Municipality of Pillila upto RIzal.doc

of 5
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  Municipality of Pililla, Rizal v. Court of Appeals Re LEGAL COUNSEL OF LGU FACTS ã  The RTC of Tanay, Rizal rendered judgment ordering the hili!!ine etroleum Cor!oration C# to !ay the $uni%i!ality of ililla muni%i!ality# &u'ine'' ta(e' and other fee') The judgment *a' a+rmed &y the SC and &e%ame nal and e(e%utor) The %a'e *a' remanded tothe RTC for e(e%ution) ã -n %onne%tion *ith the e(e%ution of judgment, Atty) Feli( $endiola led a motion in &ehalf of the muni%i!ality for the e(amination of C.' gro'' 'ale' for the !ur!o'e of %om!uting it'&u'ine'' ta(e') C led a manife'tation &efore the RTC to the e/e%t that $ayor atenia of ililla re%ei0ed from it 11)2$ a' full 'ati'fa%tion of the judgment a' e0iden%ed &y the relea'eand 3uit %laim do%ument' e(e%uted &y the 'aid mayor) The RTC i''ued an order denying Atty)$endiola.' motion for e(amination and e(e%ution of judgment) ã Atty) $endiola led a motion for re%on'ideration %laiming that the total lia&ility amounted to45)4$ *hile the amount re%ei0ed &y the mayor *a' only 14)6$) 7e a''erted that themayor %annot *ai0e the &alan%e of the judgment o0er *hi%h hi' la* rm had regi'tered t*olien' for alleged %on'ultan%y 'er0i%e' and attorney.' fee' amounting to more than 14$) TheRTC, ho*e0er, denied hi' $R) ã A !etition for %ertiorari *a' led &y Atty) $endiola *hi%h *a' referred to the CA fora!!ro!riate a%tion) ã PPC led a motion questionin t!e aut!ority of Atty. Mendiola to represent t!emunicipality. T!e CA dismissed t!e petition for !avin een led y a privatecounsel in violation of t!e la# and $urisprudence ut #it!out pre$udice to t!e linof a similar petition y t!e municipality t!ru t!e proper provincial or municipalleal o%cer.  Atty) $endiola led a !etition &efore the SC to a''ail the de%i'ion of the CA) &SS'( 8 9ON Atty) $endiola, a !ri0ate %oun'el, ha' authority %an le an a%tion in %ourt for and in&ehalf of the muni%i!ality of ililla )(*+ 8 NO) Atty) $endiola ha' no authority to le an a%tion in %ourt in &ehalf and in the name of the $uni%i!ality of ililla) 1.Private attorneys cannot represent a province or municipality in lawsuits. Se%) 1:;< of the Re0i'ed Admini'trati0e Code !ro0ide' that the !ro0in%ial '%al 'hallre!re'ent the !ro0in%e or any muni%i!ality or muni%i!al di'tri%t thereof in any %ourt e(%e!t a# in %a'e' *hereof srcinal juri'di%tion i' 0e'ted in the SC or &# in %a'e' *here the muni%i!ality or muni%i!al di'tri%t i' a !arty ad0er'e to the !ro0in%ialgo0ernment or to 'ome muni%i!ality or muni%i!al di'tri%t in the 'ame !ro0in%e) 9hen the!ro0in%ial '%al i' di'3ualied, a '!e%ial attorney may &e em!loyed &y the muni%i!al%oun%il) 7en%e, only t!e provincial scal or municipal attorney can represent a provinceor municipality in t!eir la#suits ) The !ro0i'ion i' mandatory) T!e municipalitysaut!ority to employ a private la#yer is limited only to situations #!ere t!eprovincial scal is disqualied to represent it ) For thi' e(%e!tion to a!!ly, t!e factt!at t!e provincial scal #as disqualied must appear on record ) 2.The fscal’s reusal to represent the municipality is not a legal justifcation or employing theservices o private counsel. Unli=e a !ra%ti%ing la*yer *ho ha' a right to refu'e em!loyment, scal cannot refuse toperform !is functions on rounds not provided for y la# #it!out violatin !isoat! of o%ce )  -n'tead of engaging the 'er0i%e' of a '!e%ial attorney, t!e municipal council s!ouldrequest t!e Secretary of -ustice to appoint an actin provincial scal  in !la%e of the !ro0in%ial '%al *ho ha' de%lined to handle and !ro'e%ute it' %a'e in %ourt) 3.The legality o a private counsel’s representation can be questione at any stage o the proceeings. RAMS v CA /00123FACTS ã etitioner' Antonio C) Ramo', Ro'alinda $) erez, Norma C) Ca'tillo, and the >aliuag $ar=et?endor' A''o%iation, -n%) led a !etition &efore the %ourt a quo  for the @e%laration of Nullity of $uni%i!al Ordinan%e No) 1 16:#, $uni%i!al Ordinan%e No) 6 1B# and a Contra%t of lea'eo0er a %ommer%ial ar%ade to &e %on'tru%ted in the muni%i!ality of >aliuag, >ula%an ã  The !ro0in%ial Fi'%al and the ro0in%ial Attorney Oli0iano @) Regalado# led an An'*er in&ehalf of re'!ondent muni%i!ality) ã At the !retrial %onferen%e, Atty. Ro erto 4. Romanillos   a !ri0ate %oun'el# a!!eared,manife'ting that he *a' %olla&orating %oun'el for re'!ondent muni%i!ality) ã etitioner' 3ue'tioned the !er'onality of Atty) Romanillo' to a!!ear a' %oun'el of re'!ondentmuni%i!ality, and mo0ed to di'3ualify Atty) Romanillo' from a!!earing a' %oun'el and de%larenull and 0oid the !ro%eeding' !arti%i!ated in and underta=en &y Atty) Romanillo' ã $ean*hile, Atty) Romanillo' and Atty) Regalado led a joint motion 'tating, among other',that Atty) Romanillo' *a' *ithdra*ing a' %oun'el for re'!ondent muni%i!ality Atty. Realado is adoptin t!e entire proceedins participatedin5underta6en y Atty. Romanillos ã RTC Dudge denied !etitioner' motion and on the other hand, granted Atty) Regalado' motionto formally ado!t the entire !ro%eeding'  -n 'u!!ort of the de%i'ion, re'!ondent Dudge rea'oned8  etitioner'. motion for the di'3uali%ation of Atty) Romanillo' a' re'!ondentmuni%i!ality' %oun'el i' deemed moot and a%ademi% in 0ie* of hi' *ithdra*al a'%oun'el of 'aid muni%i!ality)  @e'!ite Atty Romanillo'.' a%ti0e !arti%i!ation in the !ro%eeding', the o!!o'ing%oun'el ha' ne0er 3ue'tioned hi' a!!earan%e until after he made a formal o/er of e0iden%e for the re'!ondent') The a%3uie'%en%e of !etitioner' %oun'el of hi'a!!earan%e i' tantamount to a *ai0er and !etitioner' are, therefore, e'to!!ed to3ue'tion the 'ame) ã Assumin t!at t!e proceedins !ad een 7tainted #it! frailness to render t!e sameleally o $ectiona le,7 t!e same as een 7leally remedied7 y its formal adoptionupon motion of t!e Provincial Attorney. ã CA di'mi''ed the !etition and denied the motion for re%on'ideration)-SSUES1)9ho authorized to re!re'enta muni%i!ality in it' la*'uit'H4)$ay the !ro%eeding' &e 0alidated &y a !ro0in%ial attorney' ado!tion of the a%tion' made&y a !ri0ate %oun'elH7EL@81)Only PR8&9C&A* F&SCA* and t!e M'9&C&PA* ATTR9(:    !ro0in%ial '%al' fun%tion'a' legal o+%er and ad0i'er for the %i0il %a'e' of a !ro0in%e and %orollarily, of themuni%i!alitie' thereof, *ere 'u&'e3uently tran'ferred to the provincial attorney #Se%) 1:;< of the Re0i'ed Admini'trati0e Code, %om!lemented &y Se%) < of the Lo%al AutonomyLa*, only provincial scal  and the municipal attorney  %an re!re'ent a !ro0in%e ormuni%i!ality in their la*'uit') The !ro0i'ion i' mandatory) The muni%i!ality' authority to em!loy  a !ri0ate la*yer i' e(!re''ly limited only to 'ituation' *here the !ro0in%ial '%al i' di'3ualied tore!re'ent it) ã Only in e(%e!tional in'tan%e' may a !ri0ate attorney &e hired &y a muni%i!ality to re!re'ent itin la*'uit') The'e e(%e!tion' are enumerated in the %a'e of  !linsug vs ) T# $r  )  %&' (an#arlos #ity' )egros *cciental 81)*hen the muni%i!ality i' an adverse party  in a %a'e in0ol0ing the !ro0in%ialgo0ernment or another muni%i!ality or %ity *ithin the !ro0in%e4)if and *hen original juri'di%tion of %a'e in0ol0ing the muni%i!ality i' 0e'ted in the Supreme Court <)in a %a'e in0ol0ing the muni%i!ality, he, or hi' *ife, or %hild, i' !e%uniarily in0ol0ed,a' heir legatee, %reditor or other*i'e ã  Thi' 'tri%t %oheren%e to the letter of the la* a!!ear' to ha0e &een di%tated &y the fa%t that +the municipality shoul not be burene with e,penses o hiring a private lawyer+  and thatthe intere't' of the muni%i!ality *ould &e &e't !rote%ted if a go0ernment la*yer handle' it'litigation')4)  :(S, can e adopted !ence iven 8A*&+&T:  ã -t doe' not a!!ear that the ado!tion of !ro%eeding' !arti%i!ated in or underta=en &y Atty)Romanillo' *ould ha0e re'ulted in any 'u&'tantial !rejudi%e to !etitioner' intere't) ã Re3uiring ne* trial on the mere legal te%hni%ality that the muni%i!ality *a' not re!re'ented&y a legally authorized %oun'el *ould not 'er0e the intere't of ju'ti%e) ã  The Court did not 'ee any inju'ti%e %ommitted again't !etitioner' &y the ado!tion' of the*or= of !ri0ate %oun'el nor any intere't of ju'ti%e &eing 'er0ed &y re3uiring retrial of the %a'e&y the duly authorized legal re!re'entati0e of the to*n) ã -n 'um, although a muni%i!ality may not hire a !ri0ate la*yer to re!re'ent it in litigation', inthe interest of substantial justice  ho*e0er, *e hold that a muni%i!ality may ado!t the*or= already !erformed in good faith &y 'u%h !ri0ate la*yer8 1# !ro0ided that no inju'ti%e i' there&y hea!ed on the ad0er'e !arty and 4# !ro0ided further that no %om!en'ation in any gui'e i' !aid therefore &y 'aidmuni%i!ality to the !ri0ate la*yer    ;ARC&A vs CM(*(C /011<3 Re -nitiati0e and ReferendumFACTS8-n it' am&ayang Ia!a'yahan >lg) 1B, Serye 1<, 1 the Sangguniang >ayan ng $orong, >ataanagreed to the in%lu'ion of the municipality of Moron as part of t!e Su ic Special(conomic =one  in a%%ord *ith Re!u&li% A%t No) 6446)On $ay 45, 1<, !etitioner' led a !etition 4 *ith the Sangguniang >ayan of $orong to annulam&ayang Ia!a'yahan >lg) 1B, Serye 1<)etition 'tate' among other', to nullify the I1B, to 'e!arate Grande -'land from SSEJ and returnit to >ataan, to re0i0e in >ataan the ?irgin Fore't', to allo* >ataan to %reate it' o*n SEJ' The muni%i!ality of $orong did not ta=e any a%tion on the !etition *ithin thirty <B# day' after it''u&mi''ion) etitioner' then re'orted to their !o*er of initiati0e under the Lo%al Go0ernmentCode of 11) They 'tarted to 'oli%it the re3uired num&er of 'ignature' <   to %au'e the re!eal of 'aid re'olution)Un=no*n to the !etitioner', ho*e0er, the 7onora&le Edil&erto $) de Leon, ?i%e $ayor andre'iding O+%er of the Sangguniang >ayan ng $orong, *rote a letter to the E(e%uti0e @ire%tor of CO$ELEC re3ue'ting the denial of  ) ) ) the !etition for a lo%al initiati0e andKor referendum&e%au'e the e(er%i'e *ill ju't !romote di0i'i0ene'', %ounter !rodu%ti0e and futility) ?i%e $ayorallege that /03 &y 0irtue of R)A) 6446, other*i'e =no*n a' the >a'e' Con0er'ion @e0elo!mentA%t of 14, all a%tion' of LGU' %orrelating on the a&o0e i''ue' are merely re%ommendatory in  nature *hen 'u%h !ro0i'ion' *ere already em&odied in the 'tatute) $oreo0er, it allege' />3  thatthe S> f $orong ha' !a''ed a re3ue't to the Congre'' to amend %ertain !ro0i'ion' of RA 6446*hi%h ta%=led the 'ame i''ue' rai'ed & !etitioner') And /?3  the Sangguniang >ayan of $oronghad a%%ommodated the %lamor of the !etitioner' in a%%ordan%e *ith it' limited !o*er' o0er thei''ue') 7o*e0er, the Sangguniang >ayan of $orong %annot a/ord to *ait for amendment' &yCongre'' of R)A) 6446 that *ill !erha!' drag for 'e0eral month' or year', there&y delaying thede0elo!ment of $orong, >ataan)the CO$ELEC en &an% re'ol0ed to deny the !etition for lo%al initiati0e on the ground that it''u&je%t i' merely a re'olution !am&ayang =a!a'yahan# and not an ordinan%e)No* !etitioner' allege that re'!ondent CO$ELEC e(er%i'ed GA@81)A' an admini'trati0e agen%y, re'!ondent Comele% i' &ound to o&'er0e due !ro%e''in the %ondu%t of it' !ro%eeding') 7ere, the 'u&je%t re'olution', Anne(e' E and7, *ere i''ued e( !arte and *ithout a/ording !etitioner' and the other!ro!onent' of the initiati0e the o!!ortunity to &e heard thereon) $ore im!ortantly,the'e re'olution' andKor dire%ti0e' *ere i''ued *ith gra0e a&u'e of di'%retion) ASangguniang >ayan re'olution &eing an a%t of the aforementioned lo%al legi'lati0ea''em&ly i' undou&tedly a !ro!er 'u&je%t of initiati0e)4)Re'!ondent Comele%' authority in the matter of lo%al initiati0e i' merelymini'terial) -t i' duty&ound to 'u!er0i'e the gathering of 'ignature' in 'u!!ort of the !etition and to 'et the date of the initiati0e on%e the re3uired num&er of 'ignature' are o&tained)-f the re3uired num&er of 'ignature' i' o&tained, the Comele% 'hall then 'et a datefor the initiati0e during *hi%h the !ro!o'ition 'hall &e 'u&mitted to the regi'tered0oter' in the lo%al go0ernment unit %on%erned for their a!!ro0al &SS'(@ *hether am&ayang Ia!a'yahan >lg) 1B, 'erye 1< of the Sangguniang >ayan of $orong, >ataan i' the !ro!er 'u&je%t of an initiati0e )(*+@ :(S Father >erna'8 in re!u&li%an 'y'tem', there are generally t*o =ind' of legi'lati0e !o*er, srcinaland deri0ati0e) Original legi'lati0e !o*er i' !o''e''ed &y the 'o0ereign !eo!le) @eri0ati0elegi'lati0e !o*er i' that *hi%h ha' &een delegated &y the 'o0ereign !eo!le to legi'lati0e &odie'and i' 'u&ordinate to the srcinal !o*er of the !eo!le) The Con'titution %learly in%lude' not only ordinan%e' &ut re'olution' a' a!!ro!riate'u&je%t' of a lo%al initiati0e) Se%tion <4 of Arti%le ?- !ro0ide' in luminou' language8 TheCongre'' 'hall, a' early a' !o''i&le, !ro0ide for a 'y'tem of initiati0e and referendum, andthe e(%e!tion' therefrom, *here&y the !eo!le %an dire%tly !ro!o'e and ena%t la*' ora!!ro0e or reje%t A9: act or la#  or !art thereof !a''ed &y the Congre'', or lo%allegi'lati0e &ody ) ) )-n Se% 1: of RA :66<8 Limitation' U!on Lo%al Legi'lati0e >odie'  Any !ro!o'ition on ordinance or resolution  a!!ro0ed through the 'y'tem of initiati0e and referendum a'herein !ro0ided 'hall not &e re!ealed, modied or amended, &y the lo%al legi'lati0e &ody%on%erned *ithin 'i( :# month' from the date therefrom ) ) ) )-n Se% 145 of LGC8 Se%) 145) Limitation' on Lo%al -nitiati0e') a# The !o*er of lo%alinitiati0e 'hall not &e e(er%i'ed more than on%e a year) &# -nitiative shall e,ten only to subjects or matters which are within the legal powers o the (anggunians to enact.  Thi' !ro0i'ion %learly doe' not limit the a!!li%ation of lo%al initiati0e' to ordinan%e', &ut toall 'u&je%t' or matter' *hi%h are *ithin the legal !o*er' of the Sanggunian' to ena%t,*hi%h undou&tedly in%lude' re'olution') Thi' inter!retation i' 'u!!orted &y Se%tion 142 of 
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks