1 - 1 - Lecture 2-1 Kierkegaard, Martensen and Hegelianism (21 min).rtf

[MUSIC] Hello and welcome to the second lecture of Soren Kierkegaard: Subjectiit! Iron! and the Crisis of Modernit!# In the first lecture we learned that there were a number of im$ortant as$ects of the thought of Socrates that were a great ins$iration for Kierkegaard# %e talked about Socratic iron! the idea of a$oria Socrates& role as the gadfl! of 'thens Socrates& daimon and finall! Socrates& so(called maieutic art# It was useful to see these conce$ts in their original conte)t in *lato&s
of 12
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  [MUSIC]Hello and welcome to the second lecture ofSoren Kierkegaard: Subjectiit! Iron! andthe Crisis of Modernit!#In the first lecture we learned thatthere were a number of im$ortantas$ects of the thought of Socrates thatwere a great ins$iration for Kierkegaard#%e talked about Socratic iron! the ideaof a$oria Socrates& role as the gadfl!of 'thens Socrates& daimon and finall! Socrates& so(called maieutic art#It was useful to see these conce$ts intheir srcinal conte)t in *lato&s dialoguessince this will gie us a greatera$$reciation for Kierkegaard&s uni+ue useof them#,ut we still hae one brief errand toattend to before we get to this#Kierkegaard&s understanding of Socrateswas of course based onhis reading of the te)ts of *lato -eno$hon and 'risto$hanes that is the $rimar! .reek sources#,ut it was also largel! sha$ed b! theinter$retation of the famous .erman$hiloso$her Hegel with whom he was in a constant criticaldialogue in /he Conce$t of Iron!#Hegel&s $hiloso$h! was a highl! $o$ulartrend at the Uniersit! of Co$enhagen inthe late 0123s when Kierkegaard was astudent and was writing this work#So in this lecture we&ll e)$lore firstthe $resence of Hegel at the Uniersit! duringKierkegaard&s time and then we&ll go through Hegel&s anal!sisof Socrates treating the sameto$ics that we introduced last time thatis Socratic iron! a$oria thedaimon and so forth#%e&ll see how Kierkegaard is ins$ired andinfluenced b! theim$ortant historical role that Hegelascribes to the $erson of Socrates#%hat does it mean to sa! that we areautonomous45or most $eo$le toda! autonom! is just a  fanc! word for freedom#6iterall! autonom! just means that one isable to gie a law to oneself7in other words one can decide foroneself what one wishes to do#So to sa! that someone is not autonomousmeans that that $ersonis subject to e)ternal laws that oftencontradict what one wants to do#So in this sense we all generall!think that autonom! is a good thing just as we think that freedom is a goodthing#I don&t want someone telling me what to door im$osing arbitrar! rules and regulationson me that limit m! freedom#/oda! autonom! is conceied as auniersall! $ositiething but this was not alwa!s the case#In some societies the main alue was notfor $eo$leto go out and act on their own desires andwishes#Instead the most im$ortant thing was forthemto follow a set of rules that hadbeen agreed u$on b! one&s famil! cultureor societ!#/his includes dressing in a certain wa! oracting in accordance with acce$ted norms#'ccording to this iew to actautonomousl! is asign of arrogance and disregard for one&sfamil! or tradition#/his is often associated with religion#5or e)am$le in religious ceremonieseer!one is e)$ected to do thesame thing to $erform the same ceremon!in the same wa!#It&s im$ossible to be an indiidualist ornon(conformist in a ceremonial conte)t#Moreoer in Christianit! it&s thoughtthat human beings are finite and sinful#/he! are onl! able to gain salation notb! their ownacts alone but b! the grace of .od#It&s therefore considered not justarrogant but een irreligious toact as if one can determine the truth foroneself#In this sense autonom! is conceied as anegatie thing#  To say that someone is not autonomous means that that person is subject to external laws often contradict what  /his issue which is still er! much alietoda! was one that was im$ortant inKierkegaard&s time#It was themati8ed b! a !oung 9anishscholar named Hans 6assen Martensen . %hen Kierkegaard was a student here at theUniersit!of Co$enhagen in the 0123s the $hiloso$h!of the.erman $hiloso$her Hegel became a majortrend among students#/he ke! figure for the $o$ularit! of HegelwasMartensen who was just fie !ears olderthan Kierkegaard#In 012 Martensen returned to Co$enhagenfrom a two(!eartri$ that he took to ,erlin Heidelberg Munich ;ienna and *aris#<n his tri$ Martensen met most of theleading figures in *russia andthe .erman states who were discussingHegel&s $hiloso$h! at this time#%hen he returned to Co$enhagen Martensenimmediatel! began an illustrious academiccareer#<n =ul! 0>th 012? he defended hisdissertationhich was entitled <n the 'utonom! ofHuman Self(Consciousness . In this work he criticall! treated thes!stems of the .ermanthinkers Kant Schleiermacher and Hegel#Martensen argued that these $hiloso$hiesallre$resented s!stems of autonom! that hebelieedfocused one(sidedl! on the $ower of theindiidual#'ccording to Martensen this fails torecogni8ethe $rofound de$endenc! of human beings on.od#%ith this to$ic Martensen can in a sense besaid to antici$ate Kierkegaard&s to$ic ofiron!# In both cases what&s at issue is the role of theindiidual orthe subject is(a(is the objectie order ofthings#,oth Martensen and Kierkegaard seem Danish scholar named Hans Lassen Martensen  to be in agreement that modernsubjectiit!or een relatiism has gone too far#Martensen&s ke! term for this is @modernautonom!@ while Kierkegaard&s is @iron! @but in the end the!&re talking about thesame set of issues#Martensen began lecturing at theUniersit!of Co$enhagen in the fall of 012?#It was here at Aegensen College thathe defended his dissertation in the same!ear#His courses soon became the talk of theentire uniersit!#Students from all disci$lines flocked tohear what he had to sa! since hewas in a sense giing an account of whathe had learned on his tri$about the most recent deelo$ments in$hiloso$h!and theolog! in the .erman(s$eakingstates#/o the consternation and ama8ement of theolder moreconseratie facult! Martensenimmediatel! becamea kind of academic celebrit!#/o the students he was an e)citing !oungscholar who coulds$eak to them in a wa! that the! had note)$erienced before#He $resented to them the basic ideas ofthe $hiloso$h!of Hegel which all of *russia and .erman!was talking about#<ne of Martensen&s students describes hisencounter withthese lectures as his intellectualawakening#He writes and I +uote @/he man who throughhis lectures made such a strong im$ressionon meand man! others was a !oung instructorwho had been a$$ointed to gie lectureson the recent histor! of$hiloso$h! for us first !ear students#It was Hans 6assen Martensen#He brought new life into the newuniersit! building#Martensen for man! !ears filled thelargest auditoriums
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks