Proposed Redefinition of SI Base Units

Proposed Redefinition of SI Base Units (article from Wikipedia)
of 12
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  Proposed redefinition of SI base units For a topical guide to this subject, see Outline of the metric system. K A scd kgmmol Current (2013) SI System: Dependence of  base unit  definitions  on other base units (for example, the  metre  is defined in terms of the distance traveled by light  in a specific fraction of a  second  )Proposed SI System: Dependence of base unit definitions on physical constants  with fixed numerical values and on other baseunits that are derived from the same set of constants. A committee of the International Committee for Weightsand Measures (CIPM) has proposed revised formal def-initions of the SI base units, which are being examinedby the CIPM and which may be considered by the 25th'General Conference on Weights and Measures’, in 2014.Themetricsystemwasoriginallyconceivedasasystemofmeasurement that was derivable from nature. When themetricsystemwasfirstintroducedinFrancein1799tech-nicalproblemsnecessitatedtheuseofartifactsasthepro-totype metre and kilogram. In 1960 the metre was rede- fined in terms of the wavelength of light from a specified source, making it derivable from nature, but the kilogramhas been defined by an artifact ever since its introduction.If the proposed redefinition is accepted, the metric sys-tem (SI) will, for the first time, be wholly derivable fromnature.The proposal can be summarised as follows:“There will still be the sameseven base units (second, metre, kilogram, ampere, kelvin, mole, and candela). Of these, the kilo-gram, ampere, kelvin and molewill be redefined by choosing exactnumerical values for the Planckconstant, the elementary electriccharge, the Boltzmann constant, and the Avogadro constant, re-spectively. The second, metreand candela are already defined byphysical constants and it is onlynecessary to edit their presentdefinitions. The new definitionswill improve the SI without chang-ing the size of any units, thusensuring continuity with presentmeasurements.” [1] Further details are found in the draft chapter of the  NinthSI Units Brochure . [2] The last major overhaul of the metric system was in 1960when the International System of Units (SI) was formallypublished as a coherent set of units of measure. SI isstructured around seven base units that have apparently“arbitrary” definitions and another twenty units that arederived from these base units. Although the units them-selves form a coherent system, the definitions do not. Theproposal before the CIPM seeks to remedy this by usingthefundamentalquantitiesofnatureasthebasisforderiv-ing the base units. This will mean, amongst other things,that the prototype kilogram will cease to be used as  the 1  2  1 BACKGROUND  definitive replica of the kilogram. The second and themetre are already defined in such a manner.A number of authors have published criticisms of the re-vised definitions — in particular that proposal had failedto address the impact of breaking the link between themole, kilogram, the dalton, the Avogadro constant and Avogadro’s number. 1 Background Main article: History of the metric systemThe basic structure of SI was developed over a periodof about 170 years (1791 to 1960). Since 1960 techno-logical advances have made it possible to address variousweaknesses in SI, notably the dependence on an artifactto define the kilogram. 1.1 Development of SI DuringtheearlyyearsoftheFrenchRevolution, thelead-ers of the French National Constituent Assembly decidedto introduce a completely new system of measurementbased on the principles of logic and natural phenom- ena. The resulting  mètre des archives   and  kilogramme des archives   were defined in terms of artefacts that were a“best attempt” at fulfilling these principles. [3] In 1875, by which time the use of the metric systemhad become widespread in Europe and in Latin Amer-ica, twenty industrially developed nations met for theConvention of the Metre. The result was the signing ofthe Treaty of the Metre under which three bodies wereset up to take custody of the international prototype kilo-gramandmetreandtoregulatecomparisonswithnationalprototypes. [4][5] They were: ã  CGPM (General Conference on Weights and Mea-sures /  Conférence générale des poids et mesures  )—The Conference meets every four to six years andconsists of delegates of the nations who had signedthe convention. It discusses and examines the ar-rangements required to ensure the propagation andimprovement of the International System of Unitsand it endorses the results of new fundamentalmetrological determinations. ã  CIPM (International Committee for Weights andMeasures /  Comité international des poids et mesures  )—The Committee consists of eighteen em-inent scientists, each from a different country, nom-inated by the CGPM. The CIPM meets annuallyand is tasked to advise the CGPM. The CIPM hasset up a number of sub-committees, each chargedwith a particular area of interest. One of these, theCCU (Consultative Committee for Units), amongstother things, advises the CIPM on matters concern-ing units of measurement. [6] ã  BIPM (International Bureau for Weights and Mea-sures /  Bureau international des poids et mesures  )—The Bureau provides safe keeping of the interna-tional prototype kilogram and metre, provides labo-ratory facilities for regular comparisons of the na-tional prototypes with the international prototypeand is the secretariat for the CIPM and the CGPM.The first CGPM (1889) formally approved the use of40 prototype metres and 40 prototype kilograms fromthe British firm Johnson Matthey as the standards man-dated by the Convention of the Metre. [7] One of eachof these was nominated by lot as the international proto-types, other copies were retained by the CGPM as work-ing copies and the rest were distributed to member na-tionsforuseastheirnationalprototypes. Atregularinter-vals the national prototypes were compared with and re-calibrated against the international prototype. [8] In 1921the Convention of the Metre was revised and the man-date of the CGPM was extended to provide standardsfor all units of measure, not just mass and length. Inthe ensuing years the CGPM took on responsibility forprovidingstandardsofelectriccurrent(1946), luminosity (1946), temperature (1948), time (1956) and molar mass (1971). [9] MassdriftovertimeofnationalprototypesK21–K40, plustwoof the International Prototype Kilogram’s  (IPK’s) sister copies : K32 and K8(41). [Note 1] All mass changes are relative to the IPK. [10] The 9th CGPM (1948) instructed the CIPM “to makerecommendations for a single practical system of units ofmeasurement, suitable for adoption by all countries ad-hering to the Metre Convention”. [11] The recommenda-tions based on this mandate were presented to the 11thCGPM (1960) where they were formally accepted andgiven the name Système International d'Unités  and itsabbreviation “SI”. [12] 1.2 Impetus for change Changing the underlying principles behind the defini-tion of the SI base units is not without precedent. The  313th CGPM (1967) replaced the srcinal definition ofthe second (which was based on a back-calculation of theEarth’s rotation in the year 1900) with a definition basedon the frequency of the radiation emitted between twohyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133atom. Similarly, the 17th CGPM (1983) replaced the1960 definition of the metre [Note 2] with one where themetre is derived from the speed of light where the speedof light had been defined exactly in terms of metres persecond. [13] Over the years, drifts of up to 2×10 −8 kilograms perannum in the national prototype kilograms relative tothe international prototype kilogram have been detected.There was no way of determining whether the nationalprototypesweregainingmassorwhethertheIPKwaslos-ing mass. [14] At the 21st meeting of the CGPM (1999),national laboratories were urged to investigate ways ofbreaking the link between the kilogram and a specificartefact. Newcastle University metrologist Peter Cump-son has since identified mercury vapour absorption orcarbonaceous contamination as possible causes of thisdrift. [15][16] Independently of this drift having been identified, theAvogadro project and development of the Watt balancepromised methods of indirectly measuring mass witha very high precision. These projects provided toolsthat would enable alternative means of redefining thekilogram. [17] A report published in 2007 by the Consultative Commit-teeforThermometrytotheCIPMnotedthattheircurrentdefinition of temperature has proved to be unsatisfactoryfor temperatures below 20 kelvins and for temperaturesabove 1300 kelvins. The committee was of the view thatthe Boltzmann constant provided a better basis for tem-perature measurement than did the triple point of water,as it overcame these difficulties. [18] At its 23rd meeting (2007), the GCPM mandated theCIPM to investigate the use of natural constants as thebasis for all units of measure rather than the artefacts thatwere then in use. The following year this was endorsedby the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics(IUPAP). [19] At a meeting of the CCU held in Reading,UnitedKingdom, inSeptember2010, aresolution [20] anddraftchangestotheSIbrochurethatweretobepresentedto the next meeting of the CIPM in October 2010 wereagreed to in principle. [21] The CIPM meeting of Octo-ber 2010 found that “the conditions set by the GeneralConference at its 23rd meeting have not yet been fullymet. [Note 3] For this reason the CIPM does not proposea revision of the SI at the present time ; [23] however, theCIPMpresentedaresolutionforconsiderationatthe24thCGPM (17–21 October 2011) to agree the new defini-tions in principle, but not to implement them until thedetails have been finalised. [24] This resolution was ac-cepted by the conference, [25] and in addition the CGPMmoved the date of the 25th meeting forward from 2015to 2014. [26][27] 2 The proposal In this section, an “X” at the end of a number means one or more final digits yet to be agreed upon .In 2011 the CCU published a draft of the proposedchange in the form of an amendment that should be madetothe8theditionofthe SIBrochure . [2] Inittheyproposedthat in addition to the speed of light, four further con-stants of nature should be defined to have exact values: ã  The Planck constant  h  is exactly6.62606X×10 −34 joule second (J·s). ã  The elementary charge  e  is exactly1.60217X× 10 −19 coulomb (C). ã  The Boltzmann constant  k   is exactly1.38065X×10 −23 jouleperkelvin(J·K −1 ). ã  The Avogadro constant  N  A  is exactly6.02214X×10 23 reciprocal mole (mol −1 ).Theseconstantsweredescribedinthe2006versionoftheSI manual; the latter three were defined as “constants tobe obtained by experiment”.The CCU also proposed that the numerical values asso-ciated with the following constants of nature be retainedunchanged: ã  The speed of light  c  is exactly299792458metres per second (m·s −1 ). ã  The ground state hyperfine splittingfrequency of the caesium − 133 atom Δ ν  ( 133 Cs)  is exactly 9192631770hertz (Hz). ã  The luminous efficacy  K    ofmonochromatic radiation of frequency540×10 12 Hz is exactly 683 lumen perwatt (lm·W −1 ).The seven definitions above are rewritten below af-ter converting the derived units (joule, coulomb, hertz, lumen and watt) into the seven base units (second, metre, kilogram, ampere, kelvin, mole and candela). In the listthat follows, the symbol sr stands for the dimensionlessunit steradian. ã  Δ ν ( 133 Cs) = 9192631770s −1 ã  c   = 299792458s −1 ·m ã  h  = 6.62606X×10 −34 s −1 ·m 2 ·kg ã  e  = 1.60217X×10 −19 s·A  4  3 IMPACT ON BASE UNIT DEFINITIONS  ã  k   = 1.38065X×10 −23 s −2 ·m 2 ·kg·K −1 ã  N  A = 6.02214X×10 23 mol −1 ã  K   = 683 s 3 ·m −2 ·kg −1 ·cd·srIn addition the CCU proposed that ã  the international prototype kilogram beretired and that the current definition ofthe kilogram be abrogated, ã  the current definition of the ampere beabrogated, ã  the current definition of the kelvin be ab-rogated and ã  the current definition of the mole be re-vised.These changes will have the effect of redefining the SIbase units, though the definitions of the derived SI unitswill remain the same. 3 Impact on base unit definitions TheCCUproposalrecommendedthatthetextofthedef-initions of all the base units be either refined or rewrit-ten changing the emphasis from explicit-unit to explicit-constant type definitions. [28] Explicit-unit type definitionsdefine a unit in terms of a specific example of that unit—for example in 1324 Edward II defined the inch as be- ing the length of three barleycorns [29] and since 1889the kilogram has been defined as being the mass of theInternational Prototype Kilogram. In explicit-constantdefinitions, a constant of nature is given a specified valueand the definition of the unit emerges as a consequence.Forexample, in1983, thespeedoflightwasdefinedtobeexactly 299,792,458 metres per second and as long as thesecond has already been defined, the length of the metrecan be defined.The current (2008) [13] and proposed (2011) [21] defini-tions are given below. In many cases the final digit of anyconstant is yet to be agreed, so it has been represented byan X  3.1 Second The proposed definition of the second is effectively thesame as the current definition, the only difference be-ing thattheconditionsunderwhichthemeasurementsaremade are more rigorously defined. Current definition:  The second is the du-ration of 9192631770 periods of the radia-tion corresponding to the transition betweenthe two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom. Proposed definition:  The second, s, is theunit of time; its magnitude is set by fixing thenumerical value of the ground state hyperfinesplitting frequency of the caesium-133 atom,at rest and at a temperature of 0 K, to be equalto exactly 9192631770 when it is expressed inthe unit s −1 , which is equal to Hz. 3.2 Metre The proposed definition of the metre is effectively thesame as the current definition, the only difference beingthat the additional rigour in the definition of the secondwill propagate to the metre. Currentdefinition:  Themetreisthelengthofthe path travelled by light in vacuum during atime interval of 1/299792458 of a second. Proposed definition:  The metre, m, is theunit of length; its magnitude is set by fixing thenumerical value of the speed of light in vac-uum to be equal to exactly 299792458 when itis expressed in the unit m·s −1 . 3.3 Kilogram Thewattbalancewhichwillmeasuretheratioofthe Planckcon- stant  to the international prototype kilogram. [30] The definition of the kilogram is undergoing a fundamen-tal change - the current definition defines the kilogram asbeing the mass of the international prototype kilogramwhich is an artifact, not a constant of nature [31] whilethe new definition relates it to the equivalent energy ofa photon via the Planck constant. Current definition:  The kilogram is the unitof mass; it is equal to the mass of the interna-tional prototype of the kilogram.
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks