Data & Analytics

Packet Optical Transport: Migrating networks with next gen Packet Optical Network Platforms ECOC - Torino

Description
Packet Optical Transport: Migrating networks with next gen Packet Optical Network Platforms ECOC - Torino 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 1 Agenda Network Challenges History Network Trends Key features
Published
of 26
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Transcript
Packet Optical Transport: Migrating networks with next gen Packet Optical Network Platforms ECOC - Torino 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 1 Agenda Network Challenges History Network Trends Key features of POTP s Applications Migrating networks Fujitsu Network Communications 2 Network Challenges? Provide more Cost-effective Bandwidth Fueled by video and the web A shift to packet based services, making current network incapable or inefficient Residential/enterprise/wireless demands Dealing with declining revenue per bit Migrate the network, how? L2/L3 What about the Legacy traffic Who is doing the migration and the skills Concern for Just Capex, what about Opex Mixed TDM + Environment Sustained growth in TDM circuits & revenue Large growth in Moving to Packet networks, what is the right architecture to provide Scaling, QoS, & Protection Packet loss requirements for video Latency requirements for wireless backhaul Private-line equivalent for business Utilizing a scalable architecture How do you migrate to a Manageable, Scalable Network? Multi-media telepresence Packet Mobility 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 3 Single Technology Overlay Networks Carrier IP/MPLS Core SDH Core Switch SER LSR ATM Core LSR BS P LTE µp SDH P P P STM 16 / STM 64 P BS P LTE µp SDH P DWDM ROADM WDM WDM WDM Access Metro Aggregation Metro Core Networks have tended to grow in layers over the years 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 4 a brief History Optical Fibre Networks have traditionally used Add Drop Multiplexers (ADM s) to combine multiple streams of data into a single beam of light. This is the basis of fibre networks and was present from 1980 s ADM STM1/ s/early 2000 s saw a growth in Multi Service Provisioning Platforms (P s) which were a lower cost alternative to ADM s that could manage multiple fibre rings from a single chassis. They could also allow connections directly from LAN s to a service providers optical backbone! **These devices have served the carriers well in the early years of Packet transport P STM64 w/eos Recently, equipment has evolved into Packet ONP s which take the next step of providing huge transport capability (40 Gig/100G) and the ability to manage multiple telecoms inputs (DWDM, SONET/SDH, ) PONP w/coe, WDM, TDM 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 5 PONP s Why so Important? The jump from P Sounds like a natural evolution but actually a step change! PONP s P s only bolt on L1 services which do not provide aggregation PONP s optimised for all packet transport of L1 and L2, supports service aggregation With COE, more bandwidth efficiency = More Service Revenue and Higher Margins ALSO support all legacy transport, or any combination of packet and legacy, plus an eye to the future, eg, OTN. So, PONP s can solve a distributed aggregation and transport problem in the metro environment where traffic is moving very aggressively toward packets but still has a strong TDM (legacy) presence Eth P Eth P Eth P-ONP Eth P-ONP SDH Pipe Pipe P P-ONP wasted PE Router 20Mbps EVC PE Router 20Mbps EVC 10Mbps EVC 20Mbps EVC 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 6 PONP s Setting the Stage Some customers are galloping ahead to an all IP network and have large transport/optical requirements for high bandwidth or triple play PONP s with WDM and Connection Oriented for Router bypass and transport There are many others who need to move on but still derive a sizeable chunk of revenues from legacy. TDM is huge and is still forecasted so these customers need a solution that can cope with both PONP s with TDM and OTN support. Networks are evolving from ATM, Frame Relay, over SDH into 2 layers Carrier and ROADM/WDM Network is collapsing Important to integrate these 2 layers into a single device 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 7 Looking at Network Trends Increasing focus on convergence of packet/optics/tdm Drives efficiency and economics Lower cost transport models Packet traffic growth & network transformation Drives and WDM Clear trend toward higher speeds 40G, 100G Applicable in the Core and Metro networks 100G near term economics? OTN switching will be a clear requirement OTN will be used to support Legacy TDM ODU Flex and ODU1 ROADM evolution Higher degrees Core will use for add-drop, ring interconnect, and mesh connections, Metro predominately add-drop applications Colorless, directionless, contentionless SONET/SDH Declines as WDM Revenue Grows Source: Infonetics 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 8 Attributes of PONP s (1) High Integration of TDM fabric, Packet fabric and ROADM technology Typically 5 to10x equipment consolidation Automated SDH/SONET, wavelength and COE provisioning Photonic switching / ROADM as the foundation Next gen ROADM technology has 10x reduction in transit costs and 4x density evolution, with benefit of ROADM technology migrating from shelves/systems to pluggable cards Increased ROADM simplicity, fewer jumpers, improved automation with nodal tests, monitoring points and span measurements. Sub-lambda aggregation and grooming Integrated grooming eliminates subtended SDH and elements with on average 50% hub site cost savings Integrated non-blocking, cross-system grooming eliminates additional sub-tended NE setup and provisioning COE and TDM Aggregation networks Open-platform Implementation Example SDH Wave Transport TDM networks 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 9 Attributes of PONP s (2) Industry standard implementation of Connection Oriented with the ability to Scale Metro Early Switched access architectures are not sustainable as access costs rise dramatically with locations and were often overlaid on EoS networks Allows a general purpose infrastructure that supports Native (and EoS) services Distributed aggregation and transport with the PONP s reduces network costs 35-45%, provides a hard QoS and 50ms protection Optical Carrier Class Networking Simple software upgrades Hitless fabric switching Robust EMS and Optical planning tools COE and TDM Aggregation networks Open-platform Implementation Example SDH Wave Transport TDM networks 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 10 COE Ecosystem 6 Attributes of Connection-oriented Standardized Services MEF Service Definitions MEF Service Attributes Deterministic QoS Lowest Delay, Delay Variation, Loss Bandwidth Resource Reservation Connection Admission Control Scalability Layer 2 Aggregation Statistical Multiplexing Tag Swapping/Reuse COE Attributes OAM 802.3ah Link Fault Management Y.1731 Service Fault Management Performance Monitoring Reliability / Availability G ms EVC Protection 802.3ad UNI & ENNI Protection Security Bridging disabled-mac DoS attacks mitigated Completely Layer 2 - no IP vulnerabilities 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 11 COE Fundamental Attributes Carrier with Traffic Engineering 1. Frames take a predetermined path Guarantees Consistent EVC/OVC Performance Connection- Oriented EVC Connectionless EVC? Explicit data path Implicit data path 2. Bandwidth Reserved per EVC/OVC/Tunnel Also supports oversubscription Connection- Oriented EVC 1 EVC 2 EVC 3 Per-flow Bandwidth Deterministic performance EVC 1 EVC 2 EVC 3 Connectionless Aggregated Bandwidth? Statistical performance Copyright 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Definition of Connection-oriented (COE) Networking Flow can be an EVC, OVC, tunnel or a CoS instance of an EVC, OVC or tunnel EVC, OVC can have multiple CoS instances Tunnel can have multiple EVCs, OVCs Physical Port UNI EVC1 EVC2 Identified by VID Identified by PCP bits End to End EVC or OVC defined by service/application MEF EVC (UNI to UNI association) End user UNI to UNI at IP/MPLS network edge using COE COE between end users MEF OVC (UNI to ENNI association) End user UNI to ENNI at partner provider s network using COE Site-to-cloud EVC using COE MEF UNI IP/MPLS network MEF UNI Service Provider(s) PE CE Site-to-site EVC using COE network End User(s) CE Retail Partner network MEF ENNI Site-to-cloud OVC using COE MEF UNI 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 13 Multiservice Aggregation and Transport Switch Fabric Unit DSLAM SDH circuit s Packet connections PWE3 & IP/MPLS Core µp GE P Packet connections SDH circuits MSS/SER LSR LSR BS LTE µp SDH P BS SDH Aggregation ROADM Packet P TDM ROADM ROADM DWDM ROADM ROADM P LTE µp GE P ROADM ROADM P Access Metro Aggregation Metro Core 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 14 Key reasons for migrating to PONP s Price/performance achieving the lowest cost-per-bit transport; Service reach providing the widest geographical footprint for customers; Multi-service so that costs are shared across multiple lines of business; High availability with low failure rate, fast protection and optional restoration schemes; High QoS predictable latency, low errors and deterministic service delivery; Transparency to handle any end-user or carrier's service unaltered; Strong security to support any customer's data with confidence; SLAs delivering on a carrier's promise for performance and availability Fujitsu Network Communications Plus TCO is lower *src: Network Strategy Partners 15 Applications Consolidated core metro/regional networking Integration and collapsing of NGADM and ROADM networks More scalable support for infrastructure Triple play networks Integrated ROADM transport with packet aggregation enables bulk bandwidth delivery and eliminates costly elements Consolidated services networks EoS and EVPL service delivery ELAN tails Wireless backhaul networks Supports TDM and transport, aggregation and growth 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 16 Verizon Target Architecture Source: VZ, Elby, OFC Fujitsu Network Communications 17 Layer 1 Network Modernization Metro CO Metro Core Site DXC s, Switches, etc..ld handoff P DS3 Frame STM or WDM PONP w/ Mux on a blade and SWF support for COE and OTN switching Ready for Packet services 5x 10x reduction in space requirements 10x reduction in fiber / cabling Reduction in power, cooling costs Reductions in maintenance, spares costs Single craft interface Coupler Metro CO DS3 Frame P DS3 Frame P Metro CO P DXC s, Switches, etc..ld handoff PONP STM or WDM PONP P PONP 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 18 Video Transport Optimization VoD Servers Linear video Video Router ROADM ROADM ROADM ROADM GE BRAS VHO VHO 10GE Intermediate routers for VoD 10GE to 1GE multiplexing Video service protection VoD Servers Linear video Video Router 10GE PONP t ONP Intermediate Router PONP VSO ROADM GE Integrated aggregation and transport Uses PONP w/ WDM and COE Protection and multiplexing for all services ROADM for bandwidth scaling Removes intermediate routers Simpler operations PONP GE BRAS VSO PONP GE 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 19 Scaling the Network: Cross-Connect Manual Interconnection Complex. Costly. Unreliable. Existing Network VoIP L3 VPN Web Connection-oriented DCS Simplify, Reduce Cost, Increase Reliability VoIP L3 VPN Web PONP Existing Network 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 20 Interworking Domains and EoS EMS ADM 10/100 Edge STM4 Metro C.O. Aggregated Management P STM4/16 P 10/100 10/100 10/100 GigE 10/100/1000 E1/E3 CES TDM & EPL Edge P PDH PDH E Demarc CES E3 STM16 GigE NxE1 GigE Or 10GigE VLANs (over SDH, nxe1, E3, or Native ) LEC STMn STMn GigE PONP GigE or 10 GigE Native Handoffs VLANs GigE or 10 GigE GigE / 10GE Switch Services Network Switch Internet Migration of traffic from multi types of services in a large POP Legacy EoS traffic and native traffic into a core switched network MPLS network 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 21 Migration Using PONP with integrated ROADM/COE to bypass transit traffic 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 22 Mobile Backhaul Radio Controller Site 2G BTS ATM/IMA (UMTS) nxe1 Access GigE GigE SyncE PONP Core WDM GigE/10GE E1/STM1 STM1/ BSC RNC nxe1 FE 3G Node B LTE FE Access aggregates E1/ over a COE connections. Resiliant links available. CES for E1 EMS PWE functionality hands off E1/STM1/ to BSC/RNC PONP metro core with DWDM, COE and SyncE capabilities Mitigates separate use of traditional E1 timing sources COE provides SLA s needed by mobile carriers Facilitates mobile backhaul services Increased bandwidth requirements Reduces CAPEX for new deployments Desire to evolve network to all to reduce OPEX Support for lower cost Flat BTS architecture that combines all functions of the radio access network into a single IP node Eliminate need for GPS Core network provides headend aggregation, WDM and SyncE distribution SyncE Very similar to using SONET or SDH to provide a synchronization reference Advantages: Not affected by network traffic and Very good quality has been observed ( 2ns Wander) 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 23 Mobile Backhaul with COE Easier turn-up by Transmission engineers, eg, end to end provisioning does not require Layer 3 engineering expertise. Simpler management utilizing one management plane vs multiple Control Planes. Utilizing industry standards like Y.1731 and 802.1ag, Maintenance domains, with multiple Maintenance End Points can monitor points that you want to monitor. Facilitates Loopbacks, Trace and SDH-RDI functionality similar to traditional SDH networks. Guaranteed Latency for both working and protection paths. Defined protection path guarantees latency on both working and protect paths. Protection switching times guaranteed 50ms. No need to worry about fast reroute protocols and hits on traffic due to alternate reroute calculations. No Flooding of traffic based on switching protocols. Ext gen platforms can provide SyncE 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 24 Summary Carriers will be challenged to get more out of their networks as a transport will increase while SDH will become less important Migration of networks are important to preserve capex and lower opex PONP s offer highly integrated WDM/TDM/Packet capabilities Allows lower cost aggregation solutions based on COE and transport OTN switching Highly scalable WDM/ROADM functionality Multiple Opportunities exist to migrate networks using PONP platforms 2010 Fujitsu Network Communications 25 Thank You! Fujitsu Network Communications
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x