Scrapbooking

A z mode electron-cyclotron maser model for bottomside ionospheric harmonic radio emissions

Description
A z mode electron-cyclotron maser model for bottomside ionospheric harmonic radio emissions
Categories
Published
of 10
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Related Documents
Share
Transcript
  JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 103, NO. A4, PAGES 7017-7026, APRIL 1, 1998 A z mode electronscyclotron maser model for bottomside ionospheric harmonic radio emissions A. J. Willes and S. D. Bale 1 Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, London Z. Kuncic Department f Physics nd Astronomy, niversity f Victoria, ritish olumbia, anada Abstract. A model is proposed or recent ground-based observations of auroral roar emissions, detected at 2f•e and 3f•e, where f•e is the local electron cyclotron frequency n the source egion, between 200 and 500 km above the Earth's surface. Electron cyclotron maser emission is a likely mechanism to account for these emissions because it naturally produces coherent radiation at harmonics of f•e. A theory for auroral roar emissions has already been proposed, whereby maser- generated second X2) and third (X3) harmonic x mode radiation s amplified n the source egion by multiple reflections off the walls of the density cavity in which they are produced. After many reflections he X2 and X3 waves propagate along the density cavity to a ground-based observer. However, it is demonstrated here with ray-tracing calculations hat it is highly probable hat maser-generated 2 and X3 radiation is reabsorbed at lower altitudes and thus cannot be detected at the ground. An indirect maser mechanism s proposed nstead, where maser-generated z mode waves at f•e grow to high levels n the source region and then undergo repeated nonlinear wave-wave coalescence o produce second- and third-harmonic waves hat propagate directly to the ground. The z mode waves must satisfy the necessary kinematic constraints to produce observable second- and third-harmonic radiation. The dependence of the z mode maser on the temperature and functional form of the unstable electron distribution is discussed, long with the conditions required for the coalescence rocesses o proceed and produce the observed evels of radiation. 1. Introduction Ground-based observations in the auroral zone of nar- rowband adiation at twice he (local onospheric) lec- tron cyclotron requency Kellogg nd Monson, 1979, 1984] have recently been supplemented y the detec- tion of third-harmonic emissions [Weatherwax t al., 1993a, 1995]. These "auroral oar" emissions ccur n the frequency ange 2500-3000 kHz (for the second ar- monic) and 3800-4300 kHz (third harmonic), nd the harmonic components can be observed either simulta- neously or individually. However, when observed si- multaneously, he two harmonic bands typically do not exhibit similar eatures or obey an exact harmonic 3:2) •Now at Space Sciences aboratory, University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley. Copyright 1998 by the American Geophysical Union. Paper number 97JA03601. 0148-0227/98/97JA-03601509.00 frequency elationship Weatherwax t al., 1993a], m- plying that they can only correspond o second- and third-harmonic emission f each component s produced at different source heights (with slightly variant val- ues of the local electron cyclotron requency ie). A cyclotron maser theory has been proposed Yoon et al., 1996] o explain hese observations. n this model the observed emissions re produced by direct electron- cyclotron maser emission n the second-harmonic X2) and third-harmonic X3) magnetoionic modes. The free energy for the maser is provided by an unstable, trapped electron population in the lower ionosphere. Energetic electrons are trapped at these altitudes be- tween the opposing effects of magnetic mirroring at lower altitudes and parallel electric fields at higher al- titudes. Comparison of the relative temporal growth rates for the fundamental and harmonic x and o modes reveals hat X2, X3 and O1 (fundamental o mode) waves can all be produced for typical parameter val- ues in the bottomside ionosphere. The fundamental x mode is suppressed because the required low densities are not attained in the ionosphere. 7017  7018 WILLES ET AL.' LOWER IONOSPHERIC Z MODE MASER In this paper we draw attention to growth of funda- mental z mode waves Z1). The z mode s the "slow" branch of the magnetoionic extraordinary mode. Fun- damental z mode waves were not included in the anal- ysis of Yoon et al. [1996] because hey focused n di- rect maser emission hat generates waves hat can es- cape the ionosphere o reach a ground-based bserver. The z mode waves are usually trapped in the iono- sphere and can only propagate o the ground n spe- cial circumstances Horne, 1995]. Previous nalyses f maser growth rates comparing growth rates in the var- ious competing modes Melrose et al., 1984; Winglee, 1985; Benson and Wong, 1987] have demonstrated he dominance of the z mode over fundamental and har- monic x and o modes over a broad range of parameters, particularly when the spatial growth rate is considered (which avors mode waves ecause f their slow group speed). Here we argue the case for a z mode-driven maser mechanism o explain the auroral roar emissions. irst, we show hat the third-harmonic mode (X3) direct maser spatial growth ates are too low (relative o the second harmonic) o explain the observed o•nparable intensities of the two harmonic components. We then demonstrate, with a ray-tracing code, hat it is highly probable hat direct, maser-generated 2, X3, and O1 (fundamental o mode) radiation s reabsorbed t lower altitudes in the source egion. The ray paths of z mode waves, on the other hand, are restricted o a small range of altitudes about the source height and can thus con- tinue to grow o high evels without encountering trong absorption. The proposed mechanism is indirect be- cause he trapped z mode waves must undergo epeated nonlinear wave coalescences n order to produce second- and higher-harmonic electromagnetic waves which then propagate o the ground. A theory for emission t cy- clotron harmonics due to the repeated coalescence f z mode waves was first proposed n a model to explain second-harmonic Melrose nd Dulk, 1984] and higher- harmonic emission ands [Melrose, 1991] n solar mi- crowave spike bursts generated n the solar corona. A later model for solar spike bursts, based on the non- linear coalescence f electron-cyclotron maser emission (ECME)-generated electrostatic Bernstein waves, bet- ter accounts or the observed oninteger atios between the multiple-frequency bands and their comparable n- tensities Willes and Robinson, 996, 1997]. Indirect generation mechanisms to produce second- and third- harmonic auroral roar emissions ave also been pro- posed by other authors. Weatherwax t al. [1995] uled out nonlinear wave-wave nteractions etween ower hy- brid and upper hybrid waves o produce electromag- netic waves because f the low power produced. A spec- ulative remark on the possibility of repeated z mode wave coalescence eing responsible or these emissions was also made by Weatherwax et al. The following ections e calculate he spatial growth rates for the competing wave modes and demonstrate the viability of a z mode maser or plasma parameters relevant o the bottomside onosphere. The conditions under which z mode growth is favored are discussed, along with the dependence n the functional orm and temperature of the unstable electron population. We then perform ay-tracing calculations n a model density cavity in the lower ionosphere, or a particular auroral roar event in which both second- and third-harmonic emissions are present. We demonstrate both the reab- sorption of maser-generated 2 waves and the "trap- ping" of maser-generated z mode waves n the source region. Finally, we discuss he nonlinear coalescence processes equired o produce he observed adiation, in particular, he requirements f energy and momentum conservation nd a comparison f the inferred bright- ness temperatures with observations. 2. Comparison of Spatial Growth Rates In this section, yclotron-maser rowth ates are com- pared or X2, X3, O1, and Z1 waves: We choose ring- like, hot electron distribution o model he trapped elec- tron population as the source of free energy or maser emission. By comparing he X2 and X3 spatial growth rates, we argue hat the X3 growth rate is too low to ad- equately explain observations of simultaneous second- and third-harmonic auroral roar. The temporal growth rate of the emitted waves n mode M, defined so that the energy n the waves grows as e M(k) , is given y [Melrose, 986] r(k) f a w(k, , ) c x +kll f(u) (1) CU_L U_L • ' where (u) is the distribution unction of electrons nd the normalized momentum u is defined in terms of the velocity v and momentum p of the electrons by p ?v u - = , (2) me and the probability unction wM(k, u, s) satisfies s) - 2•7q•R•(k) = eor•l•(k)l e•(k)'V(k' , x 5 ('),• s• - kllCUll , (3) for the Lorentz actor ? = (1 + u2) /2, RM(k) is the ratio of electric o total energy for mode M), •vM(k) is the wave requency, •(k) is the polarization ector, and V(k, u,s) is the velocity unction or a spiraling charge Melrose, 1986]. The strongest contribution o the growth rate is pro- vided by the Of(u)/OU_L erm in (1), and positive wave  WILLES ET AL.: LOWER IONOSPHERIC Z MODE MASER 7019 growth thus requires a positive slope in perpendicular velocities. Omidi et al. [1984] dentified hree possi- ble sources f free energy n the measured electron dis- tribution in the source region of maser-produced, u- roral kilometric radiation (at significantly igher alti- tudes han for the auroral oar sources). he two main sources are a loss cone and a "bump" feature. The loss cone distribution is produced by magnetic mirror- ing and therefore should also exist at lower altitudes (provided hat the source s above he mirror point). The bump component s composed f electrons rapped between the upward directed mirror and the down- ward force on electrons xerted by parallel electric ields [Louarn t al., 1990]. This is modeled ere by the ring- like distribution used by Yoon et al. [1996], with , - a2 52 , (4) where /• is the pitch angle, and A is the normaliza- tion actor, with A 1 = •rS/2a Serf(I/5)P(uo/a), or P(x) - xexp(-x 2) + x/-•(x + 1/2)[1 + err(x)], a is the thermal spread parameter, u0 defines he perpendicular offset of the distribution, and 5 defines he pitch angle width of the distribution. Yoon et al. [1996] derived a growth ate expression assuming a ring-like, hot electron distribution and a thermal background electron population (which con- tributes o damping of waves) nd assuming he semirel- ativistic approximation to the Lorentz factor, with ? = I + u2/2. Their calculation ssumed ratio of hot to thermal electrons f nhot/nth 10 $. In this regime, the wave dispersion s dominated by the thermal plasma and cold plasma magnetoionic modes may be assumed. For comparison ith the results of Yoon et al. [1996], 4 -4 -2 0 2 z Ull Figure 1. Contour plot (log) of the total electron dis- tribution unction, omprising hermal electrons C•th 5.8 X 10 $) and a ring-like omponent c• = 0.045, = 0.4, u0 = 2.5c•). Both Ull and uñ (components f u par- allel and perpendicular o B) axes are scaled n units of c•. See text for variable definitions. l0 l0 10 10 l0 10 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 .... i i i i 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 COp/•e 2.5 Figure 2. Comparison f the product of spatial growth rate Fs = Fc/•evg, and bandwidth Ao•/o• or the X2, X3, Z1, and O1 wave modes, maximized over wave re- quency nd angle, as a function of we assume the same electron distribution, with similar parameters: C•hot 0.06 (2 keV electrons), 5 = 0.4, u0 = 2.5c•, nd C•th - 5.8 X 10 4 (8.6 X 10 2 eV elec- trons). For the Maxwellian component, o 0 and the limit 5 -+ oc is taken. The total electron distribution (thermal and trapped) is shown n Figure I (with an exaggerated hermal temperature or clarity). The growth rates for each mode vary most markedly with the ratio of frequencies, •p/•e. Figure 2 shows he product of the spatial growth rate (temporal growth rate divided by group speed of waves) and the band- width Ao•/o•, maximized over wave requency nd an- gle, as a function of o•p/•e. The product of the spa- tial growth rate and the bandwidth gives he best mea- sure of the amplification rate for when the maser does not saturate and the electron cyclotrbn requency aries with height [Hewitt et al., 1983; Melrose et al., 1984; Melrose, 1991]. The spatial growth is more relevant in this context because mode waves have significantly lower group speeds han X2, X3, or O1 waves where he group speed s close o c). This is important f growth occurs n small, localized regions or if the maser oper- ates close o a state of marginal stability, where growth rates are small and the maser does not saturate Robin- son, 1991; Melrose, 991], so that the z mode waves spend more time in the growth region and hence expe- rience more amplification. It is also necessary o take into account the bandwidth because he local cyclotron frequency varies with altitude and the waves can move out of the region n which they can grow. Additionally, wave absorption rom the background Maxwellian is in- cluded n the growth ate calculation. or o•p/•e • 0.1, the fundamental x mode has the highest growth rate (not shown n Figure 2). However, n the bottom- side onosphere, nly values or o•p/•e above 0.3 are observed Benson nd Wong, 1987; Yoon et al., 1996]. Figure 2 shows hat Z1, O1, and X2 waves have com- parable growth ates or 0.3 • o•p/•e • 0.8. The reason  7020 WILLES ET AL.: LOWER IONOSPHERIC Z MODE MASER for the discontinuity n the slope of. he Z1 curve near wp/f•e • I is discussed n Section . Weatherwax t al. [1995] showed hat all these modes have growth ates that exceed the collisional damping rate in the lower ionosphere. Results similar to Figure 2 are obtained if a loss cone electron distribution is assumed n place of the ring distribution. In both cases he X3 spatial growth rate is at least 2 to 3 orders of magnitude be- low the X2 growth rate. Ray-tracing calculations f the path of propagation of maser-emitted X2 and X3 waves in a model cavity density structure Yoon et al., 1996] predict comparable ath lengths to within a factor of 2) for the propagating 2 and X3 waves n the source e- gion. It is thus unlikely that the third-harmonic compo- nent of auroral emission s produced by direct X3 emis- sion because t is often observed at comparable ntensi- ties to the second-harmonic omponent Weatherwax t al., 1995], whereas he theory suggests hat the product of spatial growth rate and path length is considerably lower for X3 than X2 waves. The X2 spatial growth rate is itself quite low, and many passes hrough the source region (after reflections rom the cavity walls) are re- quired o produce everal -foldings f growth Yoon et al., 1996]. If the assumption hot/nth << I is not valid in the source egion, then the X2 and O1 spatial growth rates are significantly igher relative o the Z1 and X3 rates) owing to slower group speeds s a result of splitting of the dispersion elation [Winglee, 1985]. This further widens the gap between he spatial growth rates of the X2 and X3 waves. 3. Ray Tracing of Maser-Generated Waves In this section we report on the results of ray-tracing calculations, modeling a particular auroral roar event n which simultaneous second- and third-harmonic com- ponents were observed. We first show that X2 rays encounter a strong absorption region just below their source altitude and thus cannot propagate o a ground- based observer. This conclusion extends also to X3 and O1 waves. We then demonstrate that, for the appro- priate parameters, z mode waves can be trapped in the source egion and thus grow to high levels before being damped. These z mode waves can coalesce o produce second- and third-harmonic electromagnetic waves, as discussed in section 4. The numerical ray-tracing calculations discussed n this section are based on the geometric optics approxi- mation, which is valid in our model because he wave- length of the propagating waves s well below he other spatial scales n the source egion. It is possible, how- ever, that in the auroral ionosphere, smaller spatial Linear Scale Black = 50 White = 5 05/11/92 wo Rivers, laska Dartmouth ollege hysics avg/max 0 *':• •'"•• ',:i:'"'-'•""•"'"'•'Y'" ,,• •.•.•:•., . '••.••5•..-.,.•,.•,i,';:.__.';:•....,.: ..................... ........................................ "'""'"' "'"•*"•'""- '-'• ...... •z ........ .•.•;.•.::•:.**:.-..:...:.*..-..,..,.'• j"•i""' "'""'•""•'•'•'•"••'•..-'•• ;i .'.•.'" .'.'.•.'•.'.'•:½.'.•.....:•'*,,•.... ..• :--:.-.-:.-.-:::-,?.:'.-::.-',.-'.'.::.-':.'½.-.'...'.-.--.-:. ...%.'-'.'.:...*. .':.-'-%•½,.-'...-:.-.':-:-.'...':,.....:::..:.•:......:....*:`..``***.•`...:•%.`.;.`.?..:,.:..*:...::..`.;,•`..•.....:.:``•:....s:>.:z ........ ::.-::-•'...•. ..-.,'.,?•:.. •..`•s..`:...,..•*:.*•:*.`.:::.•.....,....`•:....::....*.,.•:•*::..`.*:s;`z*•*•****:*.``•:•`•**:. ,*......:•..`.*•....:.:....:::..::..:*:.::::..`;..`:•..................:..::..:•.`.....:4..........•.:•.;•*..:.`.•*.`. *-':-'-'-'*-'.--'.'-• 3600.0 ........................ •""•':':•' :• ...,..:,:,•..::5:U:(:..'.%,..,...,."-.', ................ 2600 • • i•.`,`..}.`:............,.•:•``..i...:•,...``.•..`.:....``•i...:,.•.......`....•....•i• ..:. ,;•½3•?½..:.......•.•-• .,..i½---:---'--. .....:•.... •i.:•i:.-.:...-•.::;.:..-..:: .•. .?.;-..,...-.-..•.-:..-,...:;..*.•*.,.....:2...*:.•.`..*::....`...•...:*....`..:.`*•:*,*?....•..`..:::*:•*.`...` :-...-:::•...-,..-,..-:½•...•?-..•...ii?:•:........:...:•:.•i .--.-•.-.-..-"•'-"•••'"'" •'•••"•••'•"i':'"'"':"'"'""'"':'•%• ":"*' ":-"':--"---:"•:...':-'$• ;iP" :'•"" •' • - 401•0 /UT Figure 3. Dynamic spectrum for an auroral roar event with both second- and third-harmonic components from Weatherwax t al., 1993a,b].  WILLES ET AL.: LOWER IONOSPHERIC Z MODE MASER 7021 structures may exist where he geometric ptics approx- imation is not valid. The ray equations are dr 0w(k, r) X = ok ' (5) 2 dk Ow(k, ) dt Or ' (6) where t is a parametric epresentation f the points along he wave path, defined o hat the tangent o the ray path s equal o the group elocity, ith va(k r) := &o(k, r)/Ok. The ray-tracing ode sed ere s an adap- tation of an earlier code ormulated o study he prop- agation and absorption ffects of maser-generated un- damental and o mode adiation n a coronal lux oop [Kuncic nd Robinson, 993]. In our ray-tracing analysis we choose o model a par- ticular auroral roar event (May 11, 1992, between 020 and 1030 UT [Weatherwax t al., 1993a, , Figure ]) that exhibits simultaneous second and third harmonics. The dynamic pectrum or this event s shown n Fig- ure 3. Assuming ipolar variation n the magnetic ield strength and that the two components re emitted at twice and three times he local electron yclotron re- quency, he second-harmonic omponent 2.75 MHz) is emitted approximately t a height of 200 km, and the third harmonic 3.9 MHz) is emitted t a height f 300 km. It then follows hat the source egion where he trapped energetic lectrons xist) extends t least 100 km in the vertical direction. A schematic epresenta- tion of the source egion for auroral roar emissions s shown n Figure 4. Z / 400 km - 300 km - 200 km - 100 km - Density cavity X X Source eight of 3•eemission Source eight of 2f• eemission B Ground ) x Figure 4. Schematic icture of the auroral roar source region, with the second- nd third-harmonic ompo- nents generated t different ltitudes n a field-aligned density cavity. (--.0 /• e -150 .... i , , i , , i .... .... i , , i , I I I .... -100 -50 0 50 100 150 x (km) Figure 5. Model density cavity profile, using 7) with the following arameters: - 0.65, b = 3, W = 6 x 104 m, andA=1.2x104m. In the lower onosphere he ratio wp/fie exceeds nity (typically -5). For such igh alues f wp/fie, one f the X2, O 1, or Z1 modes s unstable, s shown n Figure 2. However, ower values f cop/fie xist n field-aligned density cavities, where wp/fie can be low enough or any of the X2, X3, O1, or Z1 waves o grow. In the model of Yoon et al. [1996], such cavities also act as a waveguide, allowing X2 and X3 waves o propagate to the ground. We adopt a model similar o that of Yoon et al. [1996] or the density cavity profile, based on ground-based ncoherent scatter radar observations [Doe et al., 1993, 1995], with cop- 2 tanh A +b2_a i (7) : where b is the value of cop utside he cavity (which varies ith he onospheric ensity rofile; ee igure ), a is the value of cop t the center of the cavity which remains constant), w is the width of the cavity, and A determines he slope f the cavity. Equation 7) is only well defined or b > a. Figure 5 shows typical density profile or b = 3, a = 0.65, w - 6 x 104 m, and A - 1.2 x 104 m. In addition, e ncorporate nto our model he variation f he ocal yclotron requency, which slowly ncreases ith decreasing ltitude, and he variation of the plasma requency ith height which determines arameter b in (7)) using he international reference onosphere Bilitza et al., 1993] or the time and coordinates f the Weatherwax t al. [1993a] vent. Figure displays he variation f electron ensity ith height sed n our ay-tracing odel. n the ray-tracing calculations resented elow we assume hat the hot, trapped electron distribution only exists in the inner region f the density avity, or ]x _< x 104 m. 3.1. X2 Waves Figure 7 shows ontours f constant rowth solid contours) nd absorption dashed ontours) ate for maser emission n the second-harmonic mode, assum-
Search
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks