The Development of an Experience-based Documentation System for Maintenance Workers in Germany- Alan Brown, Graham Attwell, Martin Fischer, Martin Owen

The Development of an Experience-based Documentation System for Maintenance Workers in Germany Martin Fischer, Institut für Technik und Bildung, University of Bremen, Wilhelm Herbst Strasse 7, 28359 Bremen, Germany Tel: + 49 421 218 4626 E-mail: Graham Attwell, Institut für Technik und Bildung, University of Bremen, Wilhelm Herbst Strasse 7, 28359 Bremen, Germany Tel: + 49 421 218 4626 E-mail: Abstract: This paper is one of a pair describing attempts
of 8
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  The Development of an Experience-based Documentation System for MaintenanceWorkers in Germany Martin Fischer,  Institut für Technik und Bildung, University of  Bremen, Wilhelm Herbst Strasse 7, 28359 Bremen, GermanyTel: + 49 421 218 4626  E-mail: Graham Attwell,  Institut für Technik und Bildung, University of  Bremen, Wilhelm Herbst Strasse 7, 28359 Bremen, GermanyTel: + 49 421 218 4626  E-mail: Alan Brown,  Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England Tel: + 44 1203 523512 E-mail:  Martin Owen, School of Education, University of Wales: Bangor, Bangor Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, Wales,United KingdomTel: + 44 1248 382943 E-mail:  Abstract : This paper is one of a pair describing attempts to devisestrategies for the effective implementation of continuingprofessional development for work-oriented communitiesof practice in Europe. The paper will outline thedevelopment of DIADOSYS: an experience-baseddocumentation system for maintenance workers inGermany. The German discussion about experience-guided work has led to the question of how workexperience can be used within the process of designingdecision-support systems for skilled maintenance work.Some considerations about the nature of experience andabout the problems skilled workers have in acquiringwork competences within computer aided productionenvironments are introduced in order to illustrate thedesign philosophy of DIADOSYS: a decision-support-system which stimulates workplace learning by enablingprevious and present users of the system, includingmaintenance staff and shop floor workers, to exchangeand build on experience.The system is designed so the users from the shop floorthemselves can fill in the information which is needed atwork. One reason for the implementation of informationsystems on the shop floor is the high innovation rate andthe rapid change in machinery and technical componentswithin factories. Information about technology beingstored in shop floor information systems has to beconstantly kept up to date. Therefore shop floor personnelshould have the opportunity to develop the knowledgebase of an information system. This means opening upthe design process for the shop floor workers, not only inrelation to the user interface but also in terms of thefunctionality of the system. Introductory discussion about experience-guided work Before describing the experience-based documentationsystem itself, it is worth putting the development into thecontext of discussions about experience-guided work andhow work experience can be used within the process of designing decision-support systems for skilledmaintenance work. Until recently German discussions onchanges in skilled work were influenced by thepresumption of work becoming increasingly abstract, andthe importance of theory-guided systematically-preconsidering behaviour at work [14]. The traditional,experience-oriented learning and practice srcinatingfrom the handicraft trades seemed in an irreversibledecline. However, experience is witnessing arenaissance [4; 16] and has been influential in shaping  work and technology [7]. Discussion of 'experience' isrelevant here to show the relation between experience andthe design philosophy for the DIADOSYS experience-based documentation system for maintenance workers.To command experience is a matter of the pastreaching into the present. Aristotle pointed out: .. manymemories of the same object generate the capacity of anexperience.. [2]. He also suggests that experienceemanates from the sensory perception imparted bymemory. In the process of developing experience,concepts of past events are remembered and modified.While 'experience making' therefore a person issimultaneously aware of the object he/she is experiencingand of her/his knowledge of this object. The process of experience-making (i.e. a new experience on the qualityof the object of experience) presupposes a discrepancybetween the object as currently experienced and itsprevious image, and leads to a process of revision oramendment with the end result that the individual hasexperienced a new facet of the object.The dialectic term of experience introduced here,which implies experience-making as an act of reception(reception of the object) and at the same time as an act of production (production of the enriched images of anobject), was first articulated by Hegel: this dialecticmovement that consciousness is performing on itself, notonly on its knowledge but also on its object, insofar thenew true object emanates thereof, is in principle what iscalled experience. [13].It seems as if there are empirical proofs for Hegel'soutline of his concept. Rubinstein, for example, reports: experienced grinders are able to distinguish spaces of one to two thousandth of a millimetre of width with thenaked eye, whereas human beings are usually only able todistinguish spaces of one hundredth of a millimetre. Steelfounders can perceive even the finest shades of the lightbrown colour which are indicators for the foundingtemperatures. Workers in pottery and china industrieswho have to determine the quality of their productsaccording to their sound, develop a sensitive 'technicalear'. [21].It is neither the somewhat naive, immediate sensoryperception which is producing such a performance, nor isit a subject developing concepts independently from theobjective world. Sensory perception enriched byexperience stands above inexperienced perception [18]and shows experience as both reception of the objectiveand production of enriched concepts of the object. Whenexperiencing the world, the formative process of experience simultaneously absorbs views and ideas,thoughts and emotions. Experience is the sensorypersonal experiencing of an objective reality, but it isexperiencing imparted by mental processes . Aebli [1] andSchön [22; 23] have developed their own approaches tothe dialectic relationship between experiencing and actingand reflection and learning.Concepts, which are recalled and modified during theexperience-making process, can be visual images,although the production of experiences can also takeverbal forms: concepts are often linked to names andterms. Experiences are thus remembered in various forms,from sensory attributes of the objective reality tolinguistically coded work rules. In general the criterion of immediate usefulness for practical action influences theform of coding experiences. For example, experience onthe adequate functioning of a machine clutch involves therecall of a sensory impression rather than a verbaldescription. Experiences though are also recorded inverbal forms, especially when they are integrated intogeneral concepts. Metals are electrical conductors! is amixture of experience and book learning for themajority of the maintenance workers [10]. Such asentence is important for the practical activities of maintenance personnel, and it is coded as a sentence, andnot as a memory of a metal which had the property of anelectrical conductor. Nobody wishes or needs toexperience this property over and over again.The relation between experience and practicalaction/activity can be seen to have two dimensions. Firstlyexperiences are accumulated during practical doing,because the subject is interested in the conditions andprerequisites of his or her actions, in the actionsthemselves and finally in the consequences of the actions.The subject draws his or her attention to the actions, getsphysically-sensuously involved, mentally duplicates thesequence of actions and memorises it. Secondlyexperiences are sought after during practical doingbecause the subject ignores or just partially knows theprerequisites or the consequences of his or her acting andwants to learn them. This moment of experience isespecially emphasised in the surveys by Böhle et al. [4; 5].There is a temptation to regard the accumulation of experiences as a by-product of practical action, but thatthis is not so is evident from those cases where subjectshave accumulated little experience in spite of practicaldoing. Indeed the accumulating of experiencespresupposes that the subject wants to learn aboutsomething, wants to make it his or her concern and wantsto make practical use of it. Experience does notencompass a disaggregated mix of sensory perceptions.The content of experience is dependent on the context forone's own actions. At work experience is an importantelement of work process knowledge. It encompasses thecontents important for one's own actions in a form thatmakes it immediately useful for acting, and Hacker pointsto the opportunistic character of expert knowledge [12].  Experts try out different actions they deem appropriate forthe solution of a practical problem. For masters, thisexploration is deductive, as in a derivation fromsystematic knowledge, and inductive from exploring andinterpreting the situation. Such an intertwining of approaches can seem to an outsider to be jumping between different ways of problem solving. Empiricalinvestigations made evident that the relationship between know how and know that is in some way more dialogical [25] than Dreyfus and Dreyfus [8] haveassumed, when they proposed that experts utilise onlymemory of previous work tasks when carrying out a task.Expert knowledge was therefore seen as a matter of know-how which had become divorced from know-that andknow-why. Experts, however, may fail to remember howthey have carried out a specific work task as they try toestablish a connection between know how, know that andknow why.Experiences (maintenance workers call them'experience-values') can be passed on. Thus experiencehas, apart from individual and social qualities (based onthe social character of icons and terms), also a collectiveor group-specific quality. Experience-based knowledge of corporate maintenance procedures are preserved andpassed on [10]. Experience-values are often hard toexplain, even with their embedding into the practicalfeeling of the maintenance worker, as the development of experience-values are not necessarily dependent on theindividual performance of a single skilled worker, so thatthis worker would not necessarily be able to remember thespecific knowledge that created this experience value.Experience-values are at least partially collectiveknowledge within maintenance processes. They arepassed on with hints such as: do you see ..., do yourealise ... , do you feel ..., do you hear ... that ... .Thus assessment of the objective meaning of aphenomenon is not transmitted as a theory (though itmight contain theoretical insight), but is immediatelyabsorbed by the field of sensory perception of the personin action. These conditions form the basis forcommunication between skilled maintenance workers.There is a common stock of experience values relevant fortheir work. Most of the time the mere hint towards anexperience-value is sufficient - explanations are usuallyneither required nor could they be simply given. Muchresearch has recently been undertaken around the topic of  implicit knowledge [3; 17; 19; 20]. A concise overviewis given by Boreham [6], who supports the assumption of a dual cognitive architecture and examines how therelations between implicit and explicit processes of thinking are reflected in different (from unconsciously toconsciously controlled) thought patterns. This viewdefines experience as a comprehensive category whichcontains both explicit and implicit thinking. Development of an experience-baseddocumentation system for maintenanceworkers Increasing importance is being attached to skilledindustrial maintenance in computer-aided production, yetdespite increasing planning and preventive maintenance,fire-fighting assignments, involving elimination of acutemalfunctions, still represent a significant role for skilledmaintenance staff. This means working underconsiderable time pressure and frequently their worksituation is determined by machines and systems out of their range of normal functioning. The competence of maintenance workers in coping with such situations ischaracterised by experience-based action within a community of practice [15]. The diagnostic processitself is as far as possible experience-guided: skilledworkers search for certain sensory related values whichoften lead them - as they know from experience - to thecause of the malfunction very quickly and without mucheffort [10].Experience-based behaviour at work, however, ismade difficult under the conditions of computer-integrated production, due to the opaqueness of technicalphenomena and processes; the rapid rate of innovation inmachinery and software; the convergence of srcinallyseparate metal, electrical and information-relatedprocesses; and the networking of formerly separate areasof production. The major problem in this situation is thattechnical documentation for equipment and machines iseither not available or is inadequate. Work experience introubleshooting and elimination of faults is usually notdocumented at all.In developing work oriented solutions one has to keepin mind that every technical artifact necessarily containsan abstraction from work experience. A useful technicalsolution is complementary to rather than just a copy of human abilities (e.g. the use of wheels). Thereforealthough an abstraction from work experience has provedto be necessary within useful technical solutions it doesnot justify ignoring the experience of end users in systemsdesign.In order to support skilled workers' competences wesuggest the development of an experience-baseddocumentation system, as an alternative to theimplementation of expert systems, which are often notcomplementary to the user's competences [10; 11]. Thedesign of an experience-based documentation system for  maintenance work which leaves the decision-makingprocess to the user, includes the following objectives: ã   the main objective is to provide adequate structuresfor supporting decision making by the shop floorpersonnel. Such a structure can, in principle, beviewed as a shell, in which maintenance-relatedknowledge can be input and used by the usersthemselves; ã   The system contains a facility for inputting cause-and-effect interrelations to describe malfunctionswhich occur. Thus work experiences have to betranslated into a cause-and-effect-chain which give,in a certain (practical and not necessarily scientific)sense, an explanation for the malfunction. The onlyinformation that shall be documented shall be thatthat has been shown to be relevant for the diagnosisof malfunctions which have actually occurred. In thecourse of time these examples accumulate and can beused for troubleshooting.The system itself must be easy to use (for reasons of time pressure and as shop-floor workers are the mainusers). This means that the functions for the developmentand modification of documentation and diagnosisstructures are extensively automated in order to minimisethe operations necessary for operation of the system.Conclusions and decisions themselves, on the other hand,are not automatically made available since thecompetence of the users is based on their ability andresponsibility to make appropriate decisions. One reasonfor this is that, while coping with contradictions; a merehint (instead of an automatic conclusion) is often asufficient support.As shown in figure 1 a malfunction is presentedwithin DIADOSYS as a structure of chains which leadfrom the phenomenon ( tool exchanger stops ) to the finalreason for the fault (e.g. screws are loose ). This caseactually happened and the documentation of the case,which was undertaken by the maintenance workerhimself, can be read as follows: the tool-exchanger stopsbecause the tool magazine stops, the tool magazine stopsbecause the cog belt sprung over, the cog belt sprung overbecause the cog belt is loose, the cog belt is loose becausethe screws are loose. Another case that has happenedleads from the same phenomenon to the final reason toolittle oil . The explanation of these malfunctions lies inthe chain links between the phenomenon and the basicreason - nobody would understand the reason for themalfunction if only the final cause - screws are loose -had been quoted, but it is easy to understand if the chainlinks in-between are taken into consideration. As thosechains often extend over the space of one page on themonitor, a number of functions are offered (overview, go-to etc.) to navigate through the system very quickly.Relatively little information has to be entered, because of the nature of the experience of the users and their abilityto recognise and identify the difference between an actualsituation and the computer data and to draw conclusionsfrom the comparison.
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!