Slides

PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource

Description
1. Should a psychological study...<br />Put the participants wellbeing first?<br />Put the knowledge and understanding of human behaviour first...?<br…
Categories
Published
of 22
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  • 1. Should a psychological study...<br />Put the participants wellbeing first?<br />Put the knowledge and understanding of human behaviour first...?<br />Which is the most important thing??<br />
  • 2. Debates: Milgram (1963)<br />Looking into whether Milgram’s research can be justified.<br />
  • 3. Milgram (1963)<br />As we know, Milgram’sexperiment is one of the most controversial psychological studies ever carried out.<br />It is incredibly unethical by today’s standards of research and has been heavily criticised.<br />Psychiatrist Bruno Bettelheim argued; “These experiments are so vile, the intention with which they were engaged in is so vile, that nothing these experiments show has any value.”<br />But do you agree?<br />
  • 4. However...<br />Psychologists must weigh up the costs against the benefits.<br />They must ask; “What are the costs to the participants versus the benefits of understanding that can be gained from the results?”<br />
  • 5. Task...<br />Complete the handout by filling in a definition of the ethical issue raised...<br />Then produce an argument that defends why Milgram had to break it...<br />And one that criticises him for breaking it...<br />
  • 6. Deception<br />The entire experiment was a hoax!<br />It had nothing to do with punishment and learning.<br />Nearly all the participants interviewed after the study said that they believed they had been shocking the learner.<br />
  • 7. Deception<br />Milgram argued that “illusion is used when necessary in order to set the stage for the revelation of certain difficult-to-get-at-truths”.<br />Milgram also interviewed participants afterwards to find out the effect of the deception. Apparently 83.7% said that they were “glad to be in the experiment”.<br />1.3% said that they wished they had not been involved.<br />
  • 8. Deception<br />Does that make it okay?<br />Deception is often necessary, but to what lengths might an experimenter go?<br />How do you respond to Milgram’s defence?<br />
  • 9. Informed Consent<br />Informed consent was not possible – why?<br />Participants were (according to Milgram), “misinformed”.<br />He prefers this expression to “deceived”?<br />What is the difference between the two expressions?<br />What difference does it make to Milgram versus what difference does it make to the participant?<br />
  • 10. Informed Consent<br />Milgram argued that there are two ways of dealing with the ‘problem’ of informed consent;<br /><ul><li>Prior general consent: obtaining consent from participants and informing that they may be misinformed about its purpose.
  • 11. Presumptive consent: ask people not taking part whether they think the experiment is acceptable and how they think the participants will react.</li></li></ul><li>Protection of Participants<br />“I observed a mature and initially poised businessman enter the laboratory smiling and confident. Within 20 minutes he was reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck, who was rapidly approaching a point of nervous collapse...”<br />(An observer’s account taken from Milgram, 1963)<br />
  • 12. Protection of Participants<br />According to Milgram, many participants showed signs of nervous tension; especially when administering high voltage shocks.<br />Another sign of tension was the appearance of nervous laughter.<br />Full blown seizures were observed for 3 participants; one so violent that the experiment was stopped.<br />
  • 13. Protection of Participants<br />In his defence, Milgram argued that these effects were only short term.<br />Additionally what had been the original prediction from the many psychologists about what would happen in these studies?<br />So Milgram argued that he didn’t expect it!<br />Milgram also interviewed the participants one year after the event and concluded that most were happy that they had taken part.<br />
  • 14. The Right to Withdraw<br />The BPS states that researchers should make it plain to participants that they are free to withdraw at any time (regardless of payment).<br />Did Milgram give participants an opportunity to withdraw?<br />
  • 15. The Right to Withdraw<br />Milgram referred to his participants as “volunteers”.<br />Why does this effect the “right to withdraw” more than if he called them participants?<br />
  • 16. The Right to Withdraw<br />Participants were told that “the money was theirs” just for coming to the laboratory; but they were not told that they could withdraw at any time.<br />In fact the whole point was that they didn’t withdraw!<br />How was withdrawal made difficult?<br />
  • 17. The Right to Withdraw<br />The experimenter gave three verbal prods which essentially discouraged withdrawal from the experiment:<br />Please continue. Or Please go on.<br />The experiment requires that you continue.<br />It is absolutely essential that you continue.<br />You have no other choice, you must go on.<br />
  • 18. The Right to Withdraw<br />Are the verbal prods justified?<br />Which of them do you think makes it most difficult for the participant to withdraw from the experiment?<br />Milgram argued that they are justified as the order for the participants to continue was the key to the study.<br />
  • 19. Debriefing<br />The BPS ethical guidelines state that participants must be debriefed after an experiment.<br />They must be made aware of the nature of the research and any deception should be revealed.<br />Did this happen with Milgram?<br />
  • 20. Debriefing<br />After the study, all participants were given interviews and psychological tests to ensure that they left the laboratory in a state of “wellbeing”.<br />They were told not to feel ashamed and that their behaviour was normal.<br />They were united with the “learner” and shook hands with them.<br />Participants were later sent a summary of the results and a questionnaire about their participation (in which over 80% said that they were happy to have taken part.<br />
  • 21. The Rules of Debating...<br />Each team must have:<br /><ul><li>Someone to present their main argument.
  • 22. Someone to second the argument with any criticisms of the other team’s argument.
  • 23. Someone to take minutes of the debate (i.e. Write down what happens)
  • 24. Someone should give the other team a score and their reasons why.
  • 25. The rest should prepare a question to ask the other team and work on a visual aid for the team</li></li></ul><li>In your groups...<br />Group 1, your task is to argue in the defence of Milgram and his experiment.<br />Group 2, your task is to argue the case against Milgram and his experiment.<br />Sort out who is doing what today! <br />Prepare your pieces together as much as you can today and finish for prep.<br />
  • We Need Your Support
    Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

    Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

    No, Thanks