Fashion & Beauty

(proofs) Middle Kingdom History, An Overview, In: Adela Oppenheim, Dorothea Arnold, et al. (editors) Ancient Egypt Transformed: The Middle Kingdom, 306-310

Description
(proofs) Middle Kingdom History, An Overview, In: Adela Oppenheim, Dorothea Arnold, et al. (editors) Ancient Egypt Transformed: The Middle Kingdom, 306-310
Published
of 5
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  306 Te Middle Kingdom, especially he welfh Dynasy, appears in laer sources as he classical period o Egypian ar, lieraure, and poliics. Kings such as Senwosre I, Senwosre III, and  Amenemha III were worshipped as gods and were sill known  by classical Greek auhors or heir monumens and miliary enerprises. Te firs hal o he welfh Dynasy was one o he mos decenralized periods o Egypian hisory. Local governors  buil huge, lavishly decoraed rock- cu ombs wih inscripions ha  were copied as lae as Roman imes. However, as he dynasy progressed, he counry became more cenralized, and royal acivi-ies were concenraed in a ew ceners by is end. Te Middle Kingdom is defined here as he second hal o he Elevenh Dynasy o he end o he Tireenh. Te period can be divided ino he early and lae Middle Kingdom, he later having  begun during he reign o Senwosre III, when many changes in adminisraion and culure ook place.􀀱 King liss rom he period are no preserved, bu here are ragmens o wo royal annals, one rom he reign o Senwosre I ha had once adorned a emple a Heliopolis􀀲 and anoher ound a Memphis ha daes o he reign o Amenemha II.󰀳 Tese sone inscripions once provided a year-  by-  year lis o all evens he Egypians el were imporan, alhough he preserved ragmens cover only a ew years and mainly record donaions o emples; miliary enerprises are also described. Te urin Canon, a ragmenary Ramesside papyrus (abou 󰀱󰀲􀀰􀀰 󰁂.󰁃.) ound in he nineeenh cenury, srcinally conained a lis o all Egypian kings wih he lenghs o heir reigns rom he myhical beginning o Egyp down o he end o he Second Inermediae Period. Te lis is a major source or he regnal years in he Elevenh and welfh Dynasies and or he order o Tireenh Dynasy kings.󰀴 Furhermore, here are several Ramesside king liss preserved on monumens ha provide evidence or he succession o kings. Tese liss name only he kings o he lae Elevenh and welfh Dynasies; evidenly he Tireenh Dynasy was regarded as “inerior.” Te  Aegyptiaca  o he Egypian pries Maneho, wriing in Greek in he hird cenury 󰁂.󰁃., is he main record or he division o Egypian hisory ino dynasies. Maneho includes a lis o welfh Dynasy kings o which he adds he lengh o heir reigns, evidenly regarding his period as more imporan. For he Elevenh and Tireenh Dynasies, he gives jus he oal number o kings and he lengh o heir combined rules. Maneho’s hisory books are oday known solely hrough laer hisorians,  who copied he inormaion hey hough significan. Alhough names are presened in Greek orm and numbers are ofen garbled, he work sill provides a rough ouline o he dynasic divisions. Te erm “Middle Kingdom,” inroduced by nineeenh- cenury Egypologiss, would no have been recognized by he ancien Egypians. Te main sources or reconsrucing a hisory o he Middle Kingdom are he conemporary inscribed monumens ound in Egyp. Tese sources are ragmenary, however, and inscripions reporing acual, as opposed o idealized, poliical evens are rare. Te royal unerary complexes o he Middle Kingdom have been  badly damaged, and in any case, such complexes normally do no ofen provide hisorical inormaion. Masabas and ombs o cour officials can conain more hisorical inormaion and some  were adorned wih long biographical inscripions, bu hey are also preserved merely in ragmens. Beter preserved are several rock- cu ombs o local governors in Upper and Middle Egyp, some o which conain longer biographical exs. Some o he emples buil and decoraed by Middle Kingdom kings hroughou he counry were inscribed wih longer exs, bu again hese are ofen largely desroyed. Anoher imporan source is he corpus o privae selae, known rom ombs and local emples, wih a significan number ound a Abydos (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX– XX). Tese depic he officials who commissioned hem, heir amilies, and someimes servans; selae o he early Middle King-dom in paricular are someimes inscribed wih a biography o he owner. Tose ha bear a king’s name (cas. XXX, XXX, XXX) ideniy fixed poins or known officials and occasionally year daes or kings and are an imporan source when laer king liss offer conflicing inormaion. Alhough a high percenage o selae dae o he lae Middle Kingdom, hese rarely include a royal name, an indicaion perhaps o diminished saus or he kings. A compara- ble source is he corpus o rock inscripions lef by members o expediions o quarries and oreign lands, which are known mainly rom he Easern Deser, Sinai, and Lower Nubia. Tese ofen give precise daes, he purpose o he expediion, and he names o he members o he enerprise. Alogeher, he sources or Middle Kingdom hisory are much broader han or he Old Kingdom and are disribued hroughou he counry.  Wolram Grajezki Middle Kingdom History An Overview MiddleKingdom_2P.indd 3066/5/15 2:35 PM  307  󰁷󰁯󰁬󰁦󰁲󰁡󰁭 󰁧󰁲󰁡󰁪󰁥󰁴󰁺󰁫󰁩  Adminisraive papyri ound a el- Lahun, in Tebes, and a oher sies shed ligh on he organizaion o Middle Kingdom Egyp. Tey include a se o palace accouns rom he Tireenh Dynasy ound a Tebes. Copies o leters rom viziers and lesser officials are also preserved. Scarab seals wih names and iles afford a uller picure o adminisraive uncions, and many include he names and iles o members o he royal amily (ca. XXX). Furhermore, archaeology has expanded he inorma-ion or he hisory o he period beyond he writen sources. For example, he orresses in Lower Nubia ates o Egypian rule in his region, and he rigid grid paterns o many Middle Kingdom setlemens provide evidence o some ype o cenral planning (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX–XX; ca. XXX). All hese sources presen a general picure o he broad lines o Middle Kingdom hisory. I is, noneheless, impossible o wrie his hisory as a sequence o evens in he modern sense. Many single incidens can be idenified rom he sources menioned, bu he real orces behind hem remain unknown. Civil wars, opposi-ion agains kings or imporan officials, palace inrigues, and power sruggles a he cour or wihin he royal amily are hardly menioned in he surviving sources; hese end o be visible only  when he winner o a sruggle reers o hem in a biography. AFFAIRS OF STATE IN THE MIDDLE KINGDOM  Afer he long reign o Pepi II, he Old Kingdom disinegraed ino a number o small chiedoms ruled by local governors, who in heory were sill under he king in Memphis bu in realiy aced independenly. Very litle is known abou he kings residing in Memphis during his ime. I is cerain, however, ha wo power  blocs, one in he norh, he oher in he souh, emerged during he so- called Firs Inermediae Period. In he norh, a line o kings ruled in he radiion o he Old Kingdom and perhaps resided in Herakleopolis a he enrance o he Fayum, as hey are called Herakleopolian kings in laer sources.Te Elevenh Dynasy was ounded in Tebes, in souhern Egyp, by local governors who adoped pars o he royal iulary. Te firs hree kings ook he name Ine wih he ile “son o Re” and added a Horus name in order o confirm heir claim o king-ship. Nebhepere Menuhoep II, son o he las Ine king, was considered he rue ounder o he Middle Kingdom (fig. XX[󰀱]). During his fify- one-  year reign he seems o have conquered he norh o Egyp, deeaing he Herakleopolian kings and reuniying he counry under his rule. Te exac iming o he evens in his reign is unknown, bu he king wice changed pars o his names, mos likely in response o seps in he conques o Egyp. Te final unificaion o he counry migh have happened in he second par o his reign, alhough apar rom some vague reerences, he even is no menioned or described in any known conemporary inscripion. Neverheless, in a New Kingdom depicion, Menuho-ep II appears nex o Menes, he legendary king who unified Egyp in he Firs Dynasy, and Nebpehire Ahmose II, he ounder o he New Kingdom, clearly demonsraing ha in laer imes he  was regarded as he ounder o a new era.󰀵 Te Elevenh and welfh Dynasies each consised o a line o rulers descended, wih one excepion, rom a single amily. Te second par o he Elevenh Dynasy had hree kings named Menuhoep, beginning wih Nebhepere Menuhoep II, who was he firs king o he period o have he fiveold royal iulary: he  birh name wih he ile “son o Re,” he hrone name, he Horus name, he wo Ladies name, and he gold Horus name. Boh Menuhoep II and his successor, Seankhkare Menuhoep III, commissioned many emples ha conained scenes showing hem  wih various deiies (cas. XXX, XXX, XXX), subsaniaing heir righul place wih he gods and heir own divine saus. Nebawire Menuhoep IV, he las king o he Elevenh Dynasy, was perhaps no relaed by amily ies o his predecessors. His shor reign is enigmaic, and he absence o his name rom laer king liss possi- bly indicaes ha i eiher was no seen as legiimae or was marked  by power sruggles.Te seven kings o he welfh Dynasy, which ruled or abou 󰀱􀀸􀀰 years, were named eiher Amenemha or Senwosre. Te dynasy ended wih he shor reign o Egyp’s firs known emale sole ruler, Nerusobek. One concern o he welfh Dynasy kings  was o resore he glory o he Old Kingdom. Indeed, Amenemha I chose as his Horus name “repeaing o birhs,” evidenly ideniy-ing himsel as he ounder o a new era, a concep also expressed in a lierary work oday known as Te    Prophecies of Neferti .󰀶  Amenemha I, called Ameny in he sory, is described as a king Fig. XX. Relie o Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II siing under a baldachin. Limestone. Eleventh Dynasty, reign o Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II (ca. 󰀲󰀰󰀵󰀱–󰀲󰀰󰀰󰀰 󰁢.󰁣.). Dendera, side wall o the king’s ka  chapel. Egyptian Museum, Cairo (JE 󰀴󰀶󰀰󰀶󰀸) MiddleKingdom_2P.indd 3076/5/15 2:35 PM  308 󰁭󰁩󰁤󰁤󰁬󰁥 󰁫󰁩󰁮󰁧󰁤󰁯󰁭 󰁨󰁩󰁳󰁴󰁯󰁲󰁹  who brings sabiliy o Egyp afer a period o disorder during he Firs Inermediae Period (he effors o he Elevenh Dynasy are evidenly ignored). Te kings o he welfh Dynasy were again  buried in pyramids, as hose o he Old Kingdom had been (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX–XX); he pyramid emple o Senwosre I is even closely modeled on Sixh Dynasy proo-ypes (see ca. XX). ile srings o early Middle Kingdom officials include many Old Kingdom iles, alhough hey seem o have los heir srcinal meanings. Funerary culs o Old Kingdom kings were also reacivaed.  A new approach o succession appeared or he firs ime in he welfh Dynasy, when in he wenieh year o his reign  Amenemha I chose his son Senwosre as coregen (fig. XX[󰀲]).󰀷 Senwosre I received he fiveold royal iulary and ruled as king in his own righ while his aher was sill living. Te younger king is prominen in he early welfh Dynasy sources, and mos daed documens name him. Te specific purpose o his ype o arrange-men is debaed in Egypology, bu one reason was doubless o secure he royal succession, as he deah o a king was always a criical momen. Indeed, wo lierary composiions o he Middle Kingdom, Te   eaching of Amenemhat   and Te   ale of Sinuhe  (cas. XXX, XXX), menion wha seems o be he assassinaion o  Amenemha I. Coregencies, atesed hroughou he dynasy, include one beween Senwosre III and Amenemha III ha migh have lased weny years. In sark conras o he welfh Dynasy, he Tireenh con-sised o a sequence o some fify kings who ruled over a period o 󰀱􀀵􀀰 years. A he beginning and end o he period, many reigns  were very shor, while in he middle some longer- ruling kings sa on he hrone or a oal o several decades. Tese kings were no all relaed, alhough some amily ies wihin he dynasy can be discerned, including ha o Khasekhemre Neerhoep I and Khaneerre Sebekhoep IV, who were brohers.󰀸 Tere is also he “king’s moher” and “king’s wie” Nubheepi, whose iles ates o a aher- o- son succession wihin he dynasy, bu he kings o  whom she was relaed have no been idenified.󰀹 Several kings seem o have sared ou as higher officials, alhough hard evidence is scarce. Evidenly, imporan amilies managed o place some o heir members on he hrone. King Khuawire Wega was per-haps “grea overseer o roops” beore becoming king, while Sekhemre- sewadjawi Sebekhoep III was “officer o he ruler’s crew.”􀀱󰀰 Several queens are known o have belonged o amilies o imporan officials.􀀱􀀱 Queen Aya came rom a amily conneced o he vizier Ankhu. Queen Nubkhaes was he siser o he “reporer o Tebes” Sebekemsa, and her uncle was he “high seward” Nebankh. Such close connecions beween officials and members o he royal amily have no as ye been atesed or he Elevenh or welfh Dynasy, alhough hey may have exised. Neverheless, i is hard o say wheher he concep o kingship changed in he Tireenh Dynasy, despie he ac ha, remarkably, some kings menion heir nonroyal parens on monumens, somehing no previously atesed.􀀱􀀲In he Elevenh Dynasy, he royal residence was mos likely a Tebes, where he ombs o he kings, heir wives, and he high couriers were locaed. A he beginning o he welfh Dynasy,  Amenemha I ounded a new royal residence in he norh called  Amenemha- Ijawi (Amenemha is he seizer o he wo Lands), ofen simply abbreviaed as Ijawi. Te move o he norh was evidenly boh pracical and symbolic. Locaed a he border  beween Upper and Lower Egyp, near he modern village o Lish, Ijawi was hereore a he poin where Egyp marked is reunifica-ion. Wih he move o he norh, he kings could also demonsrae heir connecion o he Old Kingdom, or is capial, Memphis, was only abou 􀀵􀀰 kilomeers o he norh o he new ciy. Furher-more, he new capial was close o he Fayum and migh indicae royal ineres in his oasis (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX–XX); he region beween Memphis and he Fayum was also he locaion o he royal pyramid complexes o he welfh and Tireenh Dynasies (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX–XX). Ijawi remained he capial ino he Tireenh Fig. XX. Relie o Senwosret I siing at an offering table. Limestone. welfh Dynasty, reign o Senwosret I (ca. 󰀱󰀹󰀶󰀱–󰀱󰀹󰀱󰀷 󰁢.󰁣.). Lisht, side wall o the entrance chapel o the king’s pyramid. Egyptian Museum, Cairo (JE 󰀶󰀳󰀹󰀴󰀲) fpo MiddleKingdom_2P.indd 3086/5/15 2:35 PM  309  󰁷󰁯󰁬󰁦󰁲󰁡󰁭 󰁧󰁲󰁡󰁪󰁥󰁴󰁺󰁫󰁩 Dynasy,􀀱󰀳 alhough in he lae Middle Kingdom, Tebes became a kind o second capial wih a royal palace. Kings seems o have spen increasing amouns o ime here, and a a cerain poin he cour permanenly moved o Tebes. Afer unificaion, Menuhoep II was aced wih he problem o ranserring he insiuions o he small Teban kingdom o hose o a unified sae. As a resul, new offices and officials were placed a he royal cour direcly under he king. Some o hese offices were new or he palace adminisraion; ohers, such as he  vizier, were aken rom he adminisraion o he Old Kingdom. Te highes sae officials received iles, such as “member o he elie” or “royal sealer,” ha announced heir posiions wihin he hierarchy a he royal cour and confirmed heir elevaed social saus. In addiion, however, hey had more specific designaions, such as “vizier,” “reasurer,” and “high seward,” which were he hree mos imporan offices hroughou he Middle Kingdom. Tese individuals were responsible or he adminisraion o he palace and he sae and were cerainly imporan poliical figures,  bu his ac is usually atesed only indirecly in conemporary sources. One such individual was he vizier Inefiqer, a leading figure who guided several expediions and miliary campaigns during he reigns o Amenemha I and Senwosre I. Te provincial adminisraion under Menuhoep II remained essenially inac, wih local governors reaining power and local cemeeries coninuing o flourish, as in he Firs Inermediae Period. In some places new governors were insalled, mos likely  because he king wished o place loyal officials in imporan posi-ions, paricularly as cerain sources imply ha uprisings occurred in he early Middle Kingdom. In some cases local governors a Khemenu (Hermopolis) received he ile o vizier.􀀱󰀴 I seems ha he power o he king was challenged by oher orces. Inscripions ound in he alabaser quarries o Hanub indeed repor disur- bances a he end o he Elevenh Dynasy. In Lower Nubia some local rulers even ook over royal iles. Tere are indicaions ha Senwosre I reorganized he provin-cial adminisraion and incorporaed i on all levels ino he cenral governmen on a scale no previously seen. An inscripion on he  Whie Chapel a Karnak, buil by Senwosre I, provides a lis o all provinces wih heir measuremens. Many provincial cemeeries sopped being used a abou he ime o Senwosre I’s reign, perhaps because o policies se by he king, and secors o he populaion were placed under he direc conrol o he cenral adminisraion. One revealing example is he new ile “overseer o he marshland dwellers,” which suggess ha he “marshland dwell-ers” were pu under an official o he cenral adminisraion by Senwosre I.􀀱󰀵 Anoher indicaion o a igher conrol over he counry is he inroducion under Senwosre I o he “grea com-pound,” an insiuion ha organized corvée labor or sae projecs, including pyramid building.􀀱󰀶 Local governors (nomarchs) did, however, remain in office and sill had subsanial resources; a sraegically imporan places such as Qaw el- Kebir new lines o governors were even insalled. Alhough hese were powerul officials, here is no quesion ha hey were loyal o he king, paricularly as royal names appear requenly in heir ombs. Sen- wosre I also sared o rebuild almos all he emples hroughou he counry. Te old mud-  brick srucures were replaced by sone  buildings decoraed wih relies and inscripions. Tis building program mos likely wen along wih he reorganizaion o he provincial adminisraion under he king. Local emples and relaed religious maters were now placed under he direc conrol o he cenral adminisraion. Te kings afer Senwosre I did no  build o he same exen across he counry, perhaps because em-ples were already ully under he conrol o he royal adminisraion. A cenury laer, Senwosre III wen one sep urher in cenral-izing he counry. Under his rule, even he local governors los power and were hereore no longer able o build monumenal ombs. Furher changes become visible in he adminisraion.􀀱󰀷 Many new iles appeared a all levels, while many older ones disappeared.􀀱󰀸 o give one example, he early Middle Kingdom ile “seward” now included more deailed designaions, such as “seward who couns catle” or “seward o he king’s wie,” indica-ing a srong demand or greaer precision and conrol.  Alhough local governors are sill well atesed in he Tir-eenh Dynasy, hey had limied resources and were much more conrolled by he cenral governmen. Tis developmen reached is peak in he same dynasy, during which adminisraive iles  were even more specific han in earlier and laer periods. A he same ime, scarab seals incised wih he names and iles o officials also came ino use, whereas in he early Middle Kingdom seals  were decoraed only wih geomeric or floral paterns. I became common o seal goods wih unfired lumps o clay on which designs rom he underside o scarabs were impressed (see ca. XXX). Seal impressions belong o he mos common finds a setlemens o he period, again demonsraing a wish or a igh conrol o people and goods. In adminisraive documens people mos ofen appear  wih double names, which were obviously mean o avoid conu-sion, as some Egypian names recur requenly. Tere are indicaions o a permanen “inner colonizaion” o Egyp hroughou he Middle Kingdom. Less developed and less populaed pars o he counry were now culivaed and placed under he cenral governmen. In several places in Egyp, planned setlemens were buil in a grid patern, mos likely in conjuncion  wih he urher expansion o he counry. Tese setlemens also perhaps indicae populaion movemens ino less developed areas such as he edge o he Easern Dela,􀀱󰀹 an early example o which is he planned communiy excavaed a ell el- Daba (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX–XX). Wahsu, a own buil nex o a unerary emple o Senwosre III a Abydos (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX–XX), may have uncioned as a local cener and example o “inner colonizaion,” while even Tebes was rebuil on a grid patern. Te mos imporan insance o he inner colonizaion, how-ever, is he Fayum Oasis. Tis marshy river oasis was deemed unsuiable or agriculure in he Old Kingdom, bu rom he begin-ning o he welfh Dynasy on, he marshes were culivaed, perhaps under direc cenral conrol. El- Lahun, a subsanial own in he Fayum, was also buil on a grid patern close o he pyramid o Senwosre II. I served as a pyramid own, bu is size and he documens ound here indicae ha i was par o he “inner colo-nizaion” as well; i cerainly was also se up and uncioned as a MiddleKingdom_2P.indd 3096/5/15 2:35 PM  310 󰁭󰁩󰁤󰁤󰁬󰁥 󰁫󰁩󰁮󰁧󰁤󰁯󰁭 󰁨󰁩󰁳󰁴󰁯󰁲󰁹 END OF THE MIDDLE KINGDOM Te end o he Middle Kingdom remains shrouded in mysery, and here is no ye any consensus among Egypologiss as o is iming and exac causes, alhough i is clear ha he close o he Tir-eenh Dynasy was relaed o evens in he norh. Te beginning and he end o he Tireenh Dynasy appear in our sources as a long line o weak, shor- reigning kings; privae monumens are sill abundan, bu he number and qualiy o royal monumens decline. Since he end o he welfh Dynasy, people coming rom he Levan had setled in he Easern Dela. Teir cener was Avaris (modern ell el- Daba), a subsanial ciy under Egypian rule bu  wih a parially Levanine culure and populaion. A some poin during he Tireenh Dynasy, local rulers in he Dela assumed royal iles and declared independence. Tese kings, who reigned or shor periods o ime, migh have weakened he power o he cenral adminisraion. Te iming o hese evens is uncerain, bu i is possible ha he adopion o royal iles by local rulers hap-pened as early as he mid- Tireenh Dynasy. Tese local rulers in he norh appear in laer sources as he Foureenh Dynasy and are mainly atesed on seals, whose daing is highly problemaic. Te disribuion o surviving monumens suggess ha he Egypian kings o he Tireenh Dynasy ranserred heir power  base rom he Memphie area in he norh o Tebes in he souh, a poin ha migh be seen o mark he end o he Tireenh Dynasy and he Middle Kingdom. Te las ruler atesed in boh he norh and he souh is Merneerre Aya, a mid- Tireenh Dynasy king according o he Ramesside urin Canon (fig. XX􀀴). Mos likely around his ime, a new line o kings known as he Hyksos sared o rule a Avaris, some o whom are atesed in a wider range o sources.  Wih he loss o norhern Egyp, Egypian kings had reduced resources. Te ew surviving royal inscripions rom Tebes repor clashes wih unnamed enemies. Souh o he Egypian border, in Nubia, he powerul kingdom o Kerma emerged and became a second enemy or Egyp. A recenly discovered inscripion o he local governor Sebeknakh, ound in his omb a el- Kab, even men-ions a Nubian raid on Egyp.􀀲󰀳 In he changed balance o power, he Teban kings ound hemselves squeezed beween he Kerma people o he souh and he Hyksos kings a Avaris in he norh. Tus began he new world o he Second Inermediae Period.local cener. Te pyramids o Senwosre II and Amenemha III are locaed on he eas side o he Fayum, a posiion chosen perhaps o  be close o newly culivaed land. Oher royal monumens in he Fayum ha are atesed under Senwosre I and Amenemha III include emples, colossal saues, an obelisk sela o Senwosre I, and a planned setlemen norh o he Fayum (see “ile o essay” in his volume, pp. XXX–XX). EGYPT AND THE OUTSIDE WORLD Shorly afer unificaion, Nebhepere Menuhoep II began raiding Lower Nubia, he Easern Deser, and perhaps Souh Palesine.􀀲󰀰 Recenly a rock inscripion naming he king was ound a he Gebel Uweina, near he modern Libyan- Sudanese- Egypian  border.􀀲􀀱 While he inscripion migh no prove miliary campaigns  were underaken so ar o he wes, i is a leas evidence o rading conacs. Raids are atesed or all o he Elevenh and welfh Dynasies (fig. XX􀀳), bu only Lower (norhern) Nubia was conquered and even parly colonized. Te ull conques o he province sared under Senwosre I and was compleed by Senwosre III. Huge orresses were buil o conrol hese new souhern provinces (see “Egyp’s Expanding Worldview” in his  volume, pp. XX–XX; ca. XXX). Similar orificaions are no known rom he border wih Palesine, bu lierary reerences menion somehing here called he Walls o he Ruler, which was mos likely a chain o orresses a he easern border. Especially in he welfh Dynasy, many expediions were sen o he Easern Deser and he Sinai in order o collec raw maerials. Expediions o he Red Sea and o he souheasern land o Pun, hus ar unlocaed, are also well known (see ca. XXX).􀀲􀀲 In he Tireenh Dynasy a ew atesaions or expediions o he Easern Deser exis, bu no o he Sinai.Miliary enerprises brough many oreigners o Egyp. Te ragmenary annal inscripion o Amenemha II, ound a Memphis, repors a raid on wo owns ha resuled in he rans-por o Egyp o 󰀱,􀀵􀀵􀀴 people who were aken o he pyramid o he king, mos likely as a workorce. Middle Kingdom liss o servans ofen conain numerous oreign names, indicaing ha oreigners were no unusual, a leas in some segmens o sociey (see ca. XXX). Fig. XX. Globular vessel with the name o Merneerre Aya. Obsidian. Tirteenth Dynasty, reign o Merneerre  Aya (ca. 󰀱󰀷󰀰󰀱–󰀱󰀶󰀷󰀷 󰁢.󰁣.). Te Metropolitan Museum o Art, New York, Purchase, Fletcher Fund and Te Guide Founda-tion Inc. Gif, 󰀱󰀹󰀶󰀶 (󰀶󰀶.󰀹󰀹.󰀱󰀷) Fig. XX. Detail o a wall painting o the siege o a Canaanite town. Eleventh Dynasty, reign o Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II (ca. 󰀲󰀰󰀵󰀱–󰀲󰀰󰀰󰀰 󰁢.󰁣.). Tebes, el-Asasi, pillar IIb o the tomb o Inte ( 󰀳󰀸󰀶). See fig. XX p. 󰀱󰀵󰀸 MiddleKingdom_2P.indd 3106/5/15 2:35 PM
Search
Similar documents
View more...
Tags
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x