Essays

Organic Soybean Population Study

Description
Organic Study Jerry Vigue, Andrew Clayton, Tim Howe, and Joel Gruver This study was initiated to evaluate the impact of density on soybean grain yield, seed quality and weed suppression. Four target s
Categories
Published
of 5
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
Organic Study Jerry Vigue, Andrew Clayton, Tim Howe, and Joel Gruver This study was initiated to evaluate the impact of density on soybean grain yield, seed quality and weed suppression. Four target s (75,000, 150,000, 175,000 and 225,000 /acre) were replicated 3 times. The highest and s were outside the range of s commonly used in both conventional and organic production systems. Seed quality was an important aspect of this study because of the stricter quality standards required for food grade soybean markets. Methods: The experimental plots (4 rows x 960 ft) were planted in field 2B to a food grade soybean variety (Iowa 3001) on 6/27/98 using a Buffalo 4 row planter with 30 row spacing. The experimental site was located at the Allison Organic Research and Demonstration farm (Roseville, IL) and followed a three year crop rotation (corn-soybean-small grain/red clover). Mechanical weed control consisted of multiple shallow tillage passes prior to planting, 2 rotary hoeings and 3 row cultivations. Assessment of weed suppression consisted of counting the number of foxtail heads and broadleaves that emerged above the soybean canopy. Foxtail and broadleaves were sampled on 9/23/98 from 2 representative 1 row sections in each plot (80 total feet for foxtail and 360 total feet for broadleaves). The final stand count was performed on 10/8/98. Nine representative rows 5 feet in length were counted for each treatment to arrive at the average. The field was harvested on 11/17/98 with a Gleaner combine. Plot yields were determined using a weigh wagon and converted to yields per acre at 13% moisture. A representative sample of soybean from each plot (20 g of seed isolated by 3 splits from 160 g) was visually separated into 6 quality categories and weights were determined for each category. Gross and net income (per acre) were both calculated using 1998 yield data and February 2008 grain and seed prices (Table 3). Results: yield increased with increase (Graph1 and Table 1). The 2 highest soybean treatments had a yield difference among each other of 1.7 bu/a, which was not statistically significantly different. However, both of these s had yields that were significantly higher than the 2 other lower s (Table 1). weeds did decrease in numbers as soybean increased, but not significantly even though the highest soybean had less than half as many weeds as the soybean. Foxtail (predominately Giant) weeds also reduced in numbers as soybean plants increased. Significant differences of foxtail weeds among treatments were observed (Table 1). The 2 higher s produced significantly more excellent quality/unblemished than the soybean (Table 2). Seed size did not vary significantly with (data not presented). Based on current seed and grain prices, the highest final achieved in this study (166,900 plants/acre) was most profitable (Table 3). (Bu/ac) Graph 1. s in Various s , , , ,900 s Table 1. Effect of on Grain and Weed Counts % increase Foxtail weeds/ac % Foxtail reduction weeds/ac % reduction 75,000/ac 71,600/ac 16.5 N/A 131,018 N/A 1,293 N/A 150,000/ac 114,600/ac % 45,998 65% 1,019 21% 175,000/ac 143,300/ac % 29,648 77% % 225,000/ac 166,900/ac % 16,931 87% % , Table 2. Effect of on Seed Quality soybean Unblemished/ Excellent appearance with brown with purple with green with damage with splits 75,000/ac 71,600/ac ,000/ac 114,600/ac ,000/ac 143,300/ac ,000/ac 166,900/ac Table 3. Effect of on Production System Economics Gross income per acre at $30/bu* Seed cost per acre at $38.50 per bag** Seed cost per acre at $38.50 per bag** Net income increase per acre over *** 75,000/ac 71,600/ac 16.5 $495 $20.63 $19.69 N/A 150,000/ac 114,600/ac 20.0 $600 $41.25 $31.52 $89 175,000/ac 143,300/ac 23.0 $690 $48.13 $39.41 $ ,000/ac 166,900/ac 24.8 $744 $61.88 $45.90 $215 * Based on online report USDA Livestock, Poultry, and Grain Market News Feb, ** Based on the average full retail price of two food grade seed beans from Great Harvest Organics and Blue River Hybrids in Each bag contains 140,000. *** This assumes there are no other differences in production or