M Bastian (2006) Haraway’s Lost Cyborg and the Possibilities of Transversalis !igns: a Journal of Women in Culture and Society #(#)$ %02&'%0 () *B This is the +a,,e-ted version’ of this arti,le$ -lease see the offi,ial version for ,itation inforation) Haraway’s Lost Cyborg and the Possibilities of Transversalis .onna Haraway’s entire body of wor/ is -ereated by her interest in finding ways of allowing heterogeneo0s a,tors to wor/ -rod0,tively together) This interest weaves its way thro0
of 28
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  M Bastian (2006) Haraway’s Lost Cyborg and the Possibilities of Transversalis ! igns: a Journal of Women in Culture and Society   #(#)$ %02&'%0   *B This is the +a,,e-ted version’ of this arti,le$ -lease see the offi,ial version for ,itation inforation Haraway’s Lost Cyborg and the Possibilities of Transversalis .onna Haraway’s entire body of wor/ is -ereated by her interest in finding ways of allowing heterogeneos a,tors to wor/ -rod,tively together This interest weaves its way throgh the ,yborg$ the Modest1itness$ and now the ,o-anion s-e,ies ithin all these figres lies the desire to develo- 3vlnerable$ on'the'grond wor/ that ,obbles together non'haronios agen,ies and ways of living that are a,,ontable both to their dis-arate inherited histories and to their barely -ossible bt absoltely ne,essary 4oint ftres5 (Haraway 200#$ &) !trangely enogh$ while Haraway’s ,oents on te,hnology have been widely e-lored$ this i-ortant wor/ on ,oalition bilding has  been largely overloo/ed 7,,ordingly$ this arti,le atte-ts to a- ot the ,ontors of a ,yborg theory of ,oalition 8 eaine Haraway’s sggestion that we st relin9ish or sense of bonded identity in order to wor/ with threatening and frightening others However$ 8 also sggest that while  be,oing ,yborgian has a--ealing -ossibilities$ it is e9ally i-ortant to nderstand the  -ain and fear that inevitably ,oin,ides with the atte-t to ,riti,ally evalate one’s own sb4e,t -osition .is,ssions of the diffi,lties of a,tally rewor/ing or ,on,e-tions of sb4e,tivity is liited in Haraway’s own wor/$ so as a res-onse to this -roble 8 see/ to  bring Haraway’s theories into ,onversation with the theoreti,al as-e,ts of transversal  -oliti,s$ as they are e-ressed by Cynthia Co,/brn and *ira :val'.avis This theory of bilding ,oalitions for -ea,e otlines soe of the -ra,ti,al isses involved in learning how to -erfor the identity wor/ ne,essary for intera,ting o-enly with others Transversalis is a -arti,larly a-t ,onversation -artner for Haraway sin,e it is a sitated %   -ra,ti,e that see/s to reain s-e,ifi, to the needs of the -arti,lar woen involved$ while also offering tools and ideas that ,an ins-ire others in their ,oalition wor/ 7s s,h it adds valable a--arats to Haraway’s -ro4e,t of nderstanding 3how worldly a,tors ight soehow be a,,ontable to and love ea,h other less violently5 (200#$ &) 7n additional benefit of this ,onversation is that transversalis also sggests a -ossible ,ontet fro whi,h we ight develo- a greater nderstanding of the ,yborg as an a,tor within a ,onity$ ,ontradi,ting ,ertain tenden,ies to see it as -riarily an individal figre ;rther$ sin,e both Haraway’s wor/ and transversal -oliti,s start fro the -reise that ,onfli,t is i-ossible to eliinate$ the ,onity i-lied by the ,on4n,tion  between the ,hallenges ,oon ,on,e-tions of ,onity as the -la,e of harony and ,onion 8nstead$ so,ial str,tres and sb4e,tivities are develo-ed that allow s to view disagreeent as a -rod,tive o--ortnity rather than soething we need to abolish 8n order to gain a ,learer idea of how disagreeent ight be viewed in a ore  -ositive light$ 8 trn to the wor/ of Linnell !e,ob and <ean'L, *an,y who$ while ,oing fro 9ite a different theoreti,al ba,/grond to both Haraway and transversalis$ nevertheless have i-ortant insights to offer to the ,onversation 8 ,on,lde by e-hasi=ing that while ade9ate theories and te,hni9es are needed for the  -ossibility of ore -rod,tive ,oni,ation$ what is also i-ortant is a -ersonal desire for ,hange that is able to withstand the diffi,lties of being ,onstantly ,hallenged withot growing defensive or self'-rote,tive Figurations  .onna Haraway’s ost faos wor/ is$ of ,orse$ her essay entitled 37 Cyborg Manifesto5 (Haraway %%b$ %  > %?%) 7t the tie of its develo-ent Haraway was ,on,erned that feinis was si-ly re4e,ting s,ien,e as as,linist and therefore forfeiting the o--ortnity to define the featres of the new integrated ,ir,it of twentieth',entry te,hnos,ien,e 8n addition$ ainstrea feinis was ,riti,i=ed by woen of ,olor$ who arged that the all'en,o-assing ,ategory of 3woan5 elided the lived realities of any woen Haraway’s notion of the ,yborg was therefore ,on,eived as a way of re,ogni=ing both of these ,riti9es of hegeoni, feinis Conse9ently$ 2  Haraway’s ,yborg -resented a way of intiately ,onne,ting feinis with te,hnos,ien,e$ and a way of envisioning -oliti,al ,oalition that did not rest on an e,lsivist notion of woan This ,ontribtion to a new way of nderstanding -oliti,al ,oalition was 4st one aong the any others Haraway has -rod,ed$ all of whi,h ,onfor to Haraway’s te,hni9e of figration This te,hni9e$ ins-ired by the wor/ of woen of ,olor$ -arti,larly @! third'world feinists$ sets ot a -oliti,s that 3rests on the ,onstr,tion of the ,ons,iosness$ the iaginative a--rehension$ of o--ression$ and so of -ossibility5 (Haraway %%a$ % ) Haraway ths atte-ts to develo- iaginative nderstandings of ,on,e-ts s,h as sb4e,tivity$ /nowledge$ and relationality that ,hallenge the traditional estern  -hiloso-hi,al view of the self and its relation to the other in order to -resent the  -ossibilities that ,oe fro seeing how we do not fit into this self'other dyad ;or ea-le$ rather than nderstanding the sb4e,t as a self',reating individal$ Haraway  -resents the sb4e,t as one who eerges throgh 3,o',onstittive relationshi-s in whi,h none of the -artners -re'eist the relating$ and the relating is never done on,e and for all5 (200#$ %2) Ths$ in des,ribing a new iaginative a--rehension or figration$ Haraway does not atte-t to develo- self'figrations whi,h wold only a--ly to individal sb4e,ts bt instead develo-s a /inshi-'networ/ that brings to light ,onne,tions that have  been rendered invisible by ,onventional estern di,hotoies (see Haraway 200#$  ' %%) @nderstanding one’s ,onne,tions to others in this way hel-s one to rewor/ these di,hotoies and ths to -ro-ose a view of ,olle,tive a,tion that dis,orages the se of divisive ,ategories as a basis for hoogeneos nity within gro-s 7n i-ortant area that Haraway wished to address in her essay 37 Cyborg Manifesto5 was the way in whi,h hegeoni, feinis had failed to wor/ in an o-en and -lral anner with nonwhite woen !he sggested that rewor/ing one’s sense of self was a ne,essary ste- towards ore in,lsive -oliti,al str,tres Her figration of the ,yborg was ths develo-ed in  -art to -rovide a ,on,e-tion of feinist ,oalitions that did not re9ire a hoogeni=ing sisterhood in order to fn,tionHowever$ the ,yborg is not Haraway’s only figration$ as The Companion Species #   Manifesto  ,onfirs 8nstead$ it eists within a ,olle,tion of other -oliti,al figres that ,onfor to Haraway’s -oliti,al te,hni9e of develo-ing visions of nsre$ heterogeneos$ desiring$ noninno,ent$ lea/y$ sitated a,tors These visions are not abstra,t theories bt 3-erforative iages that ,an be inhabited5 (%&$ %%)$ or as Aosi Braidotti -ts it$ 3a  -oliti,ally infored a,,ont of an alternative sb4e,tivity5 (% $ %) These figres are sefl be,ase they -rovide fo,s$ a -oint of referen,e That is$ 3a figre ,olle,ts - the  -eo-le a figre ebodies shared eanings in stories that inhabit their adien,es5 (Haraway %&$ 2#) ith these new ,onfigrations Haraway does not see/ to ,reate  -eranent identity or ,losre bt to allow ,onfli,ting ,on,e-ts to intera,t in order to see what ight be -rod,ed Ths figrations are iagined in order to hold together 3,ontradi,tions that do not resolve into larger wholes5 be,ase ea,h idea$ althogh ,onfli,ting$ ight be 3ne,essary and tre5 (Haraway %%b$ % ) ;igrations do not tell s what to do rather$ they -rovide a fraewor/ within whi,h everyday de,isions ight  be ade differently They sggest a different way of orienting oneself within one’s environent by offering -ossibilities of nderstanding and a,ting that are not ne,essarily able to be seen within another frae of referen,e;igrations are able to -erfor this wor/ by revealing the nderlying ass-tions of s-e,ifi, dis,orses and showing the ways in whi,h these dis,orses fail or ,ontradi,t theselves Ths$ develo-ing a figration involves loo/ing for those a-orias or i-assable ga-s in /nowledge that 3-rovo/e a s-a,e of -ossibility -re,isely be,ase things don’t wor/ soothly anyore5 (Haraway 2000$ %%) 8nto these ga-s Haraway inserts tri,/ster figres The ost a-t will thrive on the glit,hes that inevitably o,,r in any /nowledge syste and will denatrali=e the ,oonsense feel of its ideology ;igration entails loo/ing for a way to ,ase the seioti, e,hani,s of a ,ertain ideology not to sto-$ bt to reasseble and wor/ differently 7n i-ortant as-e,t of this te,hni9e is the eleent of en4oyent ;or Haraway$ rethin/ing dis,rsive bondaries is both serios -lay and -layflly serios !eeing theoreti,al wor/ in this way gards against the -ossibility of be,oing too atta,hed to one’s ideas$ too arrogant$ or of ta/ing oneself too seriosly 8ndeed$ while reading
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks