Slides Shared Resource

1. Individual Differences Approach Personality 2. Individual Differences Approach <ul><li>Examines how people are similar and how they differ in their…
of 17
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  • 1. Individual Differences Approach Personality
  • 2. Individual Differences Approach <ul><li>Examines how people are similar and how they differ in their thinking, feeling and behaviour. </li></ul><ul><li>For example, people can be classified according to intelligence and personality characteristics. </li></ul><ul><li>People are complex = multiple theories and evidence as to what are prevailing aspects of psychological differences. </li></ul>
  • 3. Two different approaches <ul><li>Idiographic – approach based on individuals. Emphasises uniqueness. Can be understood through use of techniques, e.g. case studies, which are designed to reflect uniqueness. </li></ul><ul><li>Nomothetic – based on the idea of laws of behaviour which are applied to everyone & can be used to compare people with each other. Uses statistical techniques to accumulate large amounts of data. </li></ul>
  • 4. Individual Differences Approach <ul><li>Uses the nomothetic approach to studying Personality. </li></ul><ul><li>Types, Traits, and Factors: Three Ways of Describing Personality </li></ul>
  • 5. Personality <ul><li>From the Latin ‘persona’ meaning an actor’s mask. </li></ul><ul><li>What is personality ? : </li></ul><ul><li>characteristic pattern of behaviours, attitudes, interests, capabilities, </li></ul><ul><li>pattern is integrated, </li></ul><ul><li>unique ( a means of differentiating between individuals), </li></ul><ul><li>it is relatively stable (though there is some disagreement about this), </li></ul><ul><li>forms a basis for predicting future behaviour. </li></ul>
  • 6. The study of personality <ul><li>systematic account of the ways that people differ,and a logical framework for predictions. </li></ul><ul><li>need it to make sense of ourselves and others, and professionally, to assess certain groups of people. </li></ul><ul><li>a personality theory should describe a structure and describe the dynamics of how behaviour is produced. </li></ul>
  • 7. Traits <ul><li>personality characteristic that makes one person different from another and/or that describes an individual’s personality. </li></ul><ul><li>Trait scores are continuous (quantitative) variables. Person given numeric score to indicate how much of a trait the person possesses. </li></ul><ul><li>Theoretically, there are a great many traits to describe everyone. </li></ul><ul><li>A person can be described on every trait. </li></ul>
  • 8. Trait Theory <ul><li>Eysenck and Cattell saw personality as a collection of traits= underlying characteristics which determine behaviour and make that behaviour possible to predict. Can predict behaviour in all situations. </li></ul><ul><li>E.g., if a tennis player is identified as assertive they are assertive regardless of the situation. </li></ul>
  • 9. Cattell’s Trait Theory <ul><li>Cattell’s Method </li></ul><ul><ul><li>inductive method to gather data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3 different methods for gathering data. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>L data </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Q data </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>T data </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Divided traits into common and unique traits </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Approach yielded 35 primary/first-order traits </li></ul></ul>
  • 10. Measurement <ul><li>Cattell wanted to systematically & methodically describe personality. </li></ul><ul><li>Important to have method for obtaining reliable & valid measure of personality factors. </li></ul><ul><li>Best known personality test = 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) that can be used with normal PPs & clinical populations. </li></ul>
  • 11. Types of data <ul><li>1. Q-data ( questionnaire data) –is obtained by asking people to describe themselves in response to a set of standard questions (Multiple choice, true/false). </li></ul><ul><li>Pros - easy to administer & quick access to information. </li></ul><ul><li>Con - people may impression manage (e.g., lie to make themselves look good). </li></ul>
  • 12. Types of data <ul><li>2. T-data (objective test data) – obtained by asking people to take various tests (projective, physical, reaction times) in which purpose of test isn’t obvious. </li></ul><ul><li>Pros - this should reduce impression managing; provides objective data. </li></ul><ul><li>Cons - objective tests may be of limited use. </li></ul>
  • 13. Types of data <ul><li>3. L-data (life record data) –obtained by gathering life history of person (personal records), such as grade point average, driving history, letters of recommendation, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Pros - information can be obtained with requiring PPs to fill out questionnaires. </li></ul><ul><li>Cons - provides limited information about individual. </li></ul>
  • 14. Eysenck’s Factor Theory <ul><li>Three General Superfactors </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Extraversion </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Neuroticism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Psychoticism </li></ul></ul>
  • 15. Eysenck’s Theory of Personality (1947) <ul><li>700 neurotic battle-fatigued soldiers </li></ul><ul><li>Factor analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Two dimensions </li></ul>Aggressive Active Sociable carefree Passive Calm Moody quiet
  • 16. Eysenck continued …………… <ul><li>Eysenck later added a third dimension: </li></ul><ul><li>Psychotic Non- psychotic </li></ul><ul><li>According to Eysenck, a person could be located anywhere along the dimensions. </li></ul>
  • 17. TASK <ul><li>From your textbook P.155 make bullet point notes on the biological basis of Eysenck’s Trait Theory. </li></ul>
  • We Need Your Support
    Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

    Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

    No, Thanks