post harvest expenses. Seed expense figured into the net income was based on the average of intended and final. Summary of the Subsequent Year s Experiment: A similar soybean study was also performed in 1999 with higher yields, but less favorable results. This study was also planted to Iowa 3001 soybeans, but on 36 ridge-till rows and in field 1B. This experiment was planted 5/25/99, which was about one month earlier than the previous year s experiment. Its methods of weed control included ridge-till planting, rotary hoeing 3x and row cultivating 3x. Weed s were scored in the 1999 experiment instead of actual counts to save on time and due to no significant differences (table 4). quality was also evaluated, but there were no significant differences for any of the categories. Table 4 illustrates two of those for examples. This 1999 experiment did show some significant yield differences among different s. It also revealed a similar trend to the previous year with increasing yields as the increased, with one exception. The highest did drop in yield, but not significantly (table 4). It is important to note that a significant amount of rain (5.1 ) occurred between June 1 st and June 13 th. This led to shallow water standing in some parts of the field that may have impacted some of the reps yields. This may even be the reason for the highest to break the pattern and drop in yield. The amount of weeds in the 1999 experiment was fewer than in the 1998 experiment, even though it was planted a month earlier during a time when weed competition can be intense. This is most likely credited to planting under ridge-till management instead of using conventional tillage. Our experience with planting organic soybeans early (prior to the 2 nd week in June) using conventional tillage is that the weeds are still very competitive with the crop. However, we have had good success with soybeans competing against weeds that were planted early under ridge-till management, such as the 1999 experiment. While this experiment was not repeated exactly like the one in the previous year, it still revealed a pattern of increased yield with increased soybean. Table 4. Effect of on Grain, Weed Counts, and Seed Quality in 1999 Study % increase Foxtail Score** Score** Unblemished/ Excellent appearance with damage 70,000/ac 61,600/ac 33.8 N/A ,000/ac 97,800/ac % ,000/ac 127,500/ac % ,000/ac 161,300/ac % ** = Visual score of weed s in an area of approximately 12 x20 using the following: 0 = none or insignificant, 1 = light, 2 = moderate, 3 = heavy Discussion and Conclusions: Our results suggest that there are multiple advantages to planting high s of soybeans in organic production systems. In contrast, recent studies (e.g.,whigham (1998) and Nafziger (2003) indicate that conventional producers can increase profitability by planting at lower seeding rates than previously recommended. Apparent differences in optimal soybean s for organic and conventional production systems relate to differences in seed cost and role of competition in weed suppression. Weed suppression in organic soybean production relies heavily on rapid canopy closure while conventional soybean production relies heavily on herbicides to eliminate weeds. The cost of higher s appears to be justified in organic production systems (table 3), at least up to the highest in this study, due to accompanying benefits such as higher yields, better weed control, and higher quality beans. It is unclear why the higher soybean s resulted in higher seed quality in It could be because the soybean plants in the higher treatments had less competition from weeds, which may have resulted in less stress, insect pressure, and/or disease than treatments with more weeds. These studies or similar ones will need to be repeated to draw stronger conclusions. We intended the final s to be higher than was achieved. We are satisfied that our was low enough, but believe that the highest actual in this type of study should be above 200,000/ac. Less tillage, higher top-end s and an optimum planting date will be targeted if this type of study is pursued in the future. Literature cited: Whigham K What is the best soybean seeding rate? Integrated Crop Management. Iowa State University Extension. Nafziger E Getting soybean planting right. Agronomy Day Field Tour Presentation. University of Illinois.
Search
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks