Documents

BOLMAN_AND_DEAL Test Bank by Barbara McKeon

Description
Bolman
Categories
Published
of 84
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  REFRAMING ORGANIZATIONS TEST BANK  Chapter 1True/False 1.The structural frame sees organizations as factories.2.The primary sources of managerial “cluelessness” are personality disorders and IQ.3.Frames are also called maps, mental models, cognitie lenses, schema, and mind sets.!.The e plosie technological and social changes of recent years hae simplified our lies and our understandings of the #orld.$.The most effectie managers choose a single perspectie or frame, and %ecome highly&s'illedspecialists. (.)ccording to *olman and +eal, “multiframe thin'ing” typically leads to confusion and  paralysis..-odern organizations rely too much on an artistic approach to management and too little on an engineering approach..*olman and +eal argue that most managers and leaders hae trou%le understanding comple situations, not %ecause they lac' the intelligence, %ut %ecause they are una%le to adopt multiple perspecties.  Answers 1.T /0. 1$& hile the structural frame sees organizations as factories and machines the humanresource frame sees organizations as a family, the political frame sees organizations as  4ungles, and the sym%olic frame sees organizations as carnials, temples and theater.2.F /0p. & 5 hile it is true that some managerial “cluelessness” comes from psychological fla#s, personality disorders, and IQ managerial “cluelessness” is primarily caused %y clinging to entrenched mental models. This action does not allo# the manager to ma'e sense of situations or it encourages the misinterpretation of those situations that do not conform to these entrenched #ays of thin'ing.3.T /0. 16 5 )ll of the images %rought to mind %y these different la%els help to illustrate the notion of the use of frames.!.F /0. ( 5 These e plosie technological and social changes hae produced a #orld that is far more interconnected, frantic and complicated. e find ourseles “in oer our heads” /7egan, 188. Forms of management and organization #hich #ere effectie a fe# yearsago are no# o%solete.$.F / 0. 1$(.F /0. 1.F /0p. 26&1.T Multiple Choie  REFRAMING ORGANIZATIONS TEST BANK  1.If, as a manager, you encounter an important pro%lem that seems almost impossi%le to sole *olman and +eal #ould li'ely suggest that you9a.:ire a consultant #ho %rings the right 'no#ledge and e pertise to the pro%lem %.;tand out of the #ay and let someone else #or' on the issuec.Try using different lenses to analyze the pro%lem and deelop strategiesd.<all a meeting of eeryone #ho 'no#s a%out the issue and ma'e a group decision a%out #hat to do2.It is argued that een the smartest managers ta'e foolish actions in decision&ma'ing %ecause they9a.)re too cleer for their o#n good %.:ae a parochial and distorted ie# of the pro%lem at handc.)re drien %y self&loe and ego, #hich stifle their a%ility to understand a situation correctlyd.Fall into the trap of personality foi%les such as pride, haughtiness and unconscious need to err 3.The political frame sees organizations asa.<arnials %.Factoriesc.Familiesd.=ungles!.The most successful mangers rely on #hich of the four  frames  to diagnose their situation>a.;tructural %.:uman ?esourcec.0oliticald.;ym%olice.)ll of the a%oe$.hich is not one of the four characteristics of the intuitie “%lin'” process>a.<onscious %.@ery fastc.:olisticd.?esults in “affectie 4udgments” (.*olman and +eal descri%e the actions of the successful manager as similar to a s'illed carpenter using the right tools for the 4o%. Thus, a successful manager must9a.-a'e sure their organizations are “leel” /i.e., %alanced %.0ossess “a dierse collection of high&Auality implements /i.e., frames” along #ith the 'no#ledge of #hen and ho# to use them c.“-easure t#ice %ut cut once” /i.e., not ma'e hasty decisionsd.:ae the right #ood /i.e., employees for the 4o% .*olman and +eal %elieea.)ll of the social science research in organizational studies can %e meaningfully  REFRAMING ORGANIZATIONS TEST BANK  categorized into four frames  %.That the field of management research is Auic'ly moing to#ards a unified approach to understanding organizationsc.The ma4or schools of thought a%out organizations in the social sciences possess similar assumptions %ut differ in their understandings of organizationsd.)cademic research has not contri%uted much to improe management practice.-ultiframe thin'inga.)llo#s managers to discern #hich of the four frames in their model is most effectie in understanding a particular situation they are facing %.<onfuses mangers %y presenting too many #ays to interpret a particular situation they are facing.c.)llo#s a manager to o%tain a more meaningful understanding of the situation they are facing that any one frame alone #ould not proided.<larifies the ran' order of the accurateness of the multiple frames Answers 1.c /0. 1 5 Bach frame has its o#n image of reality. )pplying and understanding the four frames deepens your understanding of organization. This approach #ill allo# you to deelop a solution %y #ay of a clearer understanding of the nature of the pro%lem. ;ince you directly e perience the pro%lem in a #ay a consultant cannot, an internal solution may %e arried at more easily, #ithout the added e pense of the consultants time. 2.% /0p. & & -anagers get trapped in entrenched mental models that do not allo# them to ma'e sense of or misinterpret situations that do not conform to these entrenched #ays of thin'ing. This leads to foolish actions and decision ma'ing.3.d /0. 1( & hile the political frame see organizations as 4ungles, the structural frame sees organizations as factories and machines, the human resource frame sees organizations as a family, and the sym%olic frame sees organizations as carnials, temples and theater !.e /0. 18 5 ;uccessful managers do not rely on any one particular frame, rather employ multiple frames to ma'es sense of situations they encounter.$.a /0. 11 5 “<onscious” is not one of the four characteristics of the intuitie “%lin'” process  %ecause the “%lin'” process is engaged #ithout conscious a#areness.(.% /0p. 13&1! 5 Ci'e maps, frames are %oth #indo#s on a territory and tools for naigation. Bery tool has distinct strengths and limitations. The right tool ma'es a 4o% easier. *ut the #rong one gets in the #ay. .a. /0. 1! & The authors %eliee that the social science researchers hae deeloped multiple  perspecties through #hich to research and understand organizations. Bach perspectie holding a uniAue set of assumptions. Bach of these perspecties proides a different frame through #hich to e amine organizations. They hae sorted these perspecties into four underlying frames..c /0p. 1&18 5 Bach of the four frames proides a different image of organizations and a different understanding of a particular situation a manager faces. Thus, using the four frames creates a more meaningful understanding of organizations than any one frame #ould alone. Coneptual/Open!en e #uestions  REFRAMING ORGANIZATIONS TEST BANK  1.Dltimately, #hat do *olman E +eal see at the primary the reason *o% ardelli failed as <BG of :ome +epot>2.hat is a frame and #hat does it allo# a manger to accomplish>3.hat is “reframing” and #hy is it an important s'ill for managers>!.+escri%e the cognitie process called anchoring> Answers 1.*o% ardelli failed as <BG for :ome +epot %ecause he #as only a%le to see part of the  picture of #hat he #as facing. ;uccessful leaders hae the a%ility to see the #hole picture from multiple frames. In the case study, the <BG of :ome +epot, *o% ardelli, had an incomplete picture of the operation that negatiely impacted :ome +epotHs results. :e  possessed that incomplete or distorted picture %ecause he oerloo'ed or misinterpreted important signals. Implementing a command and control structure, he focused only on operational efficiency at :ome +epot and he neglected the aspects of customer care that made :ome +epot successful. Through his actions, he fundamentally changed :ome +epotHsculture, #hich led to a decline in employee morale and customer serice. This course of action seerely damaged his relationship #ith inestors and the %oard of directors of :ome +epot. /0p. 3&!2.It is a set of ideas and assumptions that help a manager understand and negotiate a particular “territory.” It permits a manger to register and assem%le 'ey %its of perceptual data into a coherent picture of #hat is happening. It allo#s a manger to 'no# #hat she is up against andultimately, #hat she can do a%out it. /0. 113.?eframing is the a%ility to %rea' frames 5 the a%ility to moe from utilizing one frame to utilizing another frame to ma'e sense of the situation a manager faces. :aing the a%ility to employ multiple frames allo#s a manger to create a more meaningful understanding of the multitude of different situations she faces. ?eframing encourages a manager to use more than one frame to ma'e sense of the situation. Bery frame has strengths and limitations, andthus, each frame is more or less alua%le for ma'ing sense of a particular situation. /0p. 12&13!.)nchoring is a cognitie process that occurs #hen a decision ma'er loc's into a particular ans#er to a pro%lem or understanding of a situation in spite of the fact that some of the facts of the situation do not fit decision ma'erHs ans#er or understanding of the situation. /0. 12 Mathin$ 1.-atch each frame #ith its corresponding metaphor9 FRAMEMETA%&OR  ;ym%olicFamily0olitical<arnial;tructural=ungle:uman ?esourceFactory
Search
Tags
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks