Documents

IEEE TVT PoissoSerial Amplify-and-Forward Relay Transmission Systems in Nakagami-mFading Channels With a Poisson Interference Fieldn Relay

Description
In this paper, the end-to-end performance of a wireless relay transmission system that employs amplify-and-forward (AF) relays and operates in an interference-limited Nakagami-m fading environment is studied. The wireless links from one relay node to another experience Nakagami-mfading, and the number of interferers per hop is Poisson distributed. The aggregate interference at each relay node is modeled as a shot-noise process whose distribution follows anα-stable process. For the considered system, analytical expressions for the moments of the end-to-end signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), the end-to-end outage probability (OP), the average bit-error probability (ABEP), and the average channel capacity are obtained. General asymptotic expressions for the end-to-end ABEP are also derived. The results provide useful insights regarding the factors affecting the performance of the considered system. Monte Carlo simulation results are further provided to demonstrate the validity of the proposed mathematical analysis.
Categories
Published
of 14
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 63, NO. 5, JUNE 2014 2183 Serial Amplify-and-Forward Relay TransmissionSystems in Nakagami- m Fading ChannelsWith a Poisson Interference Field Valentine A. Aalo,  Senior Member, IEEE  , Kostas P. Peppas,  Member, IEEE  , George P. Efthymoglou,  Member, IEEE  ,Mohammed M. Alwakeel, and Sami S. Alwakeel,  Member, IEEE   Abstract —In this paper, the end-to-end performance of a wire-less relay transmission system that employs amplify-and-forward(AF) relays and operates in an interference-limited Nakagami- m fading environment is studied. The wireless links from one relaynode to another experience Nakagami- m  fading, and the num-ber of interferers per hop is Poisson distributed. The aggregateinterference at each relay node is modeled as a shot-noise processwhose distribution follows an α -stable process. For the consideredsystem, analytical expressions for the moments of the end-to-endsignal-to-interference ratio (SIR), the end-to-end outage probabil-ity (OP), the average bit-error probability (ABEP), and the aver-agechannelcapacityareobtained.Generalasymptoticexpressionsfor the end-to-end ABEP are also derived. The results provideuseful insights regarding the factors affecting the performance of the considered system. Monte Carlo simulation results are furtherprovidedtodemonstratethevalidityoftheproposedmathematicalanalysis.  Index Terms —Amplify-and-forward (AF), average bit-errorprobability (ABEP), channel capacity, cochannel interference,Fox’s H-function, Meijer’s G-function, multihop relaying, Poissoninterference field. I. I NTRODUCTION M ULTIHOP relaying has recently received considerableattention in the literature because of its potential toprovide more efficient and broader coverage in microwave andbent-pipe satellites links, as well as cellular, modern ad hoc,wireless local area, and hybrid wireless networks [1]. There-fore, multihop relaying, which is designed for extended cover- Manuscript received November 13, 2012; revised July 5, 2013 andOctober 12, 2013; accepted October 17, 2013. Date of publicationNovember 14, 2013; date of current version June 12, 2014. This work wassupported by the Sensor Networks and Cellular Systems Research Centerof the University of Tabuk. The review of this paper was coordinated byProf. J. Y. Chouinard.V. A. Aalo is with the Department of Computer and Electrical Engineeringand Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431USA , and also with SNCS Research Center, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia(e-mail: aalo@fau.edu).K. P. Peppas is with the Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications,National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos,” 15310 Athens, Greece(e-mail: kpeppas@iit.demokritos.gr).G. P. Efthymoglou is with the Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece (e-mail: gefthymo@unipi.gr).M. M. Alwakeel is with the Sensor Networks and Cellular Systems ResearchCenter, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia (e-mail: malwakeel@ut.edu.sa).S. S. Alwakeel is with the Department of Computer Engineering, King SaudUniversity, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia, and also with the Sensor Networksand Cellular Systems Research Center, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491,Saudi Arabia (e-mail: swakeel@ksu.edu.sa).Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TVT.2013.2291039 age and throughput enhancement, has been adopted in severalwireless standards [2]–[4]. In a multihop relaying system,intermediateidlenodesthatareclosertothetransmitterthanthedestination operate as relays between the source node and thedestination node when the direct link between the source nodeand the destination node is deeply faded or highly shadowed.Various protocols have been proposed to achieve the benefitsof multihop transmission. One of them is the so-called amplify-and-forward (AF) protocol, in which the received signal issimply amplified and forwarded to the receiver without per-forming any decoding [5]. The performance of multihop AFrelaying systems in series has been addressed in many pastworks based on the assumption that the system performanceis limited by Gaussian [6], [7] or generic noise [8]. On the otherhand, practical relaying systems generally employ frequencyreuse, which results in cochannel interference. The impact of cochannel interference on the performance of AF relay systemsin a fading environment has been studied in many recent works,assumingafixednumberofinterferingsignalsthatareRayleighor Nakagami- m  distributed at each relay node and at the desti-nationnode.(See[9]–[18]andreferencesthereinforexamples.)However, in a practical wireless environment, the numberof interfering signals at each relay may be a random variableas well. Moreover, in many wireless networks, the interfer-ing signals also experience attenuation due to path loss andshadowing, whereas their location and activity around thereceiving node may vary randomly [19]. Specifically, in theemergingheterogeneouscellularsystems,thepositionsofmanyinfrastructure elements are unknown  a priori,  and the presenceof unplanned network deployments should be considered bysystemdesigners.Moreover,duetotherandomspatialpositionsof the interferers, it is more insightful to provide performancemetrics that are averaged over fast fading and spatial positionof each interferer.Inspired by the seminal work in [20], in the emerging hetero-geneous cellular systems, a promising approach to model inter-ference is to treat the locations of some network elements (e.g.,cognitive radios and femto base stations) as points distributedaccordingtothespatialPoissonpointprocess(PPP).Thismodeloffers analytical flexibility and can provide insightful informa-tionontheeffectofcriticalstatistical–physicalparametersonthesystem performance. For these reasons, network interferencemodeling based on PPP spatial models has attracted the interestof many researchers. Specifically, in [21] and [22], PPPs have 0018-9545 © 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.  2184 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 63, NO. 5, JUNE 2014 been used to model cochannel interference from macrocellularbase stations. Cross-tier interference from femtocells was dis-cussed in [23] and [24], whereas in [25], cochannel interferencein ad hoc networks was investigated. Cochannel interference asa generic source of interference was addressed in [26] and [27].In [28], a unified framework for interference characterizationsand analysis in the unlicensed frequency bands was presented,assuming that interferers can have any power spectral densityand are distributed according to a Poisson process in spaceand frequency domains. The performance of diversity receiversin a Rayleigh fading environment and network interferencefrom a Poisson field of interference sources was addressed in[29]. In [30], a simplified interference model for heterogeneousnetworks to analyze downlink performance in a fixed size cellin a Poisson field of interferers was proposed. In [31], theperformance of multiantenna systems in a Poisson field of interferers was addressed.To the best of our knowledge, although the PPP interfer-ence model has been used extensively in a variety of wirelessnetworks to account for the randomness in the number, thelocation, and the activity of the interferers, this model hasrarely been applied to the relay and destination nodes of amultihop relay network. Two recent examples include [32]and [33]. Specifically, in [32], analytical expressions for theoutage probability (OP) and average bit-error rate of dual-hop AF relaying, using the best relay in a 2-D Poisson fieldof relays, were derived. In [33], the random access transportcapacity of multihop AF relaying in a Poisson interference fieldwas addressed. In this paper, we analyze the performance of multihop AF systems in the presence of a Poisson distributedinterference field, in which the relay is assumed to possess per-fect channel state information. The interference model adoptedin this paper is based on the assumption that the number of interferers is a Poisson distributed random variable, whereasthe terminals are randomly distributed over the network areaand undergo Nakagami- m  fading. Moreover, the wireless linksbetween relay nodes are assumed to be subject to Nakagami- m fading as well. It is also noted that the interference model underconsideration takes into account the randomness in the numberand location of the interferers and the effect of path loss for theinterfering signals. The main contributions of this paper are asfollows.ã Using the theory of Fox’s H-functions and Mellin–Barnesintegrals, a novel closed-form expression for the probabil-ity density function (pdf) of the aggregate interference isfirst derived. This result is afterward used to obtain closed-form expressions for important statistics of the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) of each hop, i.e., the pdf, thecumulative distribution function (cdf) of the SIR, and themoment-generating function (MGF) of the inverse SIR.ã Exact analytical expressions for the  u th moment of theend-to-end SIR are derived.ã Exact analytical expressions and closed-form lowerbounds for the OP are derived. These bounds become tightat high values of SIR.ã Exactanalyticalexpressionsandtightlowerboundsfortheaverage bit-error probability (ABEP) of digital modulationschemes and exact analytical expressions for the average TABLE IM ATHEMATICAL  O PERATORS AND  F UNCTIONS channel capacity are derived in terms of single integrals.Such integrals can be efficiently evaluated by employingGauss quadrature techniques.ã An asymptotic error rate performance analysis is pre-sented.Thisprovidesinsightsintotheparametersaffectingsystem performance under the presence of interference.The proposed analysis is tested and verified by numericallyevaluated results accompanied with Monte Carlo simulations.The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. InSection II, some important properties of the Fox’s H-function,which are frequently used throughout this paper, are sum-marized. Section III outlines the system and the interferencemodels. In Section IV, the statistical properties of the end-to-end SIR are investigated. In Section V, analytical expressionsfor the  u th moment of the end-to-end SIR, the OP, the ABEP,and the average channel capacity are presented. In Section VI,the various performance results and their interpretationsare presented. Finally, concluding remarks are presented inSection VII.For the convenience of the reader, a comprehensivelist of the mathematical operators and functions used in thispaper is presented in Table I.II. M ATHEMATICAL  P RELIMINARIES Throughout this paper, Fox’s H-function is used to obtainanalytical expressions for the statistics of the end-to-end SIRand for the important performance metrics of interest, suchas the OP, the ABEP, and the average channel capacity. Here,known results on Fox’s H-function are summarized to make thispaper more accessible.  Definition 1:  The Fox’s H-function is defined as[36, Eq. (1.2)] H  k,n p,q  x  ( a  p ,A  p )( b q ,B q )   =  12 πı   C  kj =1  Γ( b j  + B j s )   pj = n +1  Γ( a j  + A j s ) ×  nj =1  Γ( 1 − a j  − A j s )  qj = k +1  Γ( 1 − b j  − B j s ) x − s ds  (1)  AALO  et al. : SERIAL AF RELAY TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS IN NAKAGAMI- m  FADING CHANNELS 2185 where  C  is a suitable contour separating the poles of   Γ( b j  + B j s )  from the poles of   Γ( 1 − a j  − A j s ) .Note that, for  A j  =  B j  =  1, the Fox’s H-Function reducesto the more familiar Meijer’s G-function [35, Eq. (8.2.1)]. Thefollowing identities presented serve as a direct consequence of the definition of the H-function by the application of certainproperties of gamma functions. Property 1:  There holds the formula [36, Eq. (1.58)] H  k,n p,q  x  ( a  p ,A  p )( b q ,B q )   =  H  n,kq,p  1 x  ( 1 − b q ,B q )( 1 − a  p ,A  p )  .  (2) Property 2:  The following reduction formulas are valid[36, Eqs. (1.56, 1.57)]: H  k,n p,q  x  ( a 1 ,A 1 ) ,..., ( a  p ,A  p )( b 1 ,B 1 ) ,..., ( b q − 1 ,B q − 1 ) , ( a 1 ,A 1 )  =  H  k,n − 1  p − 1 ,q − 1  x  ( a 2 ,A 2 ) ,..., ( a  p ,A  p )( b 1 ,B 1 ) ,..., ( b q − 1 ,B q − 1 )   (3)provided that  n ≥ 1 and  q > k  and H  k,n p,q  x  ( a 1 ,A 1 ) ,..., ( a  p − 1 ,A  p − 1 ) , ( b 1 ,B 1 )( b 1 ,B 1 ) ,..., ( b q ,B q )  =  H  k − 1 ,n p − 1 ,q − 1  x  ( a 1 ,A 1 ) ,..., ( a  p − 1 ,A  p − 1 )( b 2 ,B 2 ) ,..., ( b q ,B q )   (4)provided that  k  ≥ 1 and  p > n .The  r th-order derivative of Fox’s H-function can be obtainedusing the following property. Property 3:  Identity (5), shown at the bottom of the page,holds [36, Eq. (1.83)], where  h >  0.Throughout this paper, integral transforms of Fox’sH-function are used to derive the main results. The Mellin andLaplace transforms of the Fox’s H-function are of particularinterest. An important property of the H-function states thatthe Mellin transform of the product of two Fox’s H-functionsis also a Fox’s H-function, as summarized in the followingtheorem. Theorem 1:  The following integral identity is valid[36, p. 60], [35, Eq. (2.25.1.1)]: ∞   0 x α − 1 H  s,tu,v  σx  ( c u ,C  u )( d v ,D v )  H  k,n p,q  ωx r  ( a  p ,A  p )( b q ,B q )  dx =  σ − α H  k + t,n + s p + v,q + u   ωσ r  (˜ a  p + v ,  ˜ A  p + v )(˜ b q + u ,  ˜ B q + u )   (6)where  α ,  σ , and  ω  are complex numbers;  r >  0; and (˜ a  p + v ,  ˜ A  p + v ) =  { ( a n ,A n ) , ( 1 − d v  − αD v ,rD v )( a n +1 ,A n +1 ) ,..., ( a  p ,A  p ) } (˜ b q + u ,  ˜ B q + u ) =  { ( b k ,B k ) , ( 1 − c u − αC  u ,rC  u )( b k +1 ,B k +1 ) ,..., ( b q ,B q ) } provided that the following conditions are satisfied: a ∗  ∆ = n  j =1 A j  −  p  j = n +1 A j  + k  j =1 B j  − q  j = k +1 B j  >  0 b ∗  ∆ = t  j =1 C  j  − u  j = t +1 C  j  + s  j =1 D j  − v  j = s +1 D j  >  0 r >  0 | arg σ | < b ∗ π/ 2  | arg ω | < a ∗ π/ 2 { α } + r  min 1 ≤ j ≤ k { b j /B j } + min 1 ≤ h ≤ s { d h /D h } >  0 { α } + r  max 1 ≤ j ≤ n { ( a j  − 1 ) /A j } + max 1 ≤ h ≤ t { ( c h − 1 ) /C  h } <  0 . Proof:  See [36, p. 60].   Another interesting property of the Fox’s H-function statesthat its inverse Laplace transform is also a Fox’s H-function.Specifically, the following theorem holds [36, Eq. (2.21)]. Theorem 2:  The following inverse Laplace transform pair isvalid: L − 1  t − ρ H  k,n p,q  at σ  ( a  p ,A  p )( b q ,B q )  ; t ; x  =  x ρ − 1 H  k,n p +1 ,q  ax − σ  ( a  p ,A  p ) , ( ρ,σ )( b q ,B q )   (7)provided that  { s } > 0,  σ> 0,  { ρ } + σ max 1 ≤ i ≤ n  [( 1 /A i ) − ( { a i } /A i )] > 0, and | arg a | < π ( a ∗ − σ ) , where  a ∗  is definedin Theorem I. Proof:  See [36, p. 51].   Finally, power series expansion of the Fox’s H-function,which are useful in deriving asymptotic results for importantperformance metrics of interest, are discussed. Specifically, thefollowing theorem holds [37, Eq. (3.4)]. Theorem 3:  Let us assume that the poles of   Γ( 1 − a j  − A j s ) ,  j  =  1 ,...,n , and  Γ( b j  + B j s ) ,  j  =  1 ,...,k  do not r  i =1  x ddx  − c i  x s H  k,n p,q  zx h  ( a 1 ,A 1 ) ,..., ( a  p ,A  p )( b 1 ,B 1 ) ,..., ( b q ,B q )   =  x s × H  k,n + r p + r,q + r  zx h  ( c 1 − s,h ) ,..., ( c r  − s,h ) , ( a 1 ,A 1 ) ,..., ( a  p ,A  p )( b 1 ,B 1 ) ,..., ( b q ,B q ) , ( c 1 − s +  1 ,h ) ,..., ( c r  − s +  1 ,h )   (5)  2186 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 63, NO. 5, JUNE 2014 coincide. Then, for  qj =1 B j  −   pj =1 A j  >  0,  x  =  0, or for  qj =1 B j  −   pj =1 A j  =  0, 0  < | x | <    pi =1 A − A i i  qj =1 B B j j  ,the H-function has the following power series expansion: H  k,n p,q  x  ( a  p ,A  p )( b q ,B q )   = k  j =1 ∞   =0 h ∗ j x bj + Bj (8)where the constants  h ∗ j  are given by [37, Eq. (3.3)] h ∗ j  = ( − 1 )   ! B j  ki =1 ,i  = j  Γ  b i − [ b j  +  ] B i B j   pi = n +1  Γ  a i − [ b j  +  ] A i B j  ×  ni =1  Γ  1 − a i  + [ b j  +  ] A i B j  qi = k +1  Γ  1 − b i  + [ b j  +  ] B i B j  .  (9) Proof:  See [37].   Finally, as far as the computational implementation of theFox’s H-function is concerned, it is noted that the Fox’sH-function is still not available in standard mathematical soft-ware packages such as Mathematica and Maple. Nevertheless,in two recent works, numerically efficient methods to evaluatethis function have been developed using Matlab [38, Table 2]and Mathematica [39, Appendix A]. Both methods are basedon the definition of the Fox’s H-function, which is given by (1).III. S YSTEM AND  I NTERFERENCE  M ODELS  A. System Model An  N  -hop wireless network is considered, which consists of source terminal  S  , several AF relay nodes  R n 1 and destinationterminal  D . The distance between the source and destinationnodes is assumed to be too long for a reliable direct communi-cation link to be established, given the power constraints andchannel fading effects. Therefore,  N   − 1 relay terminals areemployed via which the source and destination terminals cancommunicate. Each relay node and the destination terminal areinterrupted by a random number of cochannel interferers in aNakagami- m  fading environment.It is also assumed that the number of interfering signals at the n th relay terminal or at the destination is a Poisson distributeddiscrete random variable [12], [28], [40] and belongs to the PPP K n . The received signal at the  n th relay node is given by y n  =   P  R n − 1 d − v n / 2 n  a n x n − 1 +   P  I,n  i ∈K n r − v n / 2 i,n  ξ  i,n x i,n  + w n  (10)where  P  R n − 1  is the transmit power of the  ( n − 1 ) th node;  d n  isthe distance between nodes  R n − 1  and  R n ;  a n  is the Nakagami- m  distributed fading amplitude for the direct channel betweenthe said nodes;  ξ  i,n  is the Nakagami- m  distributed fadingamplitude for the channel from the  i th interfering transmitter to 1 Throughout this analysis and without loss of generality, index  n  =  1 , 2 ,...,N   − 1. the  n th relay node, respectively;  x n − 1  is the signal transmittedfrom the  ( n − 1 ) th node; and  x i,n  are the interfering signals tothe  n th node. Moreover,  r i,n  is the random distance from the i th interferers location to the  n th relay, and  v n  is the path-lossexponent in the environment surrounding the  n th relay termi-nal with 2 ≤ v n  ≤ 5. All the interfering signals are assumedtransmitted with the same power  P  I,n  [25], [41] but experiencemutually independent path loss and Nakagami- m  fading.The path-loss model used in this paper is unbounded andunrealistic in practice as the received power is infinite at d n  =  0 or  r i,n  =  0 [42]; thus, it may cause the moments of theaggregate interference to become infinite. However, this modelis commonly used in the literature as it leads to more tractablemathematical formulation (see, e.g., [20], [25], [28], [40], etc.).In practice, a small exclusion region may be placed aroundthe  n th relay, from within which interfering transmissions areprohibited [43].The average power of the desired signal on the link betweenrelays  R n − 1  and  R n  is given by  Ω s,n  =  P  R n − 1 d n − v n , whereasthe average power of the signal from the  i th interferer torelay node  n  is given by  Ω i,n  =  P  I,n r − v n i,n  . Throughout thisanalysis, an interference-limited system is considered, in whichthe effect of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) on systemperformance can usually be neglected. For an AF transmissionscheme, the  n th relay amplifies its received signal by gain  G n .One choice for the relay gain is proposed in [6] to be  G n  =   P  R n / ( P  R n − 1 a 2 n ) , which corresponds to the ideal gain at the n th AF relay that inverts the channel gain in the  n th link.Such a relay serves as a benchmark for all practical relayingsystems employing the AF protocol [6]. Then, the end-to-end instantaneous received SIR is related to the (normalizedby  N  ) harmonic mean of the individual per-hop SIRs [6], [13],[14], i.e., γ  eq  =   N   n =1 1 γ  n  − 1 (11)where γ  n  =  a 2 n Z  n (12)is the instantaneous SIR of the  n th hop for interference-limitedrelay systems. In (12),  Z  n  =   i ∈K n ξ  2 i,n r − v n i,n  κ n  is the totalinstantaneous interference power at the  n th relay, where  κ n  isa lognormal random variable that represents the effect of shad-owing. Note that the expression for the SIR in (12) accountsnot only for multipath fading but for the effect of location-dependentpathlossaswell,whereitisassumedthatthenumberof interferers  i  is a Poisson distributed random variable thatbelongs to PPP K n .  B. Distribution of the Aggregate Interference Throughout this analysis, it is assumed that the PPPs at eachrelay and the destination node are independent homogeneouspoint processes. Therefore, an independent interference modelis adopted [31], in which the relay and destination nodes haveno interferers in common. The statistical characteristics of the
Search
Similar documents
View more...
Tags
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x