A study of the direct and indirect effects of aerosols using global satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters

A study of the direct and indirect effects of aerosols using global satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters
of 15
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
  A study of the direct and indirect effects of aerosols usingglobal satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters Miho Sekiguchi, 1 Teruyuki Nakajima, 1 Kentaroh Suzuki, 1 Kazuaki Kawamoto, 2 Akiko Higurashi, 3 Daniel Rosenfeld, 4 Itaru Sano, 5 and Sonoyo Mukai 5 Received 26 December 2002; revised 8 May 2003; accepted 20 May 2003; published 21 November 2003. [ 1 ]  The present study investigated the correlations between aerosol and cloud parametersderived from satellite remote sensing for evaluating the radiative forcing of the aerosolindirect effect. The global statistics showed that the effective particle radius and the opticalthickness of low clouds correlate well with the column number concentration of theaerosol particles, indicating an aerosol indirect effect. A correlation of the cloud fractionwith the aerosol number was also seen, whereas we could not find a significant correlationof the cloud-top temperature with the column aerosol number. Furthermore, the regionalstatistics presented that positive correlations between the cloud optical thickness andcloud fraction with the aerosol column number concentration exist in most regionsconsistent with the global mean statistics. However, the effective cloud particle radiusshowed a tendency similar to the global correlation only around the seashore regions.Using these correlations and assuming that the aerosol column number concentration hasincreased by 30% from the preindustrial era, the total radiative forcing of the aerosolindirect effect was evaluated to be about   0.6 to  1.2 W m  2 . The radiative forcing of theaerosol direct effect from the satellite-retrieved parameters was also evaluated as  0.4 W m  2 over the ocean. The cloud-top temperature was found to be insensitive to thechange in the aerosol number, although there was a distinct negative correlation betweenthe aerosol number and cloud temperature at which the cloud particle grows to a radius of 14  m m. This particular dependency of the cloud temperature suggests that aerosols actson clouds so as to change cloud particle size near the cloud top, optical thickness, andfraction but to keep their cloud-top temperature without causing a significant longwaveradiative forcing.  I   NDEX   T   ERMS  :  0305 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801); 0320 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Cloud physics and chemistry; 3359Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Radiative processes; 3360 Meteorology and AtmosphericDynamics: Remote sensing;  K   EYWORDS  :  aerosol, radiative forcing, indirect effect  Citation:  Sekiguchi, M., T. Nakajima, K. Suzuki, K. Kawamoto, A. Higurashi, D. Rosenfeld, I. Sano, and S. Mukai, A study of thedirect and indirect effects of aerosols using global satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters,  J. Geophys. Res. ,  108 (D22), 4699,doi:10.1029/2002JD003359, 2003. 1. Introduction [ 2 ] With the advance of human activity, anthropogenicaerosols have increased since the preindustrial era similarlyto carbon dioxide and may have had a significant influenceon Earth’s climate. It has been recognized that the aerosoldirect effect caused by scattering and absorbing radiationmay offset part of the greenhouse warming, but it is difficult to precisely determine the effect because of complexities inthe aerosol transport process and in the chemical and optical propertiesoftheaerosols.Theyalsocauseanindirecteffectbymodifying the cloud microphysics, but the magnitude of theradiativeforcingofthiseffectisuncertain[  Intergovernmental  Panel on Climate Change  (  IPCC  ), 2001] because the cloudmodification process is highly variable and complicated.[ 3 ] It is thought that there are two kinds of indirect effects. The first indirect effect is that increasing aerosolscause an increase in the droplet number concentration and adecrease in the droplet size with a fixed liquid water content (LWC) [ Twomey , 1974]. This effect may cause an increasein the cloud reflectivity and contribute to a cooling of Earth.The second indirect effect, also known as the cloud lifetimeeffect, is that the reduction in the cloud droplet size affectsthe precipitation efficiency causing a significant increase inLWC and the cloud lifetime [  Albrecht  , 1989]. This effect may cause a further increase in the global albedo. Severalresearchers tried to estimate the indirect radiative forcingusing empirical relationships between the sulfate aerosol JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. D22, 4699, doi:10.1029/2002JD003359, 2003 1 Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,Japan. 2 Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan. 3  National Institutes for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan. 4 Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 5 Faculty of Science and Technology, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan.Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.0148-0227/03/2002JD003359$09.00 AAC 4  -  1  and the cloud droplet number concentration [  Jones et al. ,1994;  Jones and Slingo , 1996;  Lohmann and Feichter  ,1997], and parameterizations of the cloud nucleation pro-cess [  Lohmann et al. , 2000] in different GCMs. However,their studies significantly disagree among them, both on theestimated values and on the distributions. Reviewing thesevalues,  IPCC   [2001] concluded that the radiative forcing of the first indirect effect exists over a rather wide range from 0to   2 W m  2 .  IPCC   [2001] did not give any estimate for the second indirect effect because there are few studies toconfirm the estimation.[ 4 ] Satellites have been also used to observe cloudmodifications by aerosols.  Kaufman and Nakajima  [1993]and  Kaufman and Fraser   [1997] observed that clouds wereaffected by biomass burning over the Amazon Basin, andthey showed evidence for two types of cloud modificationdue to biomass burning aerosols.  Han et al.  [1998] foundthat the cloud albedo increases with decreasing droplet sizefor optically thicker clouds, but contrary for thinner clouds, because the liquid water content may not remain constant if the cloud droplet number concentration changes.  Wetzel and Stowe  [1999] and  Nakajima et al.  [2001] showed thecorrelation between cloud and aerosol microphysical parameters using AVHRR satellite data. The latter hasestimated the first and second indirect radiative forcingranges from   0.7 to   1.7 W m  2 over the global oceanusing their correlation and with an assumption of 15% to40% increase in the aerosol number after the industrialrevolution.[ 5 ] Along with the progress in understanding the radia-tive forcing of the aerosol indirect effect, the aerosol effect on the hydrological cycle, through modification of thevertical thickness and horizontal extent of clouds, hasrecently received much attention.  Albrecht   [1989] studiedthe cloud fraction change using a one-dimensional modeland suggested that the precipitation efficiency of shallowclouds decreases and the cloud fraction increases.  Pincusand Baker   [1994] showed that increasing LWC might change the cloud geometrical thickness using a simplemodel of stratocumulus clouds in the marine boundarylayer. This effect is possible to change the radiation budget and decrease the outgoing longwave radiation.  Rosenfeld  [2000] demonstrated using TRMM data that urban andindustrial air pollution could reduce the cloud particle sizeand suppress precipitation. Furthermore,  Ramanathan et al. [2001] proposed that the reduction in the surface solar radiation due to anthropogenic aerosols over the IndianOcean is balanced by a reduction in the evaporation, whichwill have to be balanced by a reduction in rainfall andeffectively spin down the hydrological cycle. However,  Ackerman et al.  [2000] observed that the cloud fractionmight be reduced by solar radiation absorption of soot  particles.[ 6 ] In this study, we perform a comprehensive investiga-tion of the correlation between cloud parameters andthe column aerosol number by extending the method of   Nakajima et al.  [2001]. In this statistical method, we payattention not only to the microphysical change (effectiveradius and optical thickness) but also to the cloud structure(cloud height and cloud fraction) modification by aerosols.We further evaluate the radiative forcings of the direct andindirect effects of aerosols using the obtained statistics.[ 7 ] The next section briefly describes the data sets andthe radiation code used in calculation of the radiativeforcing, and section 3 presents the correlation betweenthe aerosol number concentration and cloud parametersand discusses its significance. Section 4 shows estima-tions of direct and indirect forcings of aerosols using thederived correlation. Discussions and conclusions followin section 5. 2. Data Sources and Model Description 2.1. Satellite Data [ 8 ] Two satellite data sets are used in this study. Oneconsists of aerosol and cloud parameters obtained fromthe National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAdvanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (NOAA/ AVHRR). Data from 60   N to 60  S with a resolution of a0.5   0.5   longitude-latitude box were processed everydayin January, April, July, and October of 1990. The other dataset is obtained from Polarization and Directionality of theEarth’s Reflectance (POLDER) aboard the Advanced EarthObserving Satellite (ADEOS), which is available over landand ocean. The analyzed region is from 90   N to 90  S with a0.5     0.5   longitude-latitude resolution for every monthfrom November 1996 to June 1997.[ 9 ] The aerosol optical thickness,  t a , at a referencewavelength of 0.5  m m, and wavelength-mean A˚ngstro¨mexponent,  a , were obtained by analysis of the channel-1and 2 of AVHRR with the algorism developed by  Higurashiand Nakajima  [1999] and  Higurashi et al.  [2000]. Theyassumed a bimodal lognormal volume spectrum for theaerosol size distribution as dV d   ln r  ¼ X 2 n ¼ 1 C  n  exp   12ln r   ln r  mn ln  s n   2 " # ;  ð 1 Þ where  V   is the volume,  r   is the particle radius andsubscript   n  indicates the mode number. They adopted  r  m1  =0.17  m m,  r  m2  = 3.44  m m,  s 1  = 1.96 and  s 2  = 2.37 for the parameters of the modeled volume spectrum in their retrieval scheme. Two undetermined parameters in equa-tion (1),  C  1  and  C  2 , and hence the optical thickness  t a  andA˚ngstro¨m exponent   a  can be determined from the two-channel satellite radiances. The wavelength-averaged  t a and  a  are calculated by a regression line fitted in therange from 0.36 to 1.05  m m. We calculated the columnaerosol number concentration using these retrieved aerosol parameters.[ 10 ] We also used a global distribution of cloud micro- physical parameters obtained by analysis of channel-1(visible), 3 (middle infrared) and 4 (thermal infrared) of AVHRR with the algorithm developed by  Nakajima and  Nakajima  [1995] and  Kawamoto et al.  [2001]. This algo-rithm is applied only to water clouds, so that we limited our analysis to cloudy pixels with the cloud-top temperaturegreater than 257 K. This threshold is lower than thetemperature to perfectly exclude ice particles, so that thisdata may include ice particles. However, this ice particlecontamination will be small because several test analyseswith a threshold of 273 K showed no significant differencefrom the results with 257 K. The analyzed cloud parametersare the effective radius, cloud optical thickness, cloud-top AAC 4  -  2 SEKIGUCHI ET AL.: AEROSOL INDIRECT EFFECT  temperature and cloud fraction. The effective radius isdefined as r  e  ¼  r  3   r  2 h i ¼ Z   r  3 n r  ð Þ dr  Z   r  2 n r  ð Þ dr  ;  ð 2 Þ where  r   is the radius of the cloud droplet, and  n ( r  ) is thecloud droplet number per atmospheric column at   r  . Thecloud liquid water content (LWC) can be expressed as: W   ¼  LWC   h ¼ 43 pr w Z   1 0 r  3 n r  ð Þ dr  ¼ 43 pr w  N  c r  3 v  ; a ;  ð 3 Þ where  W   is the liquid water path,  h  is the cloud geometricalthickness,  r  v.a  is the volume-averaged radius, and  r w  is thedensity of water. The cloud optical thickness is expressedas: t c  ¼ 34 Q ext  W r  e ;  ð 4 Þ where  Q ext   is the extinction efficiency, which is about twofor wavelengths much shorter than  r  e . We assume amonomodal lognormal number distribution. The cloudamount data are derived from the number of cloudy pixelsin each 0.5     0.5   segmented box. The temporal andspatial resolution of the data are as same as those of theaerosol data.[ 11 ] The aerosol parameters over the ocean and landare also derived from POLDER data using the combined2-channel method and a polarimetry method [  Mukai and Sano , 1999;  Sano and Mukai , 2000]. The effective cloud particle radius has been retrieved using the angular patternof the polarized radiance at 0.865  m m [ Yasumoto et al. ,2002]. 2.2. Radiative Transfer Model [ 12 ] We use the radiation code  mstrn8  that is used in theCCSR/NIES AGCM for calculating the radiative forcing.The code combines a  k  -distribution method with the dis-crete-ordinate method/adding method [  Nakajima et al. ,2000]. We use an 18-band and 37-channel version withwavelengths that range from 0.2  m m to 200  m m. This codecan treat Rayleigh scattering and absorption/emission for gaseous matter and Mie scattering and absorption/emissionfor particulate matter. The optical properties of aerosols andclouds are assumed to be same as the satellite-retrievedvalues. We calculate the radiative forcing of aerosols andclouds with the horizontal spatial resolution of 2.5    2.5  longitude-latitude grids and 17 vertical levels. The cloudlayer is assumed as a single layer because we have only thesatellite-derived cloud fraction data. The atmospheric tem- perature and water vapor profiles are obtained from theECMWF (European Centre of Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) reanalysis data set for every day of the analysis period. The CO 2  concentration is assumed to be 358.6 ppmv.The O 3  column concentration is adopted from the ISCCP(International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project) data set [  Rossow and Schiffer  , 1999]. The other gaseous concentra-tions are assumed as those of the U.S. standard atmosphere. 3. Results [ 13 ] In order to evaluate the quantitative magnitude of theaerosol and cloud interaction, we study the correlations between the column number concentration of aerosol par-ticles (  N  a ) and cloud parameters, i.e., effective radius ( r  e ),cloud optical thickness ( t c ), cloud-top temperature ( T  c ) andcloud fraction ( n ), which are retrieved from the satelliteradiance data, and liquid water path ( W  ), cloud droplet number concentration (  N  c ) and cloud geometrical thickness(  z  h ), which are calculated using the satellite-derived cloud parameters. At first, we consider the relation between theaerosol column number concentration and the cloud droplet number concentration, for which the following approxima-tion is considered to be well established [ Twomey , 1984;  Kaufman and Fraser  , 1997;  Nakajima et al. , 2001]:  log 10  N  c  ¼  g   log 10  N  a ;  ð 5 Þ where  g   should be less than 1. Using this assumption,equation (3) yields  log 10  W   ¼  g   log 10  N  a þ 3  log 10  r  e :  ð 6 Þ If the liquid water path does not significantly change, therelation between  N  a  and  r  e  can be expressed as follows:  log 10  r  e  ¼  g  = 3  log 10  N  a :  ð 7 Þ Similar to these equations, the relation between  N  a  and  t c can be expressed using equations (4) and (6).  log 10  W   ¼  log 10  t c þ  log 10  r  e  ¼  g   log 10  N  a þ 3  log 10  r  e ð 8 Þ If the liquid water path does not significantly change, thefollowing relation is established:  log 10  t c  ¼  g  = 3  log 10  N  a :  ð 9 Þ These equations suggest that we should study the correla-tions in the form of  log 10  Y   ¼ a  y þ b  y  log 10  N  a :  ð 10 Þ 3.1. Global Correlation Between Aerosol andCloud Parameters [ 14 ] At first, we take the correlation using the spatiallyand temporally averaged data to find a common feature of the correlation statistics. The AVHRR-derived parametersare averaged spatially over a 2.5     2.5   segmented area,and temporally over 3 days, one week, 10 days, 2 weeksandone month from the daily 0.5     0.5   data. The averagedvalues are further used to calculate the correlation lineapplying a log linear regression method with equation (10).Since there is a large variability in the averaged values,we bin the averaged data into number bins of    log 10  N  a  = SEKIGUCHI ET AL.: AEROSOL INDIRECT EFFECT  AAC 4  -  3  0.02 to calculate the mean value and standard deviation ineach bin. To select significant data, we do not use the datasmaller than the 2.5th percentile or greater than the 97.5th percentile. Figure 1 shows the correlation between log 10  N  a and log 10 r  e  using the 2.5   2.5   daily averaged data. Notethat the effective cloud particle radius decreases almost linearly with increasing aerosol particle numbers. Thistendency is consistent with equation (7) under the assump-tion of a fixed liquid water path or the first kind indirect effect proposed by  Twomey  [1974]. Using a  t   test, thenegative correlation is found to be statistically significant with the 95% significance level for each month. A smallcorrelation slope  b r   in magnitude for the turbid conditions of log 10  N  a  > 8.0 indicates a saturation in the cloud response tothe large CCN loading as also reported by several research-ers [  Leaitch et al. , 1992;  Martin et al. , 1994;  Boucher and  Lohmann , 1995;  Nakajima et al. , 2001]. Figure 2 shows theslopes and coefficients of correlation between log 10  N  a  andlog 10 r  e  using several spatial and temporal averagings of thesrcinal daily 0.5   0.5   AVHRR data. It is found that thecorrelation coefficient approaches one quickly with wider spatial and/or temporary averages and the daily 0.5   0.5  data do not look suitable for obtaining a reliable correlation, because of the large variability in the data caused by thedecreased number of cases with both cloudy and clear pixelsfor analysis and also by perturbations of small-scaleddynamical effects. The correlation slope becomes consist-ently similar values independent of the averaging methodwith wider spatial and/or temporary averages, though thereis a decreasing trend with increasing averaging time.Figure 3 shows the correlation between log 10  N  a  and log 10 r  e using the 2.5     2.5   three monthly averaged data (DJF:December 1996 to February 1997; MAM: March to May1997) derived from POLDER. The figure shows there is anoverall consistency between the AVHRR and POLDER datasets over the ocean. Over the ocean, the slope of thePOLDER is 2/3 of that of AVHRR, and the correlationslope over land is about half of that over the ocean (Table 1).This land/ocean contrast also indicates a CCN saturation phenomenon in the cloud particle change due to a high CCNloading. Unlike the AVHRR data case, however, thePOLDER data show a reduction in the effective radius for very small aerosol numbers for log 10  N  a  < 7.4. Figure 1.  Correlation plots between column aerosolnumber and cloud effective radius using 2.5     2.5   dailyaveraged AVHRR data. Circles, squares, diamonds, andtriangles show averaged values in January, April, July, andOctober 1990, respectively, and error bars indicate onestandard deviation. Figure 2.  Correlation slopes and coefficients betweenaerosol column number concentration and cloud effectiveradius using spatially and temporally averaged data.  X   axisindicates the length of temporal average of the daily 0.5   0.5   data. Circles, squares, diamonds, and triangles showaveraged values in January, April, July, and October 1990,respectively. Solid and broken lines indicate 2.5     2.5  averaged and 0.5     0.5   data, respectively. AAC 4  -  4 SEKIGUCHI ET AL.: AEROSOL INDIRECT EFFECT  [ 15 ] Figure 4 shows a similar plot between log 10  N  a  andlog 10 t c . The effect of changing radii and cloud lifetime,referred to as the first and second indirect effects, seems tocause a change in the cloud optical thickness as suggested by the positive correlation in Figure 4. A  t   test confirmedthe existence of the positive correlation as statisticallysignificant of the 95% significance level. Though  Nakajimaet al.  [2001] found these correlations in the range of log 10  N  a  > 7.8, the present analysis shows a positive corre-lation in all the regions shown in the figure. It should benoted, however, that the regression slope in the present study becomes steep around log 10  N  a  = 7.8 to indicate thereis a different cloud response with low and high CCNconcentrations. This difference may come from the differ-ence in the averaging procedures in the studies, especiallywith shorter temporal period for averaging (one day in the present case) for retrieving the cloud-aerosol interactionsignature more suitably than in the case of one month inthe work of   Nakajima et al.  [2001]. Figure 5 shows theslopes and coefficients of correlation between log 10  N  a  andlog 10 t c  with several spatial and temporal averagings. Thecorrelation parameters significantly depend on the spatialand temporal average methods contrary to the behavior of the correlation parameters for   r  e  as shown in Figure 2. TheApril correlation even changes sign from positive to nega- Figure 3.  Correlation plots between column aerosolnumber concentration and cloud effective radius using2.5     2.5   monthly averaged POLDER data. Circles,squares, and diamonds indicate averaged values from(a) December 1996 to February 1997 and from (b) Marchto May 1997 in each bin over the ocean, seashore, and land,respectively, and error bars indicate one standard deviation. Figure 4.  Same as Figure 1, but for the correlation between column aerosol number concentration and cloudoptical thickness using 2.5   2.5   daily averaged AVHRR data. Table 1.  Annual Mean of the Correlation Slopes Parameter Global a  Regional  b log  10 r  e AVHRR   0.100 ± 0.019   0.031 ± 0.101POLDER Ocean   0.0689   0.0087 ± 0.039Coastal   0.0498   0.022 ± 0.074Land   0.0346   0.0055 ± 0.120log 10 t c  0.156 ± 0.046 0.124 ± 0.167log 10 W   0.0400 ± 0.0415log 10  N  c  0.388 ± 0.175 T  c  1.09 ± 2.96 0.767 ± 2.830 T  14   11.97 ± 4.12 n  0.0857 ± 0.0253 0.115 ± 0.121  z  h  24.0 ± 455 a  The average of the global correlation slopes using 2.5     2.5   data.  b The global average of the regional correlation slopes. SEKIGUCHI ET AL.: AEROSOL INDIRECT EFFECT  AAC 4  -  5
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks