Creative Writing

Against Those Who Are Called Phrygians or Montanists (St. Epifanios of Cyprus)

Taken from the Panarion; Book II, Anacephalaeosis IV
of 12
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  Against those who are called Phrygians or Montanists 1  or, also, Tascodrugians St. Epifanios of Cyprus 1,1  Out of these in turn there emerges another sect, called the sect of the Phrygians. It srcinated at the same time as the Encratites, and is their successor. (2) For the Montanists had their beginning about the nineteenth year of Hadrian‘s successor Antoninus Pi us, 2  while Marcion, Tatian, and the Encratites who succeeded him had the irs in Hadrian‘s time and after Hadrian.   1,3  These Phrygians too, as we call them, accept every scripture of the Old and the New Testaments and likewise affirm the resurrection of the dead. But they boast of having one Montanus as a prophet, and Priscilla and Maximilla as prophetesses, and by paying heed to them have lost their wits. (4) They agree with the holy catholic church about the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit ,3  but have separated themselves by ―giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines o f devils‖ 4   and saying, ―We must receive the gifts of gra ce as well.‖   1.5   God‘s holy church also receives the gifts  of grace  —   but the real gifts, which have already been tried in God ‘s holy church through the Holy Spirit, and by prophets and apostles, and the Lord himself. (6) For the apostle John says in his Epistle, ―Try the spirits, whether they be of God;‖ 5   and again, ―Ye have heard that Antichrist cometh, and now many Antichrists have come. They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us: but that it might be made known that they were not of us. For this cause write I unto you, little children,‖ 6  and so on. (7) The Phrygians are truly not ―of ‖ the saints themselves. They ―went out‖ by their contentiousness, and ―gave heed‖ to spirits of error and fictitious stories. 2,1  For see here, by their thesis itself they are convicted of inability to keep their contentious promises. If we must receive gifts of grace, and if there must be gifts of grace in the church, why do they have no more prophets after Montanus, Priscilla and Maximilla? 7 Has grace stopped operating, then? Never fear, the grace in the holy church does not stop working! (2) But if the prophets prophesied up until a certain  point, and no more < after that* >, then neither Priscilla nor Maximilla prophesied; < they delivered their  prophecies after > the ones which were tried by the holy apostles, in the holy church. 2,3  Their stupidity will be refuted in two ways, then. Either they should show that there are prophets after Maximilla, so that their so-called ―grace‖ will not be inoperative. Or Maximi lla and her like will be  proved false prophets, since they dared to receive inspiration after the end of the prophetic gifts  —  not from the Holy Spi rit but from devils‘ imposture—  and delude her audience. 2,4  And see how they can be refuted from the very things they say! Their so-called prophetess, Maximilla, says, ―After me there will be no  prophet more, but the consummation.‖ (5 ) See here, the Holy Spirit and the spirits of error are perfectly recognizable! Everything the prophets have said, they also said rationally and with understanding; and the things they said have come true and are still coming true. (6) But Maximilla said that the consummation would come after her, and no consummation has come yet  —  even after so many emperors, and such a lapse of time! (7) There have been about 206 8  years from Maximil la‘s time until ours, the twelfth year of Valentinian and Valens and the < eighth > of Gratian, 9    and we have yet to see the consummation which was announced by this woman who boasted of being a  prophetess, but did not even know the day of her own death. 2,8  And it is plain to see that none who have estranged themselves from the truth have retained any soundness of reason. Like babes bitten by the perennial deceiver, the serpent, they have surrendered themselves to destruction and to being caught outside the fold and dragged off to be the wolf‘s meat < and > thus perish. This is because they did not hold on to the Head but deserted the truth and hazarded themselves in shipwreck, and in the surf of all sorts of error. (9) If Maximilla says there will never be another prophet, she is denying that they have the gift, and that it is still to be found among them. If their gift persists [only] until Maximilla, then, as I said before, she had no portion of the gifts either. 3,1  For she has gone astray. The Lord has set his seal on the church, and perfected the gifts of grace < in > her. When prophets were needed the same saints, filled with the Holy Spirit, delivered all the  prophecies for our benefit 11  —  [delivered them] in the true Spirit, with sound mind and rational intellect, in  proportion to their < faith > in the gifts of grace the Spirit was giving to each, and ―in proportion to the faith.‖ 12 (2) But what have these people said that was beneficial? What have they said that was in  proportion to the faith? Indeed, how can they be any but the persons of whom the Lord said, ―Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep‘s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves?‖ 13 3,3  By comparing what they have said with < the teachings > of the Old and New Testaments  —  which are true, and which have been delivered and prophesied in truth  —  let us determine which is < really >  prophecy, and which false prophecy. (4) A prophet always spoke with composure and understanding, and delivered his oracles by the Holy Spirit‘s inspiration. 14  He said everything with a sound mind like ―Moses, the servant of God and faithful in all his house, who saw the glory of God < apparently, and not in dark speeches.‖ 15  And thus the man who saw* > was called a prophet in the Old Testament. (5) Scripture says, ― The vision which Isaiah the son of Amoz, the prophet, saw: 16  I saw < the > Lord sitting upon a throne high and lifted up. And I saw Seraphim and Cherubim, and I heard the Lord saying unto me, Go and tell this people, Hear indeed and ye shall not understand; and see indeed, and ye shall not  perceive.‖ 17  And after hearing this from the Lord he went to the people and said, ―Thus saith the Lord.‖ (6) Can‘t you see that this is the speech of a sober person who is not out of his senses, and that the words were not delivered as the speech of a mind distraught? 3,7  Similarly, when the prophet Ez ekiel heard the Lord say, ―Ba ke thee bread on human dung,‖ 18  he said, ―Not so, Lord; nothing common or unclean hath at any time come into my mouth.‖ 19  (8) Understanding that which had been threateningly said to him by the Lord, he did not go ahead and do [it] as though he were out of his senses. Since his mind was sound and rational he prayed and said, ―Not so, Lord.‖ These  —   both the teaching and the discussion  —  are marks of < the > true prophets, whose minds are sound in the Holy Spirit. 3,9  And who can deny that Daniel was filled with all wisdom and in possession of his senses? He found the answers to  Nebuchadnezzar‘s riddles, (10) recalled Nebuchadnezza r‘s dreams when they had eluded even the dreamer, and with his soundness of mind and the superiority of his gift, gave the explanation at once. For he had wisdom greater than everyone‘s by the gift of the Holy Spirit, who truly gives wisdom—  to the prophet and to those who, through the prophet, are vouchsafed the teaching of the truth.  3,11  But when the Phrygians profess to prophesy, it is plain that they are not sound of mind and rational. Their words are ambiguous and odd, with nothing right about them. (4,1) Montanus, for instance, says, ―Lo, the man is as a lyre, and I fly over him as a pick. The man sleepeth, while I watch. Lo, it is the Lord that distracteth the hearts o f men, and that giveth the heart to man.‖ 20   4,2  Now what rational person who re ceives the ―profitable‖ message with understanding and cares for his salvation, can fail to despise a false religion like this, and the speech of someone who boasts of being a  prophet but cannot talk like a prophet? (3) For the Holy Spirit never spoke in him. Such expressions as ―I fly,‖ and ―strike,‖ and ―watch,‖ and ―The Lord distracteth men‘s hearts,‖ are the utteranc es of an ecstatic. They are not the words of a rational man, but of someone of a different stamp from the Holy Spirit who spoke in the prophets. 4,4  When the Phrygians are undertaking to combine falsehood with truth and rob of their intelligence  persons who care for accuracy, they pile up 21  texts to make a false case for their imposture, and < to prove their lies from them* >, say that certain scriptures bear a resemblance to it. < For instance >, the Holy S cripture has said, ―G od sent an ‗ecstasy‘ upon Adam, and he slept.‖ 22   But Adam‘s case was nothing like theirs . (5) In their case God did not mean to fashion a body  —  his reason for putting Adam into a trance  —  and, of his extreme loving-kindness, give them a similar experience. (6) God brought the unconsciousness of sleep upon Adam, not distraction of mind. There are many different forms of ecstasy. We call stupefaction from excess of wonder an ecstasy; and madness is called ecstasy because it is out of touch with reality. (7) But Ad am‘s ―ecstasy‖ of sleep was so called in a different sense, one related to the activity of his body, especially because the holy Adam whom God‘s hand had fashioned was cast into a very deep  trance. 5,1  For it is indeed plain that the sacred scripture was right to call this ecstasy. When someone is asleep, all his senses leave him and take a rest. Though the sense of sight is there, for example, it does not see; the eye is closed, and the mover in the man, the spirit or soul, is at rest. (2) If there is an unpleasant odor in the house or even a pleasant one, the sense of smell is there but does not perceive the odor; this sense has gone off to take a rest. (3) If there are bitter, or salty or sweet fluids in the mouth, the sense of taste does not perceive them; it lies in the ecstasy of rest without doing what it did in the man when he was awake. 5,4  The ear is there, but the hearing is not functioning as a sense. And if people are talking in the house it often does not hear what anyone says unless the man wakes up; for the time being, its function is suspended. (5) Creatures can be crawling on our bodies, but we do not feel their touch on our bodies unless their onslaught is severe; the whole body has abandoned its activity for the rest of sleep. 5,6  For the body is made of earth and envelops the soul, and since God made it serviceable to us in this way, it is allowed a time of withdrawal from its full sensation to a state of rest. The soul itself does not abandon its function of governance or thought. (7) It often imagines and sees itself as though it were awake, and walks around, does work, crosses the sea, addresses crowds  —  and sees itself in more situations, and more striking ones, in its dreams. 23  (8) But it is not like a madman, or an ecstatic in a transport. He takes frightful things in hand while awake in body and soul, and often does grievous harm  to himself and his neighbors. He does not know what he is saying and doing, for he has fallen into the ecstasy of folly. 6,1   Beloved, Ι have needed to gather all this material < about > the various kinds of ecstasy because of the text, ―The Lord sent an ecstasy upon Adam, and he slept.‖ 24   (2) And Ι ha ve explained why going to sleep is called an ―ecstasy from the Lord‖ in tha t passage. It is because of the compassion and lovingkindess God has granted to all, so that one may be removed from care and the business of living to the rest of sleep. (3) In Adam‘s case, however, God further called  it ecstasy because it made him insensitive to pain for a time, because of the side God meant to take from him and make into his wife. 6,4   But Adam‘s senses and wits were  not in abeyance. He recognized Eve as soon as he awoke, and said, ―This is now bone of my bo ne and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‗wife,‘ for she was taken out of her husband.‖ 25 (5) And as you see, he was aware of the past and the present, and made a prophecy of the future. L ook here, by saying ―bone of my bone‖ he took notice of what had happe ned while he was asleep. And he was aware of the present; after his wife had been made he was aware that she had been taken from < his > body. (6) And of the future he prophesied, ―For this cause shall a man leave his father and his mother and shall cleave unto his wife, and they two shall be one fl esh.‖ 26  These are not the words of a man in an ecstasy or without understanding, but of a person of sound mind. 7,1   But if I also have to speak of ―I said in my   ecstasy, all men are liars,‖ 27  the meaning of this, again, is different. These are not the words of a madman and an ecstatic < as the Phrygians claim* >  —  far from it!  —  (2) but of someone who is very surprised, and is taking more notice than usual < of > things that are < not > fit to be said and done. For since the prophet was astonished, he also speaks with astonishment here. 7,3  The prophets fell into trances, < but* > not into distraction. Peter too was in an ―ecstasy,‖ 28  not  because he was irrational but because he saw things other than what men usually see in the everyday world. (4) ―For he saw a sheet let down, bound at the four corners, and in it all manner of four-footed  beasts and creeping things and birds of the air.‖ 29  (5) Observe that St. Peter was rational, and not out of his mind. For when he heard < the words >, ―Arise, kill and eat,‖ 30  he did not obey like a person of unsound mind, but told the Lord, ―Not so, Lord; nothing common  or unclean hath at any time come into my mouth.‖ 31   7,6   And the holy David said, ―< I said >, all men are liars.‖ 32  In saying, ―I said,‖ he was speaking for himself, and saying that people lie. Thus he was not lying  —   but he expressed great astonishment because he was amazed and astounded at God‘s loving  kindness and the things the Lord had told him. (7) And, seeing that everyone is in n eed of God‘s mercy, he as cribed truth-telling to the Lord alone, and realized that every human being is deserving of punishment  —  thus evidencing the true Spirit, who spoke in the  prophets and revealed to them the depths of the exact knowledge of God. 7,8  Abraham too fell into ecstasy  —  not the abeyance of his wits but the distraction of fear. He saw the furnace and the torches about sundown < and was afraid, as* > other prophets said when they saw visions in their right minds. (9) Moses, for example, said, ―I fear exceedingly and quake.‖ 33  But Abraham knew what the Lord was saying , for < scripture says >, ―Thou shalt know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger 400 years in a land that is not theirs.‖ 34  (10) And you see how plain it is that everything was said in truth by the prophets with sound mind and sober reason, and not in madness.

Mythical creatures

Jul 23, 2017


Jul 23, 2017
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks