er paycut and t!e o;ce asaay (ro* t!e !ouse s!e use to ive, )ecause o( !ic! t!ere as so*eind o( ver)a 7g!t )eteen t!e*, !ic! is very nor*a in every*arried (a*iy.<.'!at a(ter t!e ver)a 7g!t t!e pro)e* o( t!e !o*e coud !avesoved a(ter taing to eac! ot!er. %ut a(ter t!at 7g!t it!out trying toresove t!e con=ict s!e *aied !er >.(or*er e*poyer and re?uested to get !er od 8o) )ac, and t!eyo4ered !er e*poy*ent on t!e sa*e 8o), sa*e, position, sa*e saaryand s!e *oved to %angaore, )ut t!e parent o( Anand as in aryanaso !e need to visit t!eir parent, so !e re(uses to go to %angaore ands!e aso re(uses to co*e De!i )y rong(uy aeging t!at !e as s!ortte*per, and s!e !ad to su4er ver)a !arass*ent. %ut s!e didn9t 7eany co*paint.0.'!at parents o( Anand is in od age )ecause o( !ic! it is notpossi)e (or !i* to eave !is parents and *ove to %angaore it! !isi(e, as !e need to tae care o( !is parents !o use to ive in aryana..  '!at t!e petitioner su)*its t!at !e as rig!t (ro*t!e )eginning and !as ever since )een sincere, ready  and iing to co!a)it it! t!e respondent, and t!erespondent )eing !is egay edded i(e !as no rig!t orreason or ground to eave !i* aone. 2.'!at t!e *arriage as soe*nied at De!i, and t!eparties !ereto aso ast resided toget!er it!in t!e oca i*itso( t!e 8urisdiction o( t!is court, and !ence t!is on@)e ourt!as 8urisdiction to try and decide t!is petition.3.'!at t!e cause o( action (or t!is petition 7rst arose on 2< t! Dec, 20, !en t!e respondent vountariy deserted t!ispetitioner and e(t !is society it! a vie to )reaing aay t!e*atri*onia tries, and !ence, t!is petition 7ed today is eit!in i*itation.6.'!at t!e petitioner aso decares and con7r*s t!at t!ispetition presented )y !i* is not cousive.$.'!at t!is petition )eing c!argea)e it! a 7:ed rate o( court (ee, t!e sa*e is paid !ereit!..'!at t!e petitioner, t!ere(ore, prays t!at BCaA decree (or t!e restitution o( con8uga rig!ts )epassed against t!e respondent, and s!e )e directed toresu*e co!a)itation it! t!is petitioner, andC)C) Any ot!er orders in t!e interest o( 8ustice )e indypassed.De!i,Sd/- Anand KapoorDated + 2-0<-20< .PE'1'15NE& Sd/- c AD#5A'E F5& PE'1'15NE&  VERIFICATION 1, Mr. Anand Kapoor, t!e present petitioner, do !ere)y state onsoe*n a;r*ation t!at t!e contents o( t!is petition in paras  to$ are true and correct to t!e )est o( *y 3no2edge and )eie(, andso 1 !ave signed !ereunder.Sd/- Anand Kapoor . PE'1'15NE&

Group VI.pptx

Dec 14, 2018

Nitoproof-30

Dec 14, 2018
Search
Similar documents
View more...
Tags
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